Knowledge structure and evolutionary trends in the application of surface electromyography in musculoskeletal pain rehabilitation

doi:10.12307/2026.770

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Surface electromyography, as a non-invasive neuromuscular monitoring technique, enables real-time quantification of muscle function status. It offers significant advantages in musculoskeletal pain diagnosis and treatment, efficacy assessment, and therapeutic optimization, providing objective evidence for precision diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal pain.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the current research status, hotspots, and evolutionary trends of surface electromyography application in musculoskeletal pain rehabilitation through bibliometric analysis.
METHODS: Relevant literature on surface electromyography in musculoskeletal pain rehabilitation from 2000 to 2025 was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. CiteSpace 6.4.R1 software was used to analyze countries, institutions, authors, journals, key words, etc.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 507 articles were included in the bibliometric analysis. From 2000 to 2025, the number of publications on surface electromyography in musculoskeletal pain rehabilitation exhibited a fluctuating upward trend. China produced the highest number of publications, while Italy exhibited the highest centrality. Aalborg University ranked first in both highest number and centrality of publications. Anders Christoph from Germany was the most prolific author, and the journal with the highest co-citation frequency was Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology. Application research on surface electromyography in musculoskeletal pain rehabilitation exhibits interdisciplinary characteristics, spanning neurology, molecular science, biology, sports medicine, rehabilitation, and physical education. Core keywords in this field include musculoskeletal pain, surface electromyography, and low back pain, with current research hotspots focusing on muscle performance, spine, and therapeutic exercise. Over the past two decades, surface electromyography has been widely adopted as a non-invasive monitoring technique in musculoskeletal pain rehabilitation. Research has expanded from fundamental theory to clinical applications and occupational health, indicating that future academic exploration will unfold in diverse and multifaceted directions.

Key words: surface electromyography, musculoskeletal pain, bibliometrics, research hotspot, CiteSpace, rehabilitation field

CLC Number:

Chen Yuanyue, Shen Junfan, Yu Cui, Lu Jianxia, Hu Wenxuan, Zhu Jun, Guo Chuan. Knowledge structure and evolutionary trends in the application of surface electromyography in musculoskeletal pain rehabilitation[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2026, 30(18): 4791-4801.

