Morphological changes of the smear layer after caries removal using different methods: An observation under scanning electron microscope

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.38.004

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The methods to remove the smear layer mainly include mechanical, Carisolv chemomechanical, laser, ozone methods and so on. But studies after caries removal are limited. At present, there is no research for the observation of the smear layer after caries removal using Er:YAG laser, Carisolv chemomechanical and traditional dental turbine.
OBJECTIVE: To observe the morphologic changes of the dentin smear layer after treated with the three methods of Er:YAG laser, Carisolv chemomechanical and traditional high speed dental turbine under a scanning electron microscope.
METHODS: Thirty newly removed premolars or molars with moderate caries were divided into three groups, 10 teeth in each group. The bottom surface of the tooth cavity was observed with the naked eyes after caries removal with Er:YAG laser, Carisolv chemomechanical and traditional dental turbine, respectively. Then, the surface was observed using the scanning electron microscope (magnification ×1 000 and ×2 000).
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The texture of the tooth cavity was hard in the three groups. After caries removal, the dentin surface of Er:YAG laser group was rough and uneven, and showed a peak-like shape; The dentin surface of Carisolv chemomechanical group was dark and the bottom was flat; The dentin surface of traditional dental turbine group was smooth and bright, and there was an obvious cutting trace. It was found that the surface of Er:YAG laser group did not have the smear layer, and the dentinal tubule was clearly visible. The most dentinal tubules were visible in the Carisolv chemomechanical group, and the surface was covered with a less smear layer. The surface of the traditional dental turbine group was covered with a thick smear layer, and the dentinal tubule was unseen. The differences in dentin smear layer cleanliness were significant between the three groups. These result indicate that Er:YAG laser can effectively remove the smear layer, which is better than Carisolv chemomechanical method and traditional dental turbine. Traditional dental turbine group is the worst among the three methods.

Key words: organism forms, mouth, dentin, lasers

CLC Number:

R318

Fang Ling, Zhu Yan-li. Morphological changes of the smear layer after caries removal using different methods: An observation under scanning electron microscope[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.38.004.

