BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing-assisted total hip arthroplasty plays an
important role in preoperative planning, intraoperative guidance and
positioning, and production of individualized implants. It has important
clinical significance for the treatment of hip joint diseases.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of
preoperative planning using 3D printed models to assist total hip arthroplasty
by systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Libray,
CNKI, Wanfang databases were retrieved electronically for the articles
published before December 2019. The keywords were “hip arthroplasty, hip
replacement, THA, 3D printing, three dimensional printing” in Chinese and
English, respectively. The clinical controlled trials of 3D printed models
versus non-3D printed models to assist total hip arthroplasty in the treatment
of hip joint diseases were enrolled. The literature was screened according to
the inclusion and exclusion criteria; data were extracted; and the quality of
the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane 5.1.0 bias risk
assessment tool, followed by data analysis using RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Fourteen controlled
studies were included, involving 601 participants, including 279 cases in the
3D group and 322 cases in the traditional surgery group. (2) Meta-analysis
results showed that during the first hip arthroplasty, the operation time in
the 3D group was shorter than that in the traditional surgery group [SMD=-0.89, 95%CI (-1.15, -0.64), P < 0.05]. There was no significant
difference in the Harris score between two groups [SMD=0.64, 95%CI (-0.26, 1.54), P > 0.05]. During revision surgery,
the operation time in the 3D group was shorter than that in the traditional
surgery group [SMD=-1.39, 95% CI (-1.92, -0.86), P < 0.05], and Harris
score was higher than that in the traditional surgery group [SMD=1.51, 95%CI (-0.05,
2.96), P < 0.05]. The
intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume in the 3D group
were less than those in the traditional surgery group [SMD=-1.90,
95%CI (-2.82, -0.99), P < 0.05; SMD=-2.87, 95%CI (-3.36, -2.37), P < 0.05]. The anteversion angle and
abduction angle in the 3D group were closer to the preoperative design angle compared
with the traditional surgery group [SMD=-1.24, 95%CI (-1.57, -0.91), P < 0.05; SMD=-1.71, 95%CI (-2.96, -0.45), P < 0.05]. (3) These results show
that compared with traditional total hip arthroplasty, 3D printing assisted
total hip arthroplasty can significantly shorten the operation time, reduce the
amount of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage, improve the
accuracy of total hip arthroplasty, and can better relieve pain, and improve
the quality of life. However, due to the low quality of the included
literature, high-quality large-sample, multi-center randomized controlled
trials are still needed to confirm the clinical efficacy.