[1] YANG G, WANG J, LIU Y, et al. Burden of Knee Osteoarthritis in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990-2019: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023;75(12): 2489-2500.
[2] 李晓敏, 田向东, 王朝鲁. 单平面胫骨高位截骨:股腓角作为力线矫正的参考标志[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2026,30(3):570-576.
[3] BERGSTEIN VE, WEINBLATT AI, TAYLOR WLT, et al. Total knee arthroplasty survivorship and outcomes in young patients: a review of the literature and 40-year update to a longitudinal study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024;144(9):4077-4083.
[4] ZHANG Z, YAN Z, WANG G, et al. Early results of high tibial osteotomy versus combined arthroscopic surgery. Front Surg. 2024;11:1325483.
[5] FABER S, ANGELE P, ZELLNER J, et al. Comparison of Clinical Outcome following Cartilage Repair for Patients with Underlying Varus Deformity with or without Additional High Tibial Osteotomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Study Based on the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). Cartilage. 2021;13(1):1206-1216.
[6] YOO OS, LEE YS, LEE MC, et al. Morphologic analysis of the proximal tibia after open wedge high tibial osteotomy for proper plate fitting. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):423.
[7] MACLEOD AR, SERRANCOLI G, FREGLY BJ, et al. The effect of plate design, bridging span, and fracture healing on the performance of high tibial osteotomy plates: An experimental and finite element study. Bone Joint Res. 2018;7(12):639-649.
[8] BISICCHIA S, ROSSO F, PIZZIMENTI MA, et al. Injury risk to extraosseous knee vasculature during osteotomies: a cadaveric study with CT and dissection analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(3):1030-1039.
[9] LI J, YANG Q, ZHANG M, et al. Factors influencing the posterior tibial slope after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025;13:1525542.
[10] ARAYA N, KOGA H, NAKAGAWA Y, et al. Risk factors for delayed bone union in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2024; 35(3):546-553.
[11] WOODACRE T, RICKETTS M, EVANS JT, et al. Complications associated with opening wedge high tibial osteotomy--A review of the literature and of 15 years of experience. Knee. 2016;23(2):276-282.
[12] XU Z, LI Y, HUANG W, et al. Preliminary exploration of the biomechanical properties of three novel cervical porous fusion cages using a finite element study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):876.
[13] JIANG C, GONG G, XIAO S, et al. Mechanical and biological properties of 3D-printed porous titanium scaffolds coated with composite growth factors. BMC oral health. 2025;25(1):808.
[14] NI S, YANG R, LIU S, et al. Biomechanical analysis of a newly designed and 3D printed plate-locking interbody cage: an observational study of finite element analysis. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):3534.
[15] FAN J, CAO Y, CUI Z, et al. A novel nail-plate construct for the treatment of AO/OTA 31-A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures: a finite element analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025;13:1559765.
[16] EHLINGER M, AZOTI W, CROM LL, et al. Analysis of load distribution on the plate and lateral hinge of a valgus opening high tibial osteotomy during weight-bearing: a finite element analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2025;111(1):103956.
[17] CARRANZA VA, GETGOOD A, WILLING R, et al. Comparing Simulation Approaches Used in Finite Element Modelling of a Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy. Ann Biomed Eng. 2025;53(3):731-739.
[18] VALKERING KP, VAN DEN BEKEROM MP, KAPPELHOFF FM, et al. Complications after tomofix medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Knee Surg. 2009;22(3):218-225.
[19] GU Y, SUN Y, SHUJAAT S, et al. 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds for long bone repair in animal models: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):68.
[20] CALEK AK, HOCHREITER B, BUCKLAND AJ. 3D-Printed Titanium Cages for Anterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Result in Excellent Fusion Rates One Year After Surgery. lobal Spine J. 2025;16(1): 21925682251344557.
[21] WEINBERG JH, RITCHEY N, KWOK W, et al. Lumbar Fusion With Micro- & Nano-Textured, 3D Printed Porous Titanium Versus PEEK Interbody Cages in TLIF: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Global Spine J. 2025:21925682251347528.
[22] 徐志, 刘子铭, 李豫皖, 等. 多孔结构设计人工踝关节衬垫生物力学的优化方案[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2024,28(30):4817-4824.
[23] 徐志, 李豫皖, 刘子铭, 等. 五种内固定方式治疗SeinsheimerⅤ型股骨转子下骨折的生物力学特性比较[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2024,44(9): 616-625.
[24] LEE HH, HONG HT, KIM JK, et al. Optimization of Tibial Stem Geometry in Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Design of Experiments: A Finite Element Analysis. Bioengineering (Basel). 2025;12(2):172.
[25] XU Z, LI Y, RAO J, et al. Biomechanical assessment of disease outcome in surgical interventions for medial meniscal posterior root tears: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):1093.
[26] 张静, 张嘉宁, 郭磊, 等. 开放式胫骨高位截骨术中三维打印填充块设计的生物力学研究[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志,2024,41(4):758-765.
[27] YANG JC, LIN KY, LIN HH, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of high tibial osteotomy plate with internal support block using finite element analysis. PloS One. 2021;16(2):247412.
[28] 段克友, 王照东, 刘亚军, 等. 三种内固定方式治疗青少年胫骨结节撕脱骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2025,39(1):75-82.
[29] LI G, WANG L, PAN W, et al. In vitro and in vivo study of additive manufactured porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds for repairing bone defects. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34072.
[30] LIU BW, XU W, LU X, et al. The Optimization of Ti Gradient Porous Structure Involves the Finite Element Simulation Analysis. Frontiers in Materials. 2021;8. doi:10.3389/fmats.2021.642135.
[31] 郭嘉忱, 高俊, 戴文昊, 等. 压应力微环境在骨折愈合过程中对细胞因子的影响[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2026,30(4):908-916.
[32] ZHAI WJ, LIU L, GAO YH, et al. Application of 3D‑printed porous titanium interbody fusion cage vs. polyether ether ketone interbody fusion cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis update. Exp Ther Med. 2024;28(1):290.
[33] LIU SX, ZENG TH, CHEN CM, et al. 3D-printed porous titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of subsidence. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1389533.
[34] CHEN B, LIANG H, YANG L, et al. 3D printing individualized augments prosthesis and acetabular implant for the treatment of Crowe type III developmental dysplasia of the hip. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):19514.
[35] YE J, MIAO B, XIONG Y, et al. 3D printed porous magnesium metal scaffolds with bioactive coating for bone defect repair: enhancing angiogenesis and osteogenesis. J Nanobiotechnology. 2025;23(1):160.
[36] ABDULAZIZ D, ANASTASIOU AD, PANAGIOTOPOULOU V, et al. Physiologically engineered porous titanium/brushite scaffolds for critical-size bone defects: A design and manufacturing study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023;148:106223.
[37] WANG G, CUI Y, LENG Y, et al. Engineered three-dimensional bioactive scaffold for enhanced bone regeneration through modulating transplanted adipose derived mesenchymal stem cell and stimulating angiogenesis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12:1342590. |