中国组织工程研究

中国组织工程研究 ›› 2011, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (31): 5739-5742.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.31.009

• 细胞与组织移植 cell and tissue transplantation • 上一篇    下一篇

胚胎移植与囊胚移植的临床结局分析

郝桂琴，李  蓉，耿  岚，许锦贝，杨伟洪   

  1. 北京大学深圳医院生殖医学科，广东省深圳市 518036
  • 收稿日期:2011-03-15 修回日期:2011-04-11 出版日期:2011-07-30 发布日期:2011-07-30
  • 通讯作者: 李蓉，教授、主任医师，北京大学深圳医院生殖医学科，广东省深圳市 518036 lrivf@163.com
  • 作者简介:郝桂琴★，女，1975年生，山西省榆次市人，汉族，2002年广州医学院毕业，硕士，主管技师，主要从事生殖医学研究。 zichen_baby@163.com mary_china@tom.com
  • 基金资助:

    深圳市科技计划项目非资助项目(201003054)。

Analysis of clinical outcomes for embryo transfer and blastocyst transfer

Hao Gui-qin, Li Rong, Geng Lan, Xu Jin-bei, Yang Wei-hong   

  1. Reproductive Medicine Department, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2011-03-15 Revised:2011-04-11 Online:2011-07-30 Published:2011-07-30
  • Contact: Li Rong, Professor, Chief physician, Reproductive Medicine Department, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China lrivf@163.com
  • About author:Hao Gui-qin★, Master, Technician in charge, Reproductive Medicine Department, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China zichen_baby@163.com mary_china@tom.com
  • Supported by:

    Non-funded Project of Shenzhen Municipal Science and Technology Plan, No. 201003054*

PDF

558

摘要：

背景：国内关于卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚移植的临床比较与分析大样本报道较少见。
目的：比较第2，3天卵裂期胚胎移植与第5天囊胚移植的临床结局。
方法：选择2008-01/2009-12北京大学深圳医院生殖医学科行体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子显微注射共1612周期，比较第2，3天卵裂期胚胎移植与第5天囊胚移植的临床妊娠率、胚胎种植率、流产率、多胎率、出生婴儿性别比例等差异。
结果与结论：第2，3，5天移植组分别195，1 162，255周期，临床妊娠率分别为33.33%，38.04%，44.71%，种植率分别为21.37%，24.70%，31.96%；第5天移植组临床妊娠率和种植率均高于第2，3天移植组(P < 0.05)；第2天移植组宫外孕发生率高于第3天移植组(P < 0.05)。3组流产、单卵双胎、多胎、早产及出生婴儿性别比例无差异。说明囊胚移植提高了临床妊娠率和种植率的同时，未增加流产、多胎、早产等风险，对男女性别比例的平衡无负面影响。

关键词: 体外受精, 移植, 卵裂, 囊胚, 妊娠

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: It is less reported in China about the clinical outcome of cleavage-stage embryo transfer and blastocyst transfer.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcome of the cleavage stage transfer and blastocyst transfer.
METHODS: 1 612 IVF/ICSI cycles treated in Peking University Shenzhen Hospital between January 2008 and December 2009 were included in the study. It was compared between D2/D3 cleavage stage transfer and D5 blastocyst transfer about clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, abortion rate, multiples and sex ratio of neonatal.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The cycle number of D2/D3/D5 group was 195, 1162 and 255. The clinical pregnancy rate was 33.33%, 38.04%, 44.71% respectively for three groups. The implantation rate was 21.37%, 24.70%, 31.96%. The clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate were higher in D5 group than in D2/3 group (P < 0.05). For ectopic pregnancy, the risk estimate was higher in D2 group than in D3 group. No statistically differences existed in regard to abortion, monozygotic twin, multiples, preterm birth and sex ratio of neonatal among three groups. It was demonstrated a higher pregnancy rate and implantation rate after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage stage transfer. At the same time, the risk of abortion, monozygotic twin, multiples, preterm birth had not increased. It had no adverse effect on the sex ratio of neonatal.

中图分类号: