中国组织工程研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (36): 5787-5791.doi: 10.12307/2021.343

• 人工假体 artificial prosthesis • 上一篇    下一篇

结构性植骨应用于Paprosky ⅢA型髋臼骨缺损髋关节翻修

许志庆,庄至坤,龚志兵,吴荣凯,林行会,吴昭克   

  1. 福建省泉州市正骨医院关节外科,福建省泉州市   362000
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-16 修回日期:2020-12-19 接受日期:2021-01-27 出版日期:2021-12-28 发布日期:2021-09-17
  • 通讯作者: 吴昭克,主任医师,福建省泉州市正骨医院关节外科,福建省泉州市 362000
  • 作者简介:许志庆,男,1990年生,福建省泉州市人,汉族,2015年福建中医药大学毕业,硕士,主治医师,主要从事中西医结合治疗骨与关节疾病方面的研究。

Structural bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky IIIA acetabular defect

Xu Zhiqing, Zhuang Zhikun, Gong Zhibing, Wu Rongkai, Lin Hanghui, Wu Zhaoke   

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Quanzhou Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital of Fujian, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian Province, China
  • Received:2020-12-16 Revised:2020-12-19 Accepted:2021-01-27 Online:2021-12-28 Published:2021-09-17
  • Contact: Wu Zhaoke, Chief physician, Department of Orthopedics, Quanzhou Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital of Fujian, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian Province, China
  • About author:Xu Zhiqing, Master, Attending physician, Department of Orthopedics, Quanzhou Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital of Fujian, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian Province, China

摘要:

文题释义:

髋臼骨缺损Paprosky分型:Ⅰ型:极少量骨量丢失,髋关节旋转中心无移位,髋臼承重结构及前后柱完整。Ⅱ型:中等骨量丢失,旋转中心移位< 3 cm,髋臼上缘及内侧壁骨量丢失而前后柱完整,髋臼缘不完整而仍能支撑髋臼杯半球结构(ⅡA型髋臼顶部结构完整,ⅡB型旋转中心上移及内移,髋臼上缘骨缺损;ⅡC型旋转中心内移,髋臼内侧骨缺损)。Ⅲ型:存在严重骨缺损,旋转中心移位> 3 cm,同时累及髋臼周围所有承重结构,并常伴有骨盆不连续(ⅢA型中重度骨缺损,累及整个髋臼缘及髋臼后柱,旋转中心侧上方移位,30%-60%承重骨骨量丢失;ⅢB型指重度骨缺损,累及整个髋臼缘及前后柱,旋转中心内后移位,60%以上承重骨骨量丢失)。
结构性植骨:同种类但不同个体为供体(此文特指人),经过深低温冷冻干燥、辐射灭菌等系列处理,常用于骨科手术增强固定、弥补骨缺损。同种异体股骨头移植早期主要起固定作用,后期与宿主骨愈合可增加骨量,相较金属垫块具有可反复、任意塑形优点,可能发生免疫排斥反应。

背景:合并髋臼侧严重骨缺损的人工全髋关节翻修会出现假体安放困难、初始稳定性差、术后假体松动等问题,是关节外科医生面临的复杂且具有技术挑战的一大难题。
目的:观察同种异体股骨头结构性植骨应用于Paprosky ⅢA型髋臼骨缺损髋关节翻修的临床疗效。
方法:回顾分析2010年1月至2018年1月福建省泉州市正骨医院收治的15例(15髋)伴有Paprosky ⅢA型髋臼骨缺损的髋关节翻修患者,所有患者术中采用同种异体股骨头结构性植骨重建髋臼,术后均严格按照康复计划负重行走。术后7 d、6个月、1年及随后每年定期复查双髋正位、患髋侧位X射线片;评估髋臼杯覆盖率与植骨块覆盖率、髋关节旋转中心水平位移和垂直位移、植骨块愈合与吸收、髋臼杯的骨长入与松动、髋臼杯周围骨溶解、髋关节Harris评分等指标。

