中国组织工程研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (12): 2171-2174.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2010.12.020

• 组织工程口腔材料 tissue-engineered oral materials • 上一篇    下一篇

不同桩核材料对IPS-EmpressⅡ全瓷系统颜色的影响

王晓丽,聂二民,黄颖荷,刘  伟,张春元   

  1. 中山大学附属第一医院口腔科,广东省广州市 510080
  • 出版日期:2010-03-19 发布日期:2010-03-19
  • 通讯作者: 张春元,硕士,教授,中山大学附属第一医院口腔科,广东省广州市 510080
  • 作者简介:王晓丽★,女,1983年生,河南省洛阳市人,汉族,硕士,主要从事口腔修复学方面研究。 niean_1999@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    广东省科技厅社会发展项目(2008B080703032),课题名称:口腔生物力学循环测试机的实验研究。

Influence of different post and core materials on the color of IPS-EmpressⅡ ceramic system

Wang Xiao-li, Nie Er-min, Huang Ying-he, Liu Wei, Zhang Chun-yuan   

  1. Department of Stomatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou  510080, Guangdong Province, China
  • Online:2010-03-19 Published:2010-03-19
  • Contact: Zhang Chun-yuan, Master, Professor, Department of Stomatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
  • About author:Wang Xiao-li★, Master, Department of Stomatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China niean_1999@163.com
  • Supported by:

    Social Development Plan of Guangdong Science and Technology Department, No. 2008B080703032*

摘要:

背景:研究表明,不同桩核材料对IPS-EmpressⅡ全瓷冠系统美观修复效果有一定程度的影响。
目的:比较IPS-EmpressⅡ全瓷冠在4种不同的桩核材料背景下色彩学方面的差异,为临床选择不同的桩核系统以及应用该全瓷系统提供依据。
方法:选取1颗完整离体上颌中切牙,进行桩道、4种不同材料桩核以及一个IPS-EmpressⅡ全瓷冠的制备,分为4组:镍铬合金桩核组、金合金桩核组、氧化锆桩铸瓷核组、纤维桩树脂核组。采用美能达CM-700d分光测色仪,测试4组不同桩核材料背景下IPS-EmpressⅡ全瓷冠唇面中1/3区域的颜色参数。
结果与结论:4种不同的桩核材料背景下IPS-EmpressⅡ全瓷冠的L*a*b*值的差异有显著性意义。镍铬合金桩核组的色差大于金合金桩核组,均超过临床可接受水平(△E>2),氧化锆桩铸瓷核组色差大于纤维桩树脂核组,处于临床可接受范围内,但纤维桩树脂核组色差肉眼不能识别其差异(△E<1.5)。在临床应用IPS-EmpressⅡ全瓷冠修复根管治疗后的上前牙时,推荐使用纤维桩树脂核,可以考虑使用全瓷桩核,不建议使用金属桩核。

关键词: 纤维桩树脂核, 全瓷桩核, 金属桩核, IPS-EmpressⅡ全瓷冠, 颜色, 口腔生物材料  

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that there are some influences of different post and core materials on the aesthetic effect of IPS-EmpressⅡceramic system.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the color of IPS-EmpressⅡ ceramic system among four kinds of post and core materials and to provide guidance for the clinical use.
METHODS: An intact central incisor was selected from upper jaw. The post path, four kinds of post and core materials, and a crown with IPS-EmpressⅡ ceramic were prepared. There were four groups according to the material: Ni-Cr alloy, golden alloy, ceramic post-and-core, and resin core with fiber-post groups. The CM-700d spectrophotometric tester was used to test the color parameter for the four groups.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There were significant difference of the L*a*b* value in four groups with different post-and-core. The △E value in the Ni-Cr alloy group was larger than in the golden alloy group, beyond the level that could be accepted in clinic (△E > 2). The △E value in the all ceramic post-and-core group was larger than in the resin core with fiber-post group, accepted in clinic, but the color difference could not be identified by the naked eye (△E < 1.5). In combination with IPS-EmpressⅡ crown, resin core with fiber post was suitable for routine use, all ceramic post-and-core could be recommended, but Ni-Cr alloy and golden alloy post-and-core could not be recommended for clinical practice.

中图分类号: