[1] BICAN O, MINAGAR A, PRUITT AA. The spinal cord: a review of functional neuroanatomy. Neurol Clin. 2013;31(1):1-18.
[2] ELI I, LERNER DP, GHOGAWALA Z. Acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurol Clin. 2021;39(2):471-488.
[3] LUU DK, NGUYEN AT, JIANG M, et al. Deep learning-based approaches for decoding motor intent from peripheral nerve signals. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:667907.
[4] LUU DK, NGUYEN AT, JIANG M, et al. Artificial intelligence enables real-time and intuitive control of prostheses via nerve interface. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022;69(10):3051-3063.
[5] ROMEO-GUITART D, FORéS J, HERRANDO-GRABULOSA M, et al. Neuroprotective drug for nerve trauma revealed using artificial intelligence. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1879.
[6] GUO Y, SUN L, ZHONG W, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted repair of peripheral nerve injury: a new research hotspot and associated challenges. Neural Regen Res. 2024;19(3):663-670.
[7] GOLDBERG D, MCCOUCH S, KLEINBERG J. Constructing comparative genome maps with unresolved marker order. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2002;7:139-150.
[8] EVANS N, HARTIGAN C, KANDILAKIS C, et al. Acute cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses during exoskeleton-assisted walking overground among persons with chronic spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21(2):122-132.
[9] SANCHEZ-VILLAMAñAN MDC, GONZALEZ-VARGAS J, TORRICELLI D, et al. Compliant lower limb exoskeletons: a comprehensive review on mechanical design principles. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):55.
[10] BANALA SK, KIM SH, AGRAWAL SK, et al. Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX). IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2009;17(1):2-8.
[11] FANG CY, TSAI JL, LI GS, et al. Effects of robot-assisted gait training in individuals with spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:2102785.
[12] COLLINGER JL, WODLINGER B, DOWNEY JE, et al. High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. Lancet. 2013;381(9866):557-564.
[13] ANGELI CA, EDGERTON VR, GERASIMENKO YP, et al. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain. 2014; 137(Pt 5):1394-1409.
[14] CORTES M, ELDER J, RYKMAN A, et al. Improved motor performance in chronic spinal cord injury following upper-limb robotic training. Neurorehabilitation. 2013; 33(1):57-65.
[15] COURTINE G, GERASIMENKO Y, VAN DEN BRAND R, et al. Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(10):1333-1342.
[16] IJSPEERT AJ, CRESPI A, RYCZKO D, et al. From swimming to walking with a salamander robot driven by a spinal cord model. Science. 2007;315(5817): 1416-1420.
[17] AJIBOYE AB, WILLETT FR, YOUNG DR, et al. Restoration of reaching and grasping movements through brain-controlled muscle stimulation in a person with tetraplegia: a proof-of-concept demonstration. Lancet. 2017;389(10081):1821-1830.
[18] GILL ML, GRAHN PJ, CALVERT JS, et al. Neuromodulation of lumbosacral spinal networks enables independent stepping after complete paraplegia. Nat Med. 2018; 24(11):1677-1682.
[19] MILLER LE, ZIMMERMANN AK, HERBERT WG. Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016;9:455-466.
[20] ESQUENAZI A, TALATY M, PACKEL A, et al. The ReWalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatory function to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 91(11):911-921.
[21] LOUIE DR, ENG JJ, LAM T. Gait speed using powered robotic exoskeletons after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and correlational study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:82.
[22] WIRZ M, ZEMON DH, RUPP R, et al. Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(4):672-680.
[23] BACH BAUNSGAARD C, VIG NISSEN U, KATRIN BRUST A, et al. Gait training after spinal cord injury: safety, feasibility and gait function following 8 weeks of training with the exoskeletons from Ekso Bionics. Spinal Cord. 2018;56(2):106-116.
[24] KOZLOWSKI AJ, BRYCE TN, DIJKERS MP. Time and effort required by persons with spinal cord injury to learn to use a powered exoskeleton for assisted walking. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21(2):110-121.
[25] ZEILIG G, WEINGARDEN H, ZWECKER M, et al. Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk™ exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people with complete spinal cord injury: a pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35(2): 96-101.
[26] NAM KY, KIM HJ, KWON BS, et al. Robot-assisted gait training (Lokomat) improves walking function and activity in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14(1):24.
[27] HARTIGAN C, KANDILAKIS C, DALLEY S, et al. Mobility outcomes following five training sessions with a powered exoskeleton. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21(2):93-99.
[28] FIELD-FOTE EC, ROACH KE. Influence of a locomotor training approach on walking speed and distance in people with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2011;91(1):48-60.
[29] HOMCHANTHANAKUL J, MANOONPONG P. Continuous online adaptation of bioinspired adaptive neuroendocrine control for autonomous walking robots. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2022; 33(5):1833-1845.
[30] QI W, FAN H, KARIMI HR, et al. An adaptive reinforcement learning-based multimodal data fusion framework for human-robot confrontation gaming. Neural Netw. 2023; 164:489-496.
[31] PIGOZZI F, MEDVET E. Evolving modularity in soft robots through an embodied and self-organizing neural controller. Artif Life. 2022; 28(3):322-347.
[32] TAN R, GAO L, KHAN N, et al. Interpretable Artificial Intelligence through Locality Guided Neural Networks. Neural Netw. 2022;155:58-73.
[33] SRISUCHINNAWONG A, HOMCHANTHANAKUL J, MANOONPONG P. NeuroVis: real-time neural information measurement and visualization of embodied neural systems. Front Neural Circuits. 2021;15:743101.
[34] GORRE N, CARRANZA E, FUHRMAN J, et al. MIDRC CRP10 AI interface-an integrated tool for exploring, testing and visualization of AI models. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68(7):10.