References

[1] CIEZA A, CAUSEY K, KAMENOV K, et al. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2021;396(10267):2006-2017.
[2] KINNEY M, SEIDER J, BEATY AF, et al. The impact of therapeutic alliance in physical therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review of the literature. Physiother Theory Pract. 2020;36(8): 886-898.
[3] CHOI SY, KIM YJ, KIM B. Effect of Auriculotherapy on Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2022;52(1):4-23.
[4] WALLY MK, HSU JR, SEYMOUR RB. Musculoskeletal Pain Management and Patient Mental Health and Well-being. J Orthop Trauma. 2022;36(Suppl 5):S19-S24.
[5] MEI F, LI JJ, LI J, et al. Global Cluster Analysis and Network Visualization in Musculoskeletal Pain Management: A Scientometric Mapping. Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(1):301-314.
[6] PLOTKIN DL, ROBERTS MD, HAUN CT, et al. Muscle Fiber Type Transitions with Exercise Training: Shifting Perspectives. Sports (Basel). 2021;9(9):127.
[7] WINSTEIN CJ, STEIN J, ARENA R, et al. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98-e169.
[8] STOJIC S, BOEHL G, RUBINELLI S, et al. Two decades of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in health research: a bibliometric analysis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025;20(2):444-451.
[9] AMANDA IG, JOOST TPK, LAURA EB, et al. Can Crafted Communication Strategies Allow Musculoskeletal Specialists to Address Health Within the Biopsychosocial Paradigm? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021; 479(6):1217-1223.
[10] FRESK M, GROOTEN WJA, BRODIN N, et al. Mapping information regarding the work-related disability of depression and long-term musculoskeletal pain to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and ICF Core Sets. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023;4:1159208.
[11] KHAN AM, KHAWAJA SG, AKRAM MU, et al. sEMG dataset of routine activities. Data Brief. 2020;33:106543.
[12] LATHLEAN TJH, RAMACHANDRAN AK, SIM S, et al. The clinical utility and reliability of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: A systematic review. J Clin Neurosci. 2024;129:110877.
[13] SZYSZKA-SOMMERFELD L, SYCIŃSKA-DZIARNOWSKA M, SPAGNUOLO G, et al. Surface electromyography in the assessment of masticatory muscle activity in patients with pain-related temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1184036.
[14] DEBORAH F, ALESSIO G. New insights into pain-related changes in muscle activation revealed by high-density surface electromyography. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2020; 52(0):102422.
[15] ALCAN V, ZINNUROĞLU M. Current developments in surface electromyography. Turk J Med Sci. 2023;53(5):1019-1031.
[16] CHEN C, SONG M. Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews. PLoS One. 2019; 14(10):e0223994.
[17] 王振洲,张杨.近20年国际人工智能赋能特殊儿童诊断及干预研究的可视化分析[J].中国康复理论与实践,2024,30(4): 404-415.
[18] TARTAGLIA GM, LODETTI G, PAIVA G, et al. Surface electromyographic assessment of patients with long lasting temporomandibular joint disorder pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011;21(4):659-664.
[19] AL-SALEH MA, ARMIJO-OLIVO S, FLORES-MIR C, et al. Electromyography in diagnosing temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143(4):351-362.
[20] SANTANA-MORA U, LÓPEZ-RATÓN M, MORA MJ, et al. Surface raw electromyography has a moderate discriminatory capacity for differentiating between healthy individuals and those with TMD: a diagnostic study. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014;24(3):332-340.
[21] SCHIFFMAN E, OHRBACH R, TRUELOVE E, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28(1):6-27.
[22] SZYSZKA-SOMMERFELD L, MACHOY M, LIPSKI M, et al. The Diagnostic Value of Electromyography in Identifying Patients With Pain-Related Temporomandibular Disorders. Front Neurol, 2019;10:180.
[23] 李倩,于娱,施琴芬.基于知识图谱的国内外颠覆式创新研究对比分析[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(15):9-19.
[24] MAO J, LI H, ZHAO Y. An innovative deep learning-driven technique for restoration of lost high-density surface electromyography signals. Appl Intell. 2025;55(7):1-16.
[25] NASRI N, ORTS-ESCOLANO S, CAZORLA M. An sEMG-Controlled 3D Game for Rehabilitation Therapies: Real-Time Time Hand Gesture Recognition Using Deep Learning Techniques. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(22):6451.
[26] GUO K, ORBAN M, LU J, et al. Empowering hand rehabilitation with ai-powered gesture recognition: A study of an semg-based system. Bioengineering. 2023;10(5):557.
[27] ANDERS C, BROSE G, HOFMANN GO, et al. Evaluation of the EMG-force relationship of trunk muscles during whole body tilt. J Biomech. 2008;41(2):333-339.
[28] ANDERS C, STEINIGER B. Main force directions of trunk muscles: A pilot study in healthy male subjects. Hum Mov Sci. 2018;60:214-224.
[29] ANDERS C, SCHÖNAU T. Spatiotemporal characteristics of lower back muscle fatigue during a ten minutes endurance test at 50% upper body weight in healthy inactive, endurance, and strength trained subjects. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0273856.
[30] ANDERS C, HÜBNER A. Influence of elastic lumbar support belts on trunk muscle function in patients with non-specific acute lumbar back pain. PLoS One. 2019;14(1): e0211042.
[31] VARRECCHIA T, MARCHIS CD, DRAICCHIO F, et al. Lifting Activity Assessment Using Kinematic Features and Neural Networks. Appl Sci. 2020; 10(6):1989.
[32] TIWANA V, SILVIA C, ALESSANDRO MARCO DN, et al. Trunk Muscle Coactivation in People with and without Low Back Pain during Fatiguing Frequency-Dependent Lifting Activities. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(4):1417.
