Three approaches of pedicle screw internal fixation for thoracolumbar fractures: spinal function, vertebral height reduction and local Cobb angle recovery

doi:10.12307/2022.747

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw internal fixation is one of the main first choices for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. The therapeutic effects of percutaneous pedicle screw, Wiltse approach, and conventional approach remain in controversy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effects of percutaneous pedicle screw, Wiltse approach, and conventional approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients with thoracolumbar fractures admitted to First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from February 2017 to October 2019 was performed. A total of 46 cases were enrolled and all received pedicle screw internal fixation, of which 15 cases received percutaneous screw placement, 17 cases through the Wiltse approach, and 14 cases through the posterior median approach. Serum creatine kinase level, visual analogue scale score, Qswestry dysfunction index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, the relative height of the anterior edge of the injured vertebrae and the sagittal kyphotic Cobb angle were compared before and after the operation in the three groups.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) All 46 patients underwent surgeries successfully with no complications such as internal fixation breakage. (2) The creatine kinase levels of the three groups 3 days after operation were higher than those before operation (P < 0.05). The level of creatine kinase at 3 days after operation was percutaneous pedicle screw group < Wiltse approach group < posterior median approach group (P < 0.05). (3) The visual analogue scale scores, Qswestry dysfunction index, and JOA scores of the three groups after surgery were significantly improved compared with those before surgery (P < 0.05). At 3 days after operation and the internal fixation removal, the Qswestry dysfunction index and JOA score of the percutaneous pedicle screw group were better than those of the Wiltse approach group and the posterior median approach group (P < 0.05). Qswestry dysfunction index and JOA score were better in the Wiltse approach group than those of the posterior median approach group (P < 0.05). (4) The relative height of the anterior edge of the injured vertebrae and the sagittal kyphotic Cobb angle of the three groups were significantly improved 3 days after operation and after the internal fixation removal compared with those before surgery (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the relative height of the anterior edge of the injured vertebrae and the sagittal kyphotic Cobb angle between the three groups after surgery (P > 0.05). (5) These results indicate that the percutaneous pedicle screw and Wiltse approach have little effect on the paravertebral muscles compared with conventional approach, and it is more conducive to the postoperative functional recovery of patients with thoracolumbar fractures.

Key words: thoracolumbar fracture, surgical treatment, pedicle screw, surgical approach, Wiltse approach, posterior median approach, clinical effect

CLC Number:

Song Dawei, Yu Hao, Yang Ming, Xie Haifeng, Wu Cenhao, Yan Qi, Wang Yingjie, Yang Huilin, Geng Dechun, Niu Junjie, Wang Jinning. Three approaches of pedicle screw internal fixation for thoracolumbar fractures: spinal function, vertebral height reduction and local Cobb angle recovery[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2022, 26(36): 5844-5848.

Figures/Tables 6

References

[1] SPIEGL UJ, JOSTEN C, DEVITT BM, et al. Incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a review of literature. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(12):3187-3198.
[2] RAJASEKARAN S, KANNA RM, SHETTY AP. Management of thoracolumbar spine trauma: An overview. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49(1):72-82.
[3] GE DH, STEKAS ND, VARLOTTA CG, et al. Comparative Analysis of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques: Open TLIF Versus Wiltse MIS TLIF. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44(9):E555-E560.
[4] SHEINIS D, SHEINIS V, BENHARROCH D, et al. Incidental Durotomy Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Performed with the Modified Wiltse Approach. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2020;81(5):399-403.
[5] 王根林,张福占,谢计乐,等.Wiltse肌间隙入路联合伤椎置钉治疗胸腰段骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2015,17(12):1047-1052.
[6] GAZZERI R. Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Technique in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine-Tips and Tricks. Surg Technol Int. 2016;28:303-310.
[7] LIU YL, MEHRA RN, CHOU D. Navigated minimally invasive facet fusion during percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw insertion: Technical note. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;71:257-262.
[8] HEINTEL TM, BERGLEHNER A, MEFFERT R. Accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screws for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: a prospective trial. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(3):495-502.
[9] DU JY, KIELY PD, BOGNER E, et al. Early clinical and radiological results of unilateral posterior pedicle instrumentation through a Wiltse approach with lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Spine Surg. 2017;3(3):338-348.
[10] GUIROY A, SÍCOLI A, MASANÉS NG, et al. How to perform the Wiltse posterolateral spinal approach: Technical note. Surg Neurol Int. 2018;9:38.
[11] GEJO R, MATSUI H, KAWAGUCHI Y, et al. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(10):1023-1028.
[12] WOOD KB, LI W, LEBL DR, et al. Management of thoracolumbar spine fractures. Spine J. 2014;14(1):145-164.
[13] HUSSAIN NS, PEREZ-CRUET MJ. Complication management with minimally invasive spine procedures. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;31(4):E2.
[14] KORECKIJ T, PARK DK, FISCHGRUND J. Minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine trauma. Neurosurg Focus. 2014; 37(1):E11.
[15] LEE KH, YUE WM, YEO W, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2012; 21(11):2265-2270.
[16] GELB D, LUDWIG S, KARP JE, et al. Successful treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with short-segment pedicle instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010; 23(5):293-301.
[17] TIAN JW, WANG L, XIA T, et al. Posterior short-segmental fixation combined with intermediate screws vs conventional intersegmental fixation for monosegmental thoracolumbar fractures. Orthopedics. 2011;34(8):e389-396.
[18] 王金宁,宋达炜,乔渝森,等.胸腰段脊柱骨折内固定:经伤椎与跨伤椎短节段经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定系统的应用[J].中国组织工程研究, 2019,23(28):4479-4484.
[19] DAHDALEH NS, SMITH ZA, HITCHON PW. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014;25(2):337-346.
[20] KOCIS J, KELBL M, KOCIS T, et al. Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020; 46(1):147-152.
[21] TIAN F, TU LY, GU WF, et al. Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw instrumentation in treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(41): e12535.
[22] ZHAO Q, ZHANG H, HAO D, et al. Complications of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in treating thoracolumbar and lumbar fracture. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(29):e11560.