Hip surface replacement and total hip arthroplasty: Meta-analysis on the efficacy

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.26.017

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Hip surface replacement has been widely used in recent years, but there is great controversy on which works better, hip surface replacement or traditional total hip arthroplasty.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the advantages and disadvantages of hip surface replacement and total hip arthroplasty trough compressive analyzing the published literatures.
METHODS: The randomized controlled trials on the hip surface replacement and total hip arthroplasty from January 1900 to July 2012 were retrieved. The quality of the included randomized controlled trials was evaluated strictly. The RevMan5.1.6 was used for Meta-analysis
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Ten randomized controlled trials were included. Results of Meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, 1 year postoperative Harris score, 1 year postoperative University of California at LosAngeles hip function score and serum levels of cobalt and chromium ion at 2 years after replacement between hip surface replacement and total hip arthroplasty. The average acetabulum anteversion angle in the hip surface replacement group was greater than that in the total hip arthroplasty group. The results indicate that there was no significant difference in the short-term follow-up between hip surface replacement and total hip arthroplasty, but the long-term effect needs to be evaluated with higher quality and larger sample clinical randomized controlled trials.

Key words: bone and joint implants, evidence based medicine of bone and joint, total hip replacemen, surface replacement, hip, Harris score, ion level, evidence-based medicine, joint replacement, acetabulum anteversion angle

CLC Number:

R318

Zhang Pi-jun, Hong Gu-qi, Wang Gang. Hip surface replacement and total hip arthroplasty: Meta-analysis on the efficacy[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.26.017.

Figures/Tables 9

References

[1] Liu P. Nartong Daxue Xuebao: Yixue Ban.2007;27(3):157-159.刘璠.人工全髋表面置换技术的历史与现状[J].南通大学学报(医学版),2007,27(3):157-159.

[2] dela Rosa MA, Silva M, Heisel C, et al. Range of motion after total hip resurfacing. Orthopedics. 2007;30(5):352-357.

[3] Abraham A, Hajipour L,Innes AR, et al. Are nationalguidelines for total hip replacement in the UK reflected in practice? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88 (2):108-115.

[4] Ahmad R, Gillespie G, Annamalai S, et al. Leg length and offset following hip resurfacing and hip replacement. Hip Int. 2009;19(2):136-140.

[5] Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(2):177-184.

[6] Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty:two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(1):28-39.

[7] Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(2):167-170.

[8] Wang Q, Zeng BF. Guowai Yixue: Gukexue Fence. 2005;26 (1): 58-59.王琦,曾炳芳.髋关节表面置换术[J].国外医学:骨科学分册, 2005, 26(1):58-59.

[9] Chan FW, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, et al. The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1999;(369):10-24.

[10] Medley JB, Chan FW, Krygier JJ, et al. Comparison of alloys and designs in a hip simulator study of metal on metal implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;(329Suppl):S148-159.

[11] Springer BD, Connelly SE, Odum SM, et al. Cementless femoral components in young patients:review and meta-analysis of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6 Suppl):2-8.

[12] Smith TO, Nichols R, Donell ST, et al. The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(6):684-695.

[13] Huo MH, Dumont GD, Knight JR, et al. What’s new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;19;93(20): 1944- 1950.

[14] Girard J, Lavigne M, Vendittoli P-A, et al. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip. A randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2006;88 (6):721-726.

[15] Lavigne M, Therrien M, Nantel J, et al. The John Charnley Award:The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same.A randomised double-blind study. Clin Orthop. 2010;(468):326-336.

[16] Rama KR, Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, et al. Heterotrophic ossification after surface replacement arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. A randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(2):256-262.

[17] Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, et al. Metal-onmetal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop. 2010: (468):318-325.

[18] Smolders JM, Hol A, Rijnberg WJ, et al. Metal ion levels and functional results after either resurfacing hip arthroplasty or conventional metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2011;82(5):559-566.

[19] Costa ML, Achten J, Parsons NR, et al. Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2012; 344:e2147.

[20] Bisseling P, Smolders JM, Hol A, et al. No clear influence of preference bias on satisfaction and early functional outcome in resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2011;82(2): 161-165.

[21] Petersen MK, Andersen NT, Mogensen P, et al. Gait analysis after total hip replacement with hip resurfacing implant or Mallory-head Exeterprosthesis:a randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2011;35(5):667-674.

[22] Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, Roy AG, et al. A comparison of clinical results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and 28 mm metal on metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomised trial with 3-6 years follow-up. Hip Int. 2010;20(01):1-13.

[23] Wang Q, Zhang XL, Chen YS, et al. Resurfacing arthroplasty for hip dysplasia:a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(6):768-773.

[24] Li J, Wang JL. Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi.2001;81(1):53-55.李静,王家良.系统评价的方法与评价原则[J].中华医学杂志, 2001,81(1):53-55.

[25] Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel C, et al. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86-A(1):40-46.

[26] Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, et al. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(2):163-166.

[27] Doorn PF, Mirra JM, Campbell PA, et al. Tissue reaction to metal on metal total hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;(329 Suppl):S187-205.

[28] Doorn PF, Campbell PA, Worrall J, et al. Metal wear particle characterization from metal on metal total hip replacements: transmission electron microscopy study of periprosthetic tissues and isolated particles. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998; 42(1):103-111.

[29] Schmalzried TP. Preoperative templating and biomechanics in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2005;28:S849-851.

[30] Beaul PE, Campbell PA, Hoke R, et aI. Notching of the femoralneck during resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip:a vascular study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(1):35-39.

[31] Lewis CG, Stmderman FW Jr. Metal carcinogenesis in total joint arthroplasty. Animal models. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996:(329 Suppl):S264-268.

[32] Moroni A, Savarino L, Hoque M, et al. Do Ion Levels In Hip Resurfacing Differ From Metal-on-metal THA at Midterm? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(1):180-187.