[33] D’ANNA C, VARRECCHIA T, RANAVOLO A, et al. Centre of pressure parameters for the assessment of biomechanical risk in fatiguing frequency-dependent lifting activities. PLoS One. 2022;17(8):e0266731.
[34] RANAVOLO A, SERRAO M, DRAICCHIO F. Critical Issues and Imminent Challenges in the Use of sEMG in Return-To-Work Rehabilitation of Patients Affected by Neurological Disorders in the Epoch of Human-Robot Collaborative Technologies. Front Neurol. 2020;11:572069.
[35] RANAVOLO A, CHINI G, SILVETTI A, et al. Myoelectric manifestation of muscle fatigue in repetitive work detected by means of miniaturized sEMG sensors. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018;24(3):464-474.
[36] RANAVOLO A, AJOUDANI A, CHERUBINI A, et al. The Sensor-Based Biomechanical Risk Assessment at the Base of the Need for Revising of Standards for Human Ergonomics. Sensors (Basel). 2020;20(20): 5750.
[37] LARIVIÈRE C, ARSENAULT AB, GRAVEL D, et al. Surface electromyography assessment of back muscle intrinsic properties. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003;13(4):305-318.
[38] DE FELÍCIO CM, SIDEQUERSKY FV, TARTAGLIA GM, et al. Electromyographic standardized indices in healthy Brazilian young adults and data reproducibility. J Oral Rehabil. 2009;36(8):577-583.
[39] FALLA DL, JULL GA, HODGES PW. Patients with neck pain demonstrate reduced electromyographic activity of the deep cervical flexor muscles during performance of the craniocervical flexion test. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(19):2108-2114.
[40] YOSHIKAWA K, NAKAMORI M, USHIO K, et al. Analysis of the suprahyoid muscles during tongue elevation: High-density surface electromyography as a novel tool for swallowing-related muscle assessment. J Oral Rehabil. 2024;51(9):1872-1880.
[41] VANESSA T, NADIYA M, MARTIN H, et al. Test-retest reliability of high-resolution surface electromyographic activities of facial muscles during facial expressions in healthy adults: A prospective observational study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023;17(0):1126336.
[42] FEDERICI MI, DI PASQUALE F, VALENTI C, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Electromyography Potential to Discriminate Muscular or Articular Temporomandibular Disorders and Healthy Patients. Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(5):466.
[43] JIANG N, XUE J, LI G. Assessment of Lumbar Muscles Coordinated Activity Based on High-Density Surface Electromyography: A Pilot Study. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019;2019:2238-2241.
[44] GATEWOOD CT, TRAN AA, DRAGOO JL. The efficacy of post-operative devices following knee arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(2):501-516.
[45] YOKOYAMA H, KANEKO N, SASAKI A, et al. Firing behavior of single motor units of the tibialis anterior in human walking as non-invasively revealed by HDsEMG decomposition. J Neural Eng. 2022;19(6): 066033.
[46] BRANDT M, MADELEINE P, SAMANI A, et al. Effects of a Participatory Ergonomics Intervention With Wearable Technical Measurements of Physical Workload in the Construction Industry: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(12):e10272.
[47] SCANO A, PIROVANO I, MANUNZA ME, et al. Sustained fatigue assessment during isometric exercises with time-domain near infrared spectroscopy and surface electromyography signals. Biomed Opt Express. 2020;11(12):7357-7375.
[48] LATHLEAN T, RAMACHANDRAN AK, SIM S, et al. Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2022;12(5):e058652.
[49] ARVANITIDIS M, JIMÉNEZ-GRANDE D, HAOUIDJI-JAVAUX N, et al. People with chronic low back pain display spatial alterations in high-density surface EMG-torque oscillations. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):15178.
[50] FANG N, ZHANG C, LV J. Effects of Vertical Lifting Distance on Upper-Body Muscle Fatigue. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5468.
[51] ALBERTO R, DRAICCHIO F, VARRECCHIA T, et al. Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges-A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(9):2001.
[52] ZHONG S, JIA N, QU Y, et al. Analysis and study on biomarkers of local muscle fatigue caused by repetitive lifting task. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):660.
[53] NISHIKAWA Y, WATANABE K, CHIHARA T, et al. Influence of forward head posture on muscle activation pattern of the trapezius pars descendens muscle in young adults. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):19484.
[54] LI Y, LI X, SONG H, et al. Health-related outcomes with supervised exercise and myofascial release versus only supervised exercise in subacromial pain syndrome: a randomized controlled single-blind study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024; 16(1):171.
[55] WEGNER-CZERNIAK K, MĄCZYŃSKI J, BŁASZCZYK A, et al. Change in the Order of Activation of Lower Limb Muscles Relative to Spinal Extensors During the Janda Test and Change in Postural Balance in Patients with LBP After Muscle Energy Techniques. J Clin Med. 2025;14(5):1448.
[56] QIANG Z, ASHWIN I, ZIYUE S, et al. A Dual-Modal Approach Using Electromyography and Sonomyography Improves Prediction of Dynamic Ankle Movement: A Case Study. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021;29:1944-1954.
[57] ISMAIL BEN A, YASSINE B, AHMED A. Hybrid EMG-NMES control for real-time muscle fatigue reduction in bionic hands. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1)22467.
[58] ZEKAI L, XUANQI W, JUN G, et al. A Wireless, High-Quality, Soft and Portable Wrist-Worn System for sEMG Signal Detection. Micromachines (Basel). 2023;14(5):1085.