Biological dressing A versus Physiotulle Ag in the repair of degree ll facial burns

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.16.021

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Biological dressing A (porcine Xenoderm) and Physiotulle Ag (Coloplast) show good effects on the absorption of exudates, adhesion and anti-bacteria in treatment of degree ll facial burns.
OBJECTIVE: To observe the effectiveness of biological dressing A versus Physiotulle Ag after early debridement of degree ll facial burns.
METHODS: A total of 15 patients with superficial degree ll facial burn and 10 patients with deep degree ll facial burns were included. Symmetric facial area of the same patient with the same depth of burn was divided into two parts of same size for treatments. One side was randomly selected as the experimental side, and treated with biological dressing A. The other was selected as the control side and treated with Physiotulle Ag. We compared wound healing time, infection, times of changing dressings, skin after healing, drug change comfort and dressing comfort between the two sides.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In patients with superficial grade ll facial burn, times of changing dressings and drug change comfort were better in the experimental side than in the control side (P < 0.05), but the dressing comfort was better in the control side than the experimental side (P < 0.05). No significant difference in wound healing time, infection and skin after healing was detected between the two sides. In patients with deep degree ll facial burns, wound healing time, times of changing dressings, skin after healing and drug change comfort were better in the experimental side than in the control side (P < 0.05), but the dressing comfort was better in the control side than the experimental side (P < 0.05). No significant difference in infection was detectable between the two sides. Above findings suggested that the therapeutic effects of biological dressing A and Physiotulle Ag were similar in treatment of degree ll facial burns. Biological dressing A in repair of deep degree ll facial burns promotes the wound healing and elevates the quality of healing.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：生物材料；骨生物材料; 口腔生物材料; 纳米材料; 缓释材料; 材料相容性；组织工程

全文链接：

Key words: Biological Dressings, Burns, Bandages, Hydrocolloid, Cicatrix

CLC Number:

R318

Wang Qiang, Liu Xiao-wen, Lv Ren-rong, Huo Ran. Biological dressing A versus Physiotulle Ag in the repair of degree ll facial burns[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2015, 19(16): 2573-2577.

