Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation versus traditional open surgeries for treatment of gluteal muscle contracture: a meta analysis

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.33.028

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: A large number of studies have reported that endoscopic radiofrequency ablation surgeries were better than traditional open surgeries for gluteal muscle contracture, but there is no meta-analysis on the clinical outcomes of endoscopic surgeries versus traditional open surgeries.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation surgeries versus traditional open surgeries in the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture.
METHODS: Eligible studies were identified from electronic databases including EMbase, Medline, PubMed, OVID, Cochrane Library, Springerlink, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP between January 1970 and May 2014. The literatures about the clinical efficacy of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation surgeries versus traditional open surgeries in the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture were retrieved. We screened the retrieved literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and performed a Meta analysis with the software RevMan 5.2 after identification of the relevant data.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 830 patients from 14 studies were included for the analysis, including 394 patients who underwent endoscopic surgeries and 436 patients who underwent traditional open surgeries. Among the main outcomes measured, the incidence of postoperative pain (relative risk=0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-0.42, P < 0.001) and postoperative complications (odds ratio=0.40, 95%CI: 0.23-0.70, P=0.001) in the endoscopic surgery group were significantly lower than that in the traditional open surgery group. The curative effects showed no significant difference between the two groups (odds ratio=1.09, 95%CI: 0.52-2.26, P=0.82). Among the secondary outcomes measured, the incision length, postoperative off-bed activity time and postoperative hospitalization in the endoscopic surgery group were significantly better than that in the traditional open surgery group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the surgery duration and recurrence rate (P > 0.05) between the two groups. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation surgeries are similar to traditional open surgeries in the curative effects, recurrence rate and surgery duration, and are better than traditional open surgeries in the incisional length, postoperative pain, postoperative off-bed activity time, postoperative hospitalization and postoperative complication.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：组织构建；骨细胞；软骨细胞；细胞培养；成纤维细胞；血管内皮细胞；骨质疏松；组织工程

全文链接：

Key words: hip, contracture, arthoscopy, treatment outcome, meta analysis

CLC Number:

R318

Ren Shi-you, Jiang Chang-qing, Li Wei, Zhang Wen-tao. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation versus traditional open surgeries for treatment of gluteal muscle contracture: a meta analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2014, 18(33): 5407-5412.

Figures/Tables 7

References

[1]余俊,叶斌.臀肌挛缩症的研究新进展[J].解剖与临床, 2012, 17(6): 524-526.
[2]李群伟,王绍萍,鲍文生,等.臀肌挛缩症病因流行病学研究[J].疾病控制杂志,2002,6(3):195-197.
[3]叶斌,陈友春.臀部软组织挛缩症的病因分析与治疗[J].伤残医学杂志,2001,9(1):19-21.
[4]吴维才,王以进,陈枫文,等.臀肌筋膜挛缩症的生物力学机制及其临床意义[J].中国矫形外科杂志,1999,6(10):753-755.
[5]张兰花,陈凯,王培军.臀肌挛缩症与髂骨致密性骨炎的关系[J].放射学实践,2011,26(8):872-874.
[6]秦泗河,彭爱民,陈建文,等.重度臀肌挛缩症继发骨与关节畸形[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2003,11(15):1078-1079.
[7]郑稼,罗建平,赵矩才,等.臀肌起点下移治疗臀肌挛缩症[J].中华骨科杂志,1999,19(8):479-480.
[8]杨景帆,常敏.关节镜下手术与传统开放手术治疗臀肌挛缩症的疗效比较[J].云南医药,2009,30(3):356-358.
[9]张文涛,王岩,王志刚,等.关节镜下软组织松解治疗臀肌挛缩症[J].中国临床康复,2002,6(12):1758-1759.
[10]Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT. Assessment of study quality: Cochran Reviewers’ handbook 4.2.2. Chichester, UK. 2004.
[11]郭勇,苏莲英,丁勇,等.关节镜下射频松解与开放手术治疗臀肌挛缩症疗效比较[J].西部医学,2014,26(2):234-236.
[12]Fu D, Yang S, Xiao B, et al. Comparison of endoscopic surgery and open surgery for gluteal muscle contracture. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(5):38-43.
[13]张有磊,刘崇志,李瑞,等.关节镜和切开手术治疗臀肌挛缩症的疗效对比[J].中国骨肿瘤骨病,2010,9(3):210-212.
[14]黎松波,刘先银,何沛恒.关节镜下汽化仪治疗与开放手术治疗臀肌挛缩症的临床疗效比较[J].中国实用医药,2010,5(11):72-74.
[15]颜欣心,蔡林.关节镜下射频与传统开放手术治疗臀肌挛缩症的近期疗效比较[J].中国病案,2010,11(10):15-17.
[16]袁平,王万春,陈游,等.关节镜下手术与传统开放手术治疗臀肌挛缩症的疗效比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(11):828-830.
[17]康明,郭汉明,王新光.关节镜下小切口和切开手术治疗臀肌挛缩症疗效观察[J].中国医药指南,2011,9(8):71-73.
[18]戴祝,陈志伟,唐正午,等.关节镜下与开放手术治疗青年臀肌挛缩的比较[J].中南医学科学杂志,2011,39(2):192-194.
[19]曲晓怡,高辉,孙秀江.关节镜下治疗臀肌挛缩症的临床观察[J].医学检验,2012,8:71-72.
[20]詹远平.关节镜与传统开放手术治疗臀肌挛缩症的比较研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2012,20(17):1564-1567.
[21]王晓旭,谭文甫,谭光华.关节镜与开放手术治疗臀肌挛缩症的临床疗效比较[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2011,25(5):633-634.
[22]卢斌,孟利娟,吴若丹,等.关节镜治疗臀肌挛缩与开放手术的疗效比较[J].中外医疗,2012,34:6-7.
[23]张晨,涂峰,鲁周同,等.两种手术方法治疗臀肌挛缩症的疗效分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2005,13(5):43-44.
[24]贺西京,李浩鹏,王栋,等.臀肌挛缩症的分级与治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2003,23(2):96-97.
[25]Zhao CG, He XJ, Lu B, et al. Classification of gluteal muscle contracture in children and outcome of different treatments. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:34.
[26]张忠,戴晓明,周清碧,等.微创手术治疗儿童注射性臀肌挛缩症[J].中国临床康复, 2005,9(3):222.
[27]陈耀龙,李幼平,杜亮,等.医学研究中证据分级和推荐强度的演进[J].中国循证医学杂志,2008,8(2):127-133.
[28]马承宣,房伦光,刘贵林,等.注射性臀大肌挛缩症[J].中华外科杂志, 1978,16(6):345.
[29]刘玉杰,王志刚,李众利,等.关节镜监视下射频汽化治疗注射性臀肌挛缩症的初步报告[J].中华骨科杂志,2003,23(3):150-152.
[30]刘玉杰,薛静,周密,等.关节镜下等离子刀微创治疗成年人注射性臀肌挛缩[J].中华外科杂志,2008,7(46):970-972.