结果与结论:①所有患者随访时间2.5-10.0年;末次随访时髋关节Harris评分为(83.2±5.8)分,与术前(25.3±5.3)分比较,差异有显著性意义(t=28.739,P=0.000);②术后7 d髋臼杯覆盖率为91.7%-100%,平均(95.6±2.2)%;术后7 d植骨块覆盖率为21.5%-53.2%,平均(37.4±10.0)%;③术后7 d髋关节旋转中心水平位移为(5.8±1.7) mm,与术前(8.2±3.9) mm比较,差异有显著性意义(t=-2.128,P=0.042);术后7 d髋关节旋转中心垂直位移为(4.8±2.1) mm,与术前(22.2±4.2) mm比较,差异有显著性意义(t=-14.321,P=0.000);④术后6个月至1年4例(4髋)出现异体股骨头轻度吸收现象,吸收均位于外侧无应力分布区域,均未影响髋臼杯稳定;15例(15髋)异体股骨头与髋臼骨交界均有骨小梁连接;末次随访时异体股骨头与髋臼骨均呈骨性愈合,无不愈合现象;⑤15例(15髋)末次随访时髋臼杯均已获骨长入,而无假体松动表现,髋臼杯周围均无明显骨溶解表现;所有患者术后均未发生深静脉血栓、感染、神经损伤、脱位等并发症;⑥提示同种异体股骨头结构性植骨应用于Paprosky ⅢA型髋臼骨缺损髋关节翻修,可有效恢复髋臼骨缺损及重建髋臼,髋关节偏心距及旋转中心恢复较好,术后髋关节功能良好,并可获得良好的假体稳定性;早中期临床疗效满意,而远期疗效有待临床上进一步随访观察。

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9249-0841 (许志庆) 

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:人工关节;骨植入物;脊柱;骨折;内固定;数字化骨科;组织工程

关键词: 同种异体股骨头, 结构性植骨, Paprosky ⅢA型, 髋臼骨缺损, 髋关节翻修

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty with serious bone defect of acetabulum is complicated problem with technical challenges to joint surgeons, because of prosthetic installation difficulties, poor initial stability, postoperative prosthesis loosening.  
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of structural bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky IIIA acetabular defect.
METHODS:  Between January 2010 and January 2018, 15 patients (15 hips) with Paprosky IIIA acetabular defect underwent revision total hip arthroplasty by structural bone grafting. All patients underwent revision total hip arthroplasty, with intramedullary reconstruction of the acetabulum with allogeneic femoral head during operation and weight-bearing walking in strict accordance with the rehabilitation program after operation. Standardized hip radiographs were assessed postoperatively 7 days, and at 6 months, 1 year and annually thereafter. The following outcomes were assessed: acetabulum cup coverage, bone graft coverage, the height and horizontal distance of center of hip rotation, bone graft healing and absorption, bone ingrowth, cup loosening, periprosthetic osteolysis, and Harris hip score.  
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) All patients were followed up for 2.5-10.0 years. The Harris score of the hip joint at the last follow-up was (83.2±5.8) points; compared with the preoperative data (25.3±5.3) points, the difference was significant (t=28.739, P=0.000). (2) The coverage rate of the acetabular cup was 91.7%-100% at postoperative 7 days, with an average of (95.6±2.2)%. The coverage rate of the bone graft at postoperative 7 days was 21.5%-53.2%, with an average of (37.4±10.0)%. (3) The horizontal displacement of the hip joint rotation center at postoperative 7 days was (5.8±1.7) mm; compared with the preoperative data (8.2±3.9) mm, the difference was significant (t=-2.128, P=0.042). At postoperative 7 days, vertical displacement of the center of rotation was (4.8±2.1) mm; compared with (22.2±4.2) mm before operation, the difference was significant (t=-14.321, P=0.000). (4) From 6 months to 1 year after surgery, 4 cases (4 hips) had mild absorption of allogeneic femoral heads, and the absorption was all located in the lateral non-stress distribution area, and did not affect the stability of the acetabular cup. In 15 cases (15 hips), trabecular bone connection could be found in allogeneic femoral head and acetabular bone junction. At the last follow-up, allogeneic femoral head and acetabular bone presented bone union, no nonunion. (5) Fifteen patients (15 hips) showed bone ingrowth into acetabula cup, and no acetabular loosening occurred at latest follow-up. No osteolysis was observed in acetabular zone. There were no complications in all patients, without deep vein thrombosis, infection, neurological damage, or dislocation. (6) It is concluded that structural bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky IIIA acetabular defect can effectively restore acetabular bone defects and reconstruct acetabulum. The eccentricity and rotation center of the hip joint recovered well; the hip joint function was good after operation; and good prosthesis stability was obtained; the early and mid-term clinical efficacy was satisfactory, but the long-term efficacy needs further clinical follow-up observation.

Key words: allogeneic femoral head, structural bone grafting, Paprosky IIIA, acetabular defect, hip revision

中图分类号: