中国组织工程研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (20): 3256-3264.doi: 10.12307/2022.630
• 组织构建综述 tissue construction review • 上一篇 下一篇
王佳伟,刘 晔
收稿日期:
2021-07-06
修回日期:
2021-07-08
接受日期:
2021-08-19
出版日期:
2022-07-18
发布日期:
2022-01-20
通讯作者:
刘晔,博士,教授,北京体育大学运动人体科学学院,北京市 100084
作者简介:
王佳伟,男,1994年生,福建省泉州市人,汉族,北京体育大学在读硕士,主要从事运动协调与技术动作优化研究。
基金资助:
Wang Jiawei, Liu Ye
Received:
2021-07-06
Revised:
2021-07-08
Accepted:
2021-08-19
Online:
2022-07-18
Published:
2022-01-20
Contact:
Liu Ye, PhD, Professor, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China
About author:
Wang Jiawei, Master candidate, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China
Supported by:
摘要:
文题释义:
运动协调:人体通过调节神经-肌肉-关节三者间的关系,整合多个自由度以控制肢体动作的能力。
运动协调研究应用领域:除了运动科学领域,运动协调研究在神经科学、运动控制、运动康复、机器人学等领域均有应用,决定了这一研究问题的多学科属性,尤其在组织工程研究中,掌握神经-关节-肌肉三者的协调控制规律,可为肌肉及其他器官的再造或修复提供研究基础。
背景:运动协调是人体运动能力的重要组成部分,探索其规律对了解人体在运动中的神经-肌肉-关节三者的协调控制具有重要意义。
目的:通过系统分析国内外关于运动协调的研究文献,梳理运动协调理论模型和量化方法的演进过程。
方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、EBSCO、CNKI中国期刊全文数据库收录的相关文献,英文检索词主要为“motor coordination,segment coordination,muscle synergy,equilibrium point,uncontrolled manifold”,中文检索词主要为“运动协调,关节耦合,关节协调,肌肉协同,矢量编码,运动控制”,检索时间不限,最终纳入111篇文献进行归纳总结。
结果与结论:目前在运动协调理论模型中,动态系统理论、非控制流形假说、肌肉协同假说的应用最广、价值最大,对应的量化方法也不断演进,其中连续性分析方法对探究周期与非周期性相对运动的关节协调特征具有较大潜力,肌肉协同分析方法可用于识别不同人群的肌肉协同策略。建议中国的运动协调能力研究,在提高基础理论探索与各类量化方法使用的基础上,结合分析关节协调模式和神经肌肉的协同控制策略,以更好地了解神经-肌肉-关节三者的协调规律。
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9265-317X (刘晔)
中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:组织构建;骨细胞;软骨细胞;细胞培养;成纤维细胞;血管内皮细胞;骨质疏松;组织工程
中图分类号:
王佳伟, 刘 晔. 运动协调理论模型与量化方法的演进[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2022, 26(20): 3256-3264.
Wang Jiawei, Liu Ye. Motor coordination: evolution of theoretical model and quantitative method[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2022, 26(20): 3256-3264.