Figures/Tables 2

References

[1] Wu J, Chen J. Pay close attention to the quality of life of patients and look to the future of burn rehabilitation. Zhonghua Shaoshang Zazhi.2013;29(2):119-121.
[2] Mabrouk A,Boughdadi NS,Helal HA,et al.Moist occlusive dressing (Aquacel® Ag) versus moist open dressing (MEBO®) in the management of partial-thickness facial burns: A comparative study in Ain Shams University.Burns. 2012;38(3):396-403.
[3] Hoogewerf CJ,Van BAr ME,Hop MJ,et al.Topical treatment for facial burns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;1:CD008058.
[4] Hoeksema H,Vandekerckhove D,Verbelen J,et al.A comparative study of 1% silver sulphadiazine (Flammazine®) versus an enzyme alginogel (Flaminal®) in the treatment of partial thickness burns.Burns.2013;39(6):1234-1241.
[5] Dougherty WR,Spence RJ.Reconstruction of the burned face/cheek: acute and delayed. Achauer and Sood's burn surgery: reconstruction and rehabilitation,2006:234-253.
[6] Vloemans A,Soesman AM,Suijker M,et al.A randomised clinical trial comparing a hydrocolloid-derived dressing and glycerol preserved allograft skin in the management of partial thickness burns.Burns.2003;29(7):702-710.
[7] Djaprie SM,Wardhana A.Dressing for Partial Thickness Burn Using Microbial Cellulose and Transparent Film Dressing: A Comparative Study. Jurnal Plastik Rekonstruksi.2013.
[8] Mirastschijski U,Sander JT,Weyand B,et al.Rehabilitation of burn patients: An underestimated socio-economic burden. Burns.2013;39(2):262-268.
[9] Bull JP,Squire JR,Topley E.Experiments with occlusive dressings of a new plastic.Lancet.1948;252(6519):213-215.
[10] Schilling RS,Roberts M,Goodman N.Clinical trial of occlusive plastic dressings.Lancet.1950;1(6599):293-296.
[11] Winter GD.Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature.1962;193:293-294.
[12] Wasiak J,Cleland H,Campbell F,et al.Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 3:CD002106.
[13] Caruso DM,Foster KN,Blome-Eberwein SA,et al.Randomized clinical study of Hydrofiber dressing with silver or silver sulfadiazine in the management of partial-thickness burns.J Burn Care Res.2006;27(3):298-309.
[14] Skórkowska-Telichowska K,Czemplik M,Kulma A,et al.The local treatment and available dressings designed for chronic wounds.J Am Acad Dermatol.2013;68(4):e117-e126.
[15] Lavery LA,La Fontaine J,Thakral G,et al.Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Approaches with Low and High Pressure, Silicone-Coated Dressing, and Polyurethane Foam Dressing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(3):722-726.
[16] Meaume S,Dissemond J,Addala A,et al.Evaluation of two fibrous wound dressings for the management of leg ulcers: Results of a European randomised controlled trial (EARTH RCT).J Wound Care.2014;23(3):105-116.
[17] Nyame TT,Chiang HA,Orgill DP.Clinical Applications of Skin Substitutes. Surg Clin North Am.2014;94(4):839-850.
[18] Chiu T,Burd A.“Xenograft” dressing in the treatment of burns.Clin Dermatol.2005;23(4):419-423.
[19] Hartstein B,Gausche-Hill M,Cancio LC.Burn Injuries in Children and the Use of Biological Dressings.Pediatr Emerg Care.2013;29(8):939-948.
[20] Hosseini SN,Mousavinasab SN,Fallahnezhat M.Xenoderm dressing in the treatment of second degree burns. Burns. 2007; 33(6):776-781.
[21] Eriksson A,Burcharth J,Rosenberg J.Animal derived products may conflict with religious patients' beliefs. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14(1):48.
[22] Verbelen J, Hoeksema H, Heyneman A, et al. Aquacel (®) Ag dressing versus Acticoat™ dressing in partial thickness burns: A prospective, randomized, controlled study in 100 patients. Part 1: Burn wound healing.Burns: journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 2013.
[23] Sullivan T,Smith J,Kermode J,et al.Rating the burn scar.J Burn CareRes.1990;11(3):256-260.
[24] Revill SI,Robinson JO,Rosen M,et al.The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia. 1976;31(9): 1191-1198.
[25] Gordon M. Burn care protocols: infection control. J Burn Care Rehabil.1997;8:67-71.
[26] Tompkins D. Burn nursing. In: Herndon D, editor. Total burn care. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders,1996:46.
[27] Hinman CD,Maibach H.Effect of air exposure and occlusion on experimental human skin wounds.Nature.1963;200:377-378.
[28] Gibran NS,Committee on Organization and Delivery of Burn Care, American Burn Association. Practice guidelines for burn care, 2006. J Burn Care Res.2006;27(4):437-438.
[29] Wright JB,Lam K,Burrell RE.Wound management in an era ofincreasing bacterial antibiotic resistance: a role for topical silver treatment. Am J Infect Control.1998;26(6):572-577.
[30] 陈炯,韩春茂,林小玮,等.纳米银敷料在修复Ⅱ度烧伤创面的应用研究[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(1):50-52.
[31] 王强,贾成钢.美宝湿润烧伤膏与磺胺嘧啶银霜治疗热镁渣烧伤的比较[J].中华烧伤疮疡杂志,2009,21(3):182-184.
[32] Sasse KC,Ackerman EM,Brandt JR.MatriStem xenograft material: Case series and cost analysis.Surgery.2013;1(1):3.
[33] Junkins-Hopkins JM.Biologic dressings.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64(1):e5-e7.
[34] Hermans MH.Porcine xenografts vs.(cryopreserved) allografts in the management of partial thickness burns: Is there a clinical difference?Burns.2014;40(3): 408-415.
[35] Barone AA,Mastroianni M,Farkash EA,et al.Genetically modified porcine split-thickness skin grafts as an alternative to allograft for provision of temporary wound coverage: preliminary characterization.Burns.2014.pⅡ: S0305-4179(14)00290-3. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2014.09.003. [Epub ahead of print]
[36] Gierek M,Kawecki M,Miku? K,et al.Biological Dressings as a Substitutes of the Skin in the Treatment of Burn Wounds.Pol Przegl Chir.2013;85(6):354-359.
[37] Raimer DW,Petitt MS,Nosrati N,et al.Porcine xenograft biosynthetic wound dressings for the management of postoperative Mohs wounds. Dermatol Online J. 2011;17(9):1.