Figures/Tables 3

References

[1] Banerjee A,Watson TF,Kidd EA.Dentine caries excavation:a review of current clinical techniques.Br Dent J.2000;188(9): 476-482.
[2] Yazici AR,Ozgunaltay G,Dayangac B.A scanning electron microscopic study of different caries removal techniques on human dentin.Oper Dent.2002;27:360-366.
[3] 谢毓秀,王满恩,毛秀萍.国产气涡轮牙钻制备窝洞后人牙髓的即刻反应[J].北京医科大学学报:医学版,1988,20(3):215-217.
[4] 许文峰.浅谈微创无痛治疗在龋齿中的研究及应用[J].中国民族民间医药,2009,18(7):44.
[5] 吴友农,黄力子,史俊南.根管超声清理效果的扫描电镜评价[J].第四军医大学学报,1989,10(3):154-156.
[6] Pai VS,Nadig RR,Jagadeesh T,et al.Chemical analysis of dentin surfaces after Carisolv treatment.J Conserv Dent. 2009; 12(3):118-122.
[7] Tsanova STs,Tomov GT.Morphological changes in hard dental tissues prepared by Er:YAG laser (LiteTouch, Syneron), Carisolv and rotary instruments. A scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Folia Med (Plovdiv).2010; 52(3): 46-55.
[8] Meller C,Welk A,Zeligowski T,et al.Comparison ofdentin caries excavation with polymer and conventional tungsten carbide burs.Quintessence Int.2007;38(7):565-569.
[9] 郑向明,刘筱琳,胡德渝,等.Er:YAG激光在预防性树脂充填中的应用—扫描电镜研究[J].中国激光医学杂志,2003,12(4): 224-228.
[10] 吴为良,林实,姜醒,等.Er:YAG激光照射后牙本质粘结界面的剪切强度分析[J].福建医药杂志,2010,32(3):10-12.
[11] 欧晓艳,朱洪水.3 种方法去龋后牙本质玷污层扫描电镜观察[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2008,1(9):538-540.
[12] Peric T,Markovic D.In vitro effectiveness of a chemo-mechanical method for caries remova.Eur J Paediatr Dent.2007;8(2):61-67.
[13] Subramaniam P,Babu KL,Neeraja G.Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal ( Carisolv) with that of conventional drilling in reducing cariogenic flora.J Clin Pediatr Dent.2008;32(3): 215-219.
[14] Bulut G,Zekioglu O,Eronat C,et al.Effect of Carisolv on the human dental pulp: a histological study.J Dent.2004;32(4): 309-314.
[15] Aranha AC,De-Paula-Eduardo C,Gutknecht N,et al.Analysis of the interfacial micromorphology of adhesive systems in cavities prepared with Er, Cr: YSGG, Er: YAG laser and bur.Microsc Res Tech.2007;70(8):745-751.
[16] 张笋,陈涛,葛立宏.扫描电镜下观察铒钇铝石榴石激光备洞后的牙本质形态[J].北京大学学报:医学版,2011,43(5):766-769.
[17] Curti M,Rocca JP,Bertrand MF,et al. Morphostructural aspects of Er: YAG prepared class V cavities.J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2004;22(2):119-123．
[18] 赵晓一,王世明,张成飞.Er:YAG激光切除牙根断面的扫描电镜观察[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2010,28(5):526-528.
[19] 林峰,高萍,郑广宁.激光在牙体牙髓疾病治疗中的研究进展[J].现代口腔医学杂志, 2008,22(4):427-429.
[20] Reyhanian A,Parker S,Moshonov J.The use of the erbium yttrium aluminium garnet(2940 nm)in a laser-assisted apicectomy procedure.Br Dent J.2008;205(6):319-323.
[21] 贾素慧,胡德渝.Er:YAG激光治疗牙体牙髓病的研究进展[J].国外医学:口腔医学分册,2005,32(5):383-385.
[22] Crespi R,Romanos GE,Cassinelli C,et al.Effects of Er:YAG laser and ultrasonic treatment on fibroblast attachment to root.surfaces: an in vitro study.J Periodontol.2006;77(7): 1217-1222.
[23] Schwarz F,Bieling K,Venghaus S,et al.Influence of fluorescencecontrolled Er:YAG laser radiation, the vector system and hand instruments on periodontally diseased root surfaces in vivo.J Clin Periodontol.2006;33(3):200-208.
[24] Stephanovich M.Scanning electron microscopic study of the effects of Er:YAG lasers and conventional methods of preparation on dentin.SDK and NUS. 2005;4(1):153-156 (Bulgarian)
[25] Baraba A,Miletic I,Krmek SJ,et al.Ablative potential of the erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser and conventional handpieces:a comparative study.Photomed Laser Surg.2009;11:465-504.
[26] Krmek SJ,Miletic I,Simeon P,et al.The Temperature Changes in the Pulp Chamber During Cavity Preparation with the Er: YAG Laser Using a Very Short Pulse.Photomed Laser Surg. 2009;27(2):351-355.
[27] Jepsen S,Acil Y,Peschel T,et al.Biochemical andmorphological analysis of dentin following selective caries removal with a fluorescence - controlled Er: YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med.2008;40(5):350-357.
[28] Kornblit R,Trapani D,Bossu M,et al.The use ofErbium:YAG laser for caries removal in paediatric patients following Minimally Invasive Dentistry concepts.Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2008;9(2):81-87.
[29] Louw NP,Pameijer CH,Ackermann WD,et al.Pulp histology after Er:YAG laser cavity preparation in subhuman primates-a pilot study. SADJ.2002;57(8):313-317.
[30] 潘蕾,梅陵宣,陈乔尔. Er∶YAG激光制洞对牙髓的生物学效应[J].安徽医科大学学报,2006,41(4):469-471.
[31] 郑向明,刘筱琳,胡德渝,等.Er:YAG激光在预防性树脂充填中的应用-扫描电镜研究[J].中国激光医学杂志,2003,12(4):224-228.
[32] Eberhard J,Bode K,Hedderich J,et al.Cavity size difference after caries removal by a fluorescence-controlled Er:YAG laser and by conventional bur treatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12(4):311-318.
[33] Ceballos L,Toledano M,Osorio R,et al.Bonding to Er–YAG–laser–treated dentin.J Dent Res.2002;81(2): 119-122.
[34] Magni E,Ferrari M,Hickel R,et al.Effectofozone gas application on the mechanical properties of dental adhesives bonded to dentin.Dent Mater.2008;24(10):1428-1434.
[35] 李子木,仇丽鸿.光固化复合树脂密合度的研究进展[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2008,1(1):43-46.
[36] 贾兴亚,刘婷婷,李心瑶,等.两种牙体预备方法对玻璃离子水门汀与牙本质间粘结力的影响[J].中国医科大学学报,2011,40(3): 234-236.
[37] Ramos AC,Esteves Oliveira M,Arana Chavez VE,et al.Adhesives bonded to erbium:yttrium-alumimum-garnet laserirradiated dentin:transmission electronmicroscopy, scanning electron microscppy and tensile bondstrengthanalyses.Lasers Med Sci.2010;25:181-189.
[