[1] FREITAS D L, LAUSEN B, MAIA J A, et al. Skeletal Maturation, Body Size, and Motor Coordination in Youth 11-14 Years. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(6):1129-1135. [2] BERNSTEIN NA. The co-ordination and regulation of movements. London: Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1967. [3] NEILSON PD, HOSP PH, NEILSON MD, et al. What limits high speed tracking performance? Hum Mov Sci. 1993;12(1-2): 85-109. [4] NEILSON PD, NEILSON MD, O’DWYER NJ. Motor Control and Sensory Motor Integration - Issues and Directions Volume 111 II Chapter 5 Adaptive optimal control of human tracking. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1995;111:97-140. [5] VAN EMMERIK REA, ROSENSTEIN MT, MCDERMOTT W J, et al. A Nonlinear Dynamics Approach to Human Movement. J Appl Biomech. 2004;20(4):396-420. [6] LASHLEY KS. Basic neural mechanisms in behavior. Psychol Rev. 1930;37(1):1-24. [7] CISEK P. Neural representations of motor plans, desired trajectories, and controlled objects. Cogn Process. 2005;6(1):15-24. [8] LATASH ML. Two Archetypes of Motor Control Research. Motor Control. 2010; 14(3):e41-e53. [9] WONG AL, HAITH AM, KRAKAUER JW. Motor Planning. Neuroscientist. 2015;21(4): 385-398. [10] LATASH ML, LEVIN MF, SCHOLZ JP, et al. Motor control theories and their applications. Med Lith. 2010;46(6):382-392. [11] D’AVELLA A, SALTIEL P, BIZZI E. Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6(3):300-308. [12] TING LH, MACPHERSON JM. A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93(1):609-613. [13] D’AVELLA A. Modularity for Motor Control and Motor Learning. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;957:3-19. [14] LEE WA. Neuromotor synergies as a basis for coordinated intentional action. J Mot Behav. 1984;16(2): 135-170. [15] BIZZI E, MUSSA-IVALDI F A, GISZTER S. Computations underlying the execution of movement: a biological perspective. Science. 1991;253(5017):287-291. [16] SHERRINGTON C. The Integrative Action of the Nervous System. Nature. 1947; 160(4071):623-624. [17] TRESCH M C, SALTIEL P, BIZZI E. The construction of movement by the spinal cord. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2(2):162-167. [18] SALTIEL P, WYLER-DUDA K, D’AVELLA A, et al. Muscle Synergies Encoded Within the Spinal Cord Evidence From Focal Intraspin. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85(2):605-619. [19] OVERDUIN SA, D’AVELLA A, CARMENA JM, et al. Microstimulation activates a handful of muscle synergies. Neuron. 2012;76(6):1071-1077. [20] D’AVELLA A, PORTONE A, LACQUANITI F. Superposition and modulation of muscle synergies for reaching in response to a change in target location. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106(6):2796-2812. [21] HAMILL J, VAN EMMERIK RE, HEIDERSCHEIT BC, et al. A dynamical systems approach to lower extremity running injuries. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999;14(5):297-308. [22] ANNESHUMWAY-COOK, MARJORIEH. WOOLLACOTT. 运动控制原理与实践 [M]. 毕胜,燕铁斌,王宁华,译.3版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2009. [23] ROH J, CHEUNG VC, BIZZI E. Modules in the brain stem and spinal cord underlying motor behaviors. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106(3):1363-1378. [24] BIZZI E, CHEUNG VC. The neural origin of muscle synergies. Front Comput Neurosci. 2013;7:51. [25] OVERDUIN SA, D’AVELLA A, ROH J, et al. Representation of Muscle Synergies in the Primate Brain. J Neurosci. 2015;35(37):12615-12624. [26] IVANENKO YP, POPPELE RE, LACQUANITI F. Spinal cord maps of spatiotemporal alpha-motoneuron activation in humans walking at different speeds. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95(2):602-618. [27] SANTUZ A, EKIZOS A, JANSHEN L, et al. Modular Control of Human Movement During Running: An Open Access Data Set. Front Physiol. 2018; 9:1509. [28] LATASH ML. The Hand: Shall We Ever Understand How It Works? Motor Control. 2015;19(2):108-126. [29] 林辉杰.掷铁饼动作中人体运动协调特征研究[D].上海:上海体育学院,2013. [30] 辜禹,陈楠,刘倩,等.肌肉协同理论在小儿脑性瘫痪康复评定中的应用进展[J].中国康复理论与实践,2020,26(6):673-677. [31] PEREZ-NOMBELA S, BARROSO F, TORRICELLI D, et al. Modular control of gait after incomplete spinal cord injury: differences between sides. Spinal Cord. 2017; 55(1):79-86. [32] MILETI I, ZAMPOGNA A, SANTUZ A, et al. Muscle Synergies in Parkinson’s Disease. Sensors (Basel). 