[35] JIANG Y, WANG Y, MIAO Z, et al. Composite-learning-based adaptive neural control for dual-arm robots with relative motion. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2022; 33(3):1010-1021.
[36] LI X, ZHANG T, LI C, et al. Electrical stimulation accelerates Wallerian degeneration and promotes nerve regeneration after sciatic nerve injury. Glia. 2023;71(3):758-774.
[37] FISHER LE, LEMPKA SF. Neurotechnology for pain. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2023;25: 387-412.
[38] DOLBOW DR, GORGEY AS, JOHNSTON TE, et al. Electrical stimulation exercise for people with spinal cord injury: a healthcare provider perspective. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(9):3150.
[39] BARRA B, CONTI S, PERICH MG, et al. Epidural electrical stimulation of the cervical dorsal roots restores voluntary upper limb control in paralyzed monkeys. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25(7):924-934.
[40] LUO S, RABBANI Q, CRONE NE. Brain-computer interface: applications to speech decoding and synthesis to augment communication. Neurotherapeutics. 2022; 19(1):263-273.
[41] CAJIGAS I, VEDANTAM A. Brain-computer interface, neuromodulation, and neurorehabilitation strategies for spinal cord injury. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021;32(3):407-417.
[42] COLUCCI A, VERMEHREN M, CAVALLO A, et al. Brain-computer interface-controlled exoskeletons in clinical neurorehabilitation: ready or not? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022;36(12):747-756.
[43] BOUTON CE. Merging brain-computer interface and functional electrical stimulation technologies for movement restoration. Handb Clin Neurol. 2020;168: 303-309.
[44] STAMPACCHIA G, GAZZOTTI V, OLIVIERI M, et al. Gait robot-assisted rehabilitation in persons with spinal cord injury: a scoping review. Neurorehabilitation. 2022; 51(4):609-647.
[45] MIGALEV AS, VIGASINA KD, GOTOVTSEV PM. A review of motor neural system robotic modeling approaches and instruments. Biol Cybern. 2022;116(3):271-306.
[46] TRAN P, JEONG S, WOLF SL, et al. Patient-specific, voice-controlled, robotic flexotendon glove-ii system for spinal cord injury. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2020;5(2): 898-905.
[47] OGATA K, UMINO T, NAKAYAMA T, et al. Dummy humanoid robot simulating several trunk postures and abdominal shapes - Report of element technologies. Advanced Robotics. 2017;31(6):303-310.
[48] SHE HT, ZHANG WM, HUANG HL, et al. Anti-skid foot design for a humanoid robot[C]//2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO 2014).[2024-02-03].
[49] KOVACIC J, CANAGASINGHAM A, GOOLAM A, et al. A robot-assisted laparoscopic revision of an artificial urinary sphincter in a patient with spinal cord injury. BJU Int. 2023. doi: 10.1111/bju.16153.
[50] LIU DD, HE JQ, SINHA R, et al. Purification and characterization of human neural stem and progenitor cells. Cell. 2023;186(6): 1179-1194.e1115.
[51] SOTO J, DING X, WANG A, et al. Neural crest-like stem cells for tissue regeneration. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2021;10(5):681-693.
[52] SHENDE P, DEVLEKAR NP. A review on the role of artificial intelligence in stem cell therapy: an initiative for modern medicines. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2021;22(9):1156-1163.
[53] LI G, ZHANG B, SUN JH, et al. An NT-3-releasing bioscaffold supports the formation of TrkC-modified neural stem cell-derived neural network tissue with efficacy in repairing spinal cord injury. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(11):3766-3781.
[54] YUAN T, SHAO Y, ZHOU X, et al. Highly permeable DNA supramolecular hydrogel promotes neurogenesis and functional recovery after completely transected spinal cord injury. Adv Mater. 2021;33(35):e2102428.
[55] BUENO A, BOSCH I, RODRíGUEZ A, et al. Automated cervical spinal cord segmentation in real-world MRI of multiple sclerosis patients by optimized hybrid residual attention-aware convolutional neural networks. J Digit Imaging. 2022; 35(5):1131-1142.
[56] CHEN G, WU H, CHEN N, et al. Potential of intraoperative ultrasonographic assessment of the spinal cord central echo complex in predicting postoperative neurological recovery of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur J Neurol. 2022;29(1): 217-224.
[57] CARSON T, GHOSHAL G, CORNWALL GB, et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled, real-time intraoperative ultrasound imaging of neural structures within the psoas: validation in a porcine spine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021;46(3):E146-E152.
[58] NOZAWA K, MAKI S, FURUYA T, et al. Magnetic resonance image segmentation of the compressed spinal cord in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy using convolutional neural networks. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023;18(1): 45-54.
[59] ZHANG Z, HE T, HUANG L, et al. Immune gene prognostic signature for disease free survival of gastric cancer: translational research of an artificial intelligence survival predictive system. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:2329-2346.
[60] SARAJLIC P, PLUNDE O, FRANCO-CERECEDA A, et al. Artificial intelligence models reveal sex-specific gene expression in aortic valve calcification. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2021;6(5):403-412.
[61] HE T, HUANG L, LI J, et al. Potential prognostic immune biomarkers of overall survival in ovarian cancer through comprehensive bioinformatics analysis: a novel artificial intelligence survival prediction system. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:587496.
[62] YEO YH, SAMAAN JS, NG WH, et al. Assessing the performance of ChatGPT in answering questions regarding cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023;29(3):721-732.
[63] GRüNEBAUM A, CHERVENAK J, POLLET SL, et al. The exciting potential for ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(6):696-705. |