Stress relaxation and creep test of modified glass ionomer
cement

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2263

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Most of studies on the mechanical properties of modified glass ionomer cement mainly focus on the compression and bending experiments, but there are few reports on the stress relaxation and creep experiments of glass ionomer cement after adding strontium hydroxyapatite.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the stress relaxation and creep characteristics of traditional glass ionomer cement, composite resin enamel adhesive and modified glass ionomer cement.

METHODS: Strontium doped hydroxyapatite was added into glass ionomer cement according to the mass ratio of 15%, and then the modified glass ionomer cement was prepared. Samples of modified glass ionomer cement, composite resin enamel adhesive and traditional glass ionomer cement were maded. Ten samples from each group were taken for stress relaxation test and another 10 samples for creep test.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) At 7 200 s in the stress relaxation test, the stress in the traditional group was decreased by 1.18 MPa, decreased by 1.39 MPa in the composite group, and decreased by 1.38 MPa in the modified group. The decreased value in the traditional group was significantly less than that in the composite and modified groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between composite and modified groups (P > 0.05). (2) At 7 200 s in the creep test, the stress in the traditional group was increased by 0.24%, increased by 0.33% in the composite group, and increased by 0.32% in the modified group. The increased value in the traditional group was significantly less than that in the composite and modified groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between composite and modified groups (P > 0.05). (3) The viscoelastic properties of glass ionomer cement are improved by compounding 15% strontium-doped hydroxyapatite with glass ionomer cement. The increase of viscoelasticity is beneficial to the adhesion and bulk bond strength of glass ionomer cement.

Key words: glass ionomer cement, hydroxyapatite, composite resin enamel adhesive, modified glass ionomer cement, stress relaxation, creep, viscoelasticity

CLC Number:

Ding Jie, Li Xinying, Li Peng. Stress relaxation and creep test of modified glass ionomer cement[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2020, 24(22): 3515-3520.

Figures/Tables 5

References

[1] 陈莹,王健平,李岩,等.玻璃离子水门汀加入 Sr-HA 后机械性能的实验研究[J].黑龙江医药科学,2016,39(2):105-110.
[2] MOSHAVERINIA A, ANSARI S, MOSHAVERINIA M, et al. Effects of incorporation of hydroxyapatite and fluoroapatite nanobioceramics into conventional glass ionomer cements (GIC).Acta Biomaterialia. 2008; 4:432-440.
[3] FOTIADOU C, FRASHERI I, REYMUS M, et al. A 3-year controlled randomized clinical study on the performance of two glass-ionomer cements in Class II cavities of permanent teeth.Quintessence Int. 2019;50(8):592-602.
[4] NAGAS E, KUCUKKAYA S, EYMIRLI A, et al. Effect of Laser-ActivatedIrrigation on the Push-Out Bond Strength of ProRoot MineralTrioxide Aggregate and Biodentine in Furcal Perforations. Photomed Laser Surg.2017;35(4):231-235.
[5] DALTOÉ MO, PAULA-SILVA FW, FACCIOLI LH, et al. Expression ofMineralization Markers during Pulp Response to Biodentine andMineral Trioxide Aggregate.J Endod. 2016;42(4):596-603.
[6] SILVA LAB, PIERONI KAMG, NELSON-FILHO P, et al. Furcation Perforation: Periradicular Tissue Response to Biodentine as a Repair Material by Histopathologic and Indirect Immunofluorescence Analyses. J Endod. 2017;43(7):1137-1142.
[7] BIDRA AS, TISCHIER M, PATCH C, et al. Survival of 2039complete arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prosthe-ses : A retrospective study.J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(2):220-224.
[8] TAHAYERI A, MORGAN M, FUGOLIN AP, et al. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater.2018;34(2):192-200.
[9] FUKAZAWA S, ODAIRA C, KONDO H. Investigation of accura-cy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoralscanners.J Prosthodont Res.2017;61(4):450-459.
[10] NAGAS E, KUCUKKAYA S, EYMIRLI A, et al. Effect of Laser-Activated､Irrigation on the Push-Out Bond Strength of ProRoot MineralTrioxide Aggregate and Biodentine in Furcal Perforations.Photomed Laser Surg. 2017;35(4):231-235.
[11] 赵玥,丁元圣,孔宇,等.羟基磷灰石-玻璃离子水门汀的机械性能､氟释放行为与抑菌效果[J].实用口腔医学杂志, 2016,32(5): 631-634.
[12] 丁元圣,赵玥,郭睿,等.含氟羟基磷灰石涂层对正畸微种植体骨结合及周围炎的影响[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志,2016,32(5):624-626.
[13] 刘莉霞,陈琳.不同类型玻璃离子水门汀的氟释放行为与溶解性[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,18(16):2480-2486.
[14] 刘莹,王富,赵三军,等.3种粘结材料对粘结纤维桩的临床疗效观察[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2016,26(2):110-114.
[15] 刘蒂,苏葆辉,冉均国,等.羟基磷灰石改性玻璃离子水门汀的性能研究[J].硅酸盐通报,2010,29(2):440-449.
[16] 冯瑶,冯思聪,王建平,等.玻璃离子水门汀加入改良纳米羟基磷灰石后的性能[J].中国组织工程研究,2013,17(42):7382-7388.
[17] PIAO CD, LI ZW, DING J, et al. Analysis of BMSCs-intervened viscoelasticity of sciaticnerve in rats with chronic alcoholic intoxication. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira.2018; 33(10):935-991.
[18] 李正伟,吕雪漫,李新颖,等.聚乳酸-羟基乙酸导管移植修复坐骨神经损伤后的力学特性分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2017,21(6):917-923.
[19] 许东辉,黄淑华,李新颖,等.青年与老年尸体颈总动脉流变特性对比分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2017,21(16):2527-2633.
[20] 许东辉,李东原,黄淑华,等.WKY大鼠与自发性高血压模型大鼠(SHR)大脑中动脉拉伸力学特性的对比分析[J].生物医学工程研究, 2017,36(1): 86-89.
[21] NAVEAU B.Strontium: a new treatment for osteoporosis.Joint Bone Spine.2004;71(4):261-263.
[22] 刘光华.现代材料化学[M].上海:科学技术出版社,2000:245-253.
[23] 李志安.玻璃离子水门汀的改性策略[J].口腔材料器械杂志, 2018,27(2): 61-65.
[24] 巴晓兰.改性玻璃离子水门汀的研究进展[J].生物医学工程学杂志, 2005, 22(4):852-859.