2020;20(11):3209. [33] NAZIFI MM, YOON HU, BESCHORNER K, et al. Shared and Task-Specific Muscle Synergies during Normal Walking and Slipping. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:40. [34] SANTUZ A, AKAY T, MAYER W P, et al. Modular organization of murine locomotor pattern in the presence and absence of sensory feedback from muscle spindles. J Physiol. 2019;597(12):3147-3165. [35] FELDMAN AG. On the functional tuning of the nervous system in movement control or preservation of stationary pose. II. Adjustable parameters in muscles. Biofizika. 1966;11(3):498-508. [36] FELDMAN AG. Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (lambda model) for motor control. J Mot Behav. 1986;18(1):17-54. [37] FELDMAN AG. Space and time in the context of equilibrium-point theory. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011;2(3):287-304. [38] FLASH T. The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements. Biol Cybern. 1987;57(4-5):257-274. [39] FELDMAN A G, KRASOVSKY T, BANINA M C, et al. Changes in the referent body location and configuration may underlie human gait, as confirmed by findings of multi-muscle activity minimizations and phase resetting. Exp Brain Res. 2011; 210(1):91-115. [40] ASATRIAN D G, FEL’DMAN A G. On the functional structure of the nervous system during movement control or preservation of a stationary posture. I. Mechanographic analysis of the action of a joint during the performance of a postural task. Biofizika. 1965;10(5):837-846. [41] FELDMAN AG, LEVIN MF. The Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis—past, present and future. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;629:699-726. [42] LATASH ML. Motor synergies and the Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis. Motor Control. 2010;14(3):294-322. [43] POPESCU FC, RYMERI WZ. Implications of low mechanical impedance in upper limb reaching motion. Motor Control. 2003;7(4):323-327. [44] SAINBURG R L. Should the Equilibrium Point Hypothesis (EPH) be Considered a Scientific Theory? Motor Control. 2015;19(2):142-148. [45] LATASH M L. Fifty Years of Physics of Living Systems. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016; 957:81-103. [46] DE SA FARDILHA F. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Br J Sports Med. 2020;64:12. [47] FELDMAN A G, GOUSSEV V, SANGOLE A, et al. Threshold position control and the principle of minimal interaction in motor actions. Prog Brain Res. 2007;165:267-281. [48] PILON J F, FELDMAN AG. Threshold control of motor actions prevents destabilizing effects of proprioceptive delays. Exp Brain Res. 2006;174(2):229-239. [49] OSTRY DJ, FELDMAN AG. A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control. Exp Brain Res. 2003;153(3):275-288. [50] 王爱文,罗冬梅.人体运动控制理论及计算模型的研究进展[J].体育科学, 2017,37(8):58-68. [51] MORASSO P, CASADIO M, MOHAN V, et al. Revisiting the body-schema concept in the context of whole-body postural-focal dynamics. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:83. [52] SCHMIDT RA. A Schema Theory of Discrete Motor Skill Learning. Psychol Rev. 1975;82(4):225-260. [53] SHEA CH, WULF G. Schema theory: a critical appraisal and reevaluation. J Mot Behav. 2005;37(2):85-101. [54] NEWELL KM. Schema theory (1975): retrospectives and prospectives. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003;74(4):383-388. [55] SHERWOOD DE, LEE TD. Schema theory: critical review and implications for the role of cognition in a new theory of motor learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003;74(4):376-382. [56] MEIGH KM. A Novel Investigation of Generalized Motor Program Theory: Syllable Stress as a Motor-Class Variable. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(6S):1685-1694. [57] PLANT KL, STANTON NA. The explanatory power of Schema Theory: theoretical foundations and future applications in Ergonomics. Ergonomics. 2013;56(1):1-15. [58] VAN OPSTAL AJ. Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. J Cogn Neurosci. 1996;8(4):385-386. [59] KUGLER PN, TURVEY MT. Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1987. [60] 林辉杰,严波涛,刘占锋,等.运动协调的定量方法以及在专项技术分析领域的研究进展[J].体育科学,2012,32(3):81-91. [61] 李立,文椈,傅维杰.运动中动态系统视角下的变异性及稳定性[J].天津体育学院学报,2014,29(2):105-107+112. [62] KING AC, HANNAN KB. Segment Coordination Variability During Double Leg Bodyweight Squats at Different Tempos. Int J Sports Med. 2019;40(11):725-731. [63] HAMILL J, PALMER C, VAN EMMERIK RE. Coordinative variability and overuse injury. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012;4(1):45. [64] LATASH ML, SCHOLZ JP, SCHONER G. Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Motor Control. 2007;11(3):276-308. [65] SCHOLZ JP, SCHONER G. The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res. 1999;126(3):289-306. [66] LATASH M. There is no motor redundancy in human movements. There is motor abundance. Motor Control. 2000;4(3):259-260. [67] LATASH ML. Synergy. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2008. [68] MARTIN V, SCHOLZ JP, SCHONER G. Redundancy, self-motion, and motor control. Neural Comput. 2009;21(5):1371-1414. [69] ALEXANDER RM. A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories. Biol Cybern. 1997;76(2):97-105. [70] CLARK DJ, TING LH, ZAJAC FE, et al. Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103(2):844-857. [71] CHEUNG VC, TUROLLA A, AGOSTINI M, et al. Muscle synergy patterns as physiological markers of motor cortical damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(36):14652-14656. [72] 桂奇政,孟明,马玉良,等.基于肌肉协同激活模型的上肢关节运动连续估计[J].仪器仪表学报,2016,37(6): 1405-1412. [73] 杨毅,彭玉鑫,郝增明,等.复杂人体运动冗余控制的肌肉协同理论研究进展与展望[J].体育科学,2020,40(12):63-72. [74] 黄威,高云园,张迎春,等.基于非负矩阵分解和复杂网络的肌间耦合分析[J].航天医学与医学工程,2019,32(2):159-66. [75] STEELE KM, ROZUMALSKI A, SCHWARTZ MH. Muscle synergies and complexity of neuromuscular control during gait in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57(12):1176-1182. [76] ROZUMALSKI A, STEELE KM, SCHWARTZ MH. Muscle synergies are similar when typically developing children walk on a treadmill at different speeds and slopes. J Biomech. 2017;64:112-119. [77] SAITO A, TOMITA A, ANDO R, et al. Similarity of muscle synergies extracted from the lower limb including the deep muscles between level and uphill treadmill walking. Gait Posture. 2018;59:134-139. [78] HUG F, TURPIN NA, GUEVEL A, et al. Is interindividual variability of EMG patterns in trained cyclists related to different muscle synergies? J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010;108(6):1727-1736. [79] TURPIN NA, GUEVEL A, DURAND S, et al. Effect of power output on muscle coordination during rowing. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(12):3017-3029. [80] KRISTIANSEN M, SAMANI A, MADELEINE P, et al. Effects of 5 Weeks of Bench Press Training on Muscle Synergies: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(7):1948-1959. [81] 林辉杰,严波涛,许崇高.基于Bernstein运动协调观的优秀女子铁饼运动员“神经-肌肉”协调能力特征研究[J].天津体育学院学报,2014,29(6):489-495. [82] RABBI MF, PIZZOLATO C, LLOYD DG, et al. Non-negative matrix factorisation is the most appropriate method for extraction of muscle synergies in walking and running. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):8266. [83] ELMEUA GONZALEZ M, SARABON N. Muscle modes of the equestrian rider at walk, rising trot and canter. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237727. [84] DICESARE CA, MINAI AA, RILEY MA, et al. Distinct Coordination Strategies Associated with the Drop Vertical Jump Task. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020;52(5):1088-1098. [85] NORDIN AD, DUFEK JS. Neuromechanical synergies in single-leg landing reveal changes in movement control. Hum Mov Sci. 2016;49:66-78. [86] LAMBERT-SHIRZAD N, VAN DER LOOS HF. On identifying kinematic and muscle synergies: a comparison of matrix factorization methods using experimental data from the healthy population. J Neurophysiol. 2017;117(1):290-302. [87] 于海阔,董立,杨昆,等.基于功能MRI扩散张量成像的联合独立成分分析对阿尔茨海默病的多模态评估[J].中华放射学杂志,2019,53(8):642-647. [88] 刘越,王梦星,杜小霞,等.基于独立成分分析的遗尿症儿童脑功能网络研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(3):382-386. [89] THONGPANJA S, PHINYOMARK A, QUAINE F, et al. Probability Density Functions of Stationary Surface EMG Signals in Noisy Environments. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2016;65(7):1547-1557. [90] SAITO A, WATANABE K, AKIMA H. Coordination among thigh muscles including the vastus intermedius and adductor magnus at different cycling intensities. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;40:14-23. [91] DAVIS BL, VAUGHAN CL. Phasic behavior of EMG signals during gait: use of multivariate statistics. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1993;3(1):51-60. [92] TURPIN NA, URIAC S, DALLEAU G. How to improve the muscle synergy analysis methodology? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121(4):1009-1025. [93] ANTUVAN CW, BISIO F, MARINI F, et al. Role of Muscle Synergies in Real-Time Classification of Upper Limb Motions using Extreme Learning Machines. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;3(1):76. [94] 徐睿,梁循,齐金山,等.极限学习机前沿进展与趋势[J].计算机学报,2019, 42(7):1640-1670. [95] BELOUCHRANI A, ABED-MERAIM K, CARDOSO JF. A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 1997;45(2):434-444. [96] STERGIOU N, HARBOURNE R, CAVANAUGH J. Optimal movement variability: a new theoretical perspective for neurologic physical therapy. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006;30:120-129. [97] HAMILL J, HADDAD JM, MCDERMOTT WJ. Issues in quantifying Variability From a Dynamical Systems Perspective. J Appl Biomech. 2000;16(4):407-418. [98] KELSO JA, JEKA JJ. Symmetry breaking dynamics of human multilimb coordination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992;18(3):645-668. [99] GRIEVE DW, GEAR RJ. The relationships between length of stride, step frequency, time of swing and speed of walking for children and adults. Ergonomics. 1966; 9(5):379-399. [100] TEPAVAC D, FIELD-FOTE EC. Vector Coding: A Technique for Quantification of Intersegmental Coupling in Multicyclic Behaviors. J Appl Biomech. 2001;17(3): 259-370. [101] MAGILL RA, ANDERSON D. Motor Learning and Control Concepts and Applications. 11 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2016. [102] SPARROW WA, DONOVAN E, VAN EMMERIK R, et al. Using relative motion plots to measure changes in intra-limb and inter-limb coordination. J Mot Behav. 1987; 19(1):115-129. [103] CHANG R, VAN EMMERIK R, HAMILL J. Quantifying rearfoot-forefoot coordination in human walking. J Biomech. 2008;41(14):3101-3105. [104] BUTTON C, WHEAT J, LAMB P. Why coordination dynamics is relevant for studying sport performance. Complex systems in sport. 2014:44-61. [105] HARRISON AJ, RYAN W, HAYES K. Functional data analysis of joint coordination in the development of vertical jump performance. Sports Biomech. 2007;6(2):199-214. [106] MULLINEAUX D R, BARTLETT RM, BENNETT S. Research design and statistics in biomechanics and motor control. J Sports Sci. 2001;19(10):739-760. [107] 张百发,周兴龙,席健夫,等.幼儿前滑步动作发展特征的函数型数据分析[J].体育科学,2019,39(11):48-56. [108] HUGHES G, WATKINS J. Lower limb coordination and stiffness during landing from volleyball block jumps. Res Sports Med. 2008;16(2):138-154. [109] WANG Y, WATANABE K, ASAKA T. Effect of dance on multi-muscle synergies in older adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):340. [110] BLACK DP, SMITH BA, WU J, et al. Uncontrolled manifold analysis of segmental angle variability during walking: preadolescents with and without Down syndrome. Exp Brain Res. 2007;183(4):511-521. [111] ZHOU T, ZHANG L, LATASH ML. Intentional and unintentional multi-joint movements: their nature and structure of variance. Neuroscience. 2015;289:181-193. |
No related articles found! |
1.1.8 检索文献量 共检索到文献2 681篇。
1.2 入选标准
纳入标准:①入选文献摘要内容与运动协调或运动控制领域的研究高度相关;②文献类型为在权威杂志发表的期刊论文、学位论文、综述及经典文献;③据文章题目及摘要进行初步筛选,通过文献精读和泛读后设计提炼出与文章相关的研究论文、综述及论著。
排除标准:①与此次综述相关性不强的文献;②重复性研究。
1.3 文献筛选过程 计算机初步共检索到文献2 681篇,通过阅读文题和摘要进行初步筛选,排除不同数据库以及平台中与研究目的相关性差、质量不高、重复的文献2 570篇,纳入111篇符合标准的文献进行综述,其中英文文献97篇,中文文献14篇,见图4。
文题释义:
运动协调:人体通过调节神经-肌肉-关节三者间的关系,整合多个自由度以控制肢体动作的能力。
运动协调研究应用领域:除了运动科学领域,运动协调研究在神经科学、运动控制、运动康复、机器人学等领域均有应用,决定了这一研究问题的多学科属性,尤其在组织工程研究中,掌握神经-关节-肌肉三者的协调控制规律,可为肌肉及其他器官的再造或修复提供研究基础。
肢体协调又称为关节协调,其特点之一是存在变异性。在肌肉协调中,协同是对自由度的组织,而冗余自由度被认为是产生变异性的主要原因。协同将冗余自由度组织成一个控制单元,但由于肌肉骨骼和神经运动系统的冗余性,不同协调模式或协调模式的微小变化可用于完成相同的任务,导致协调变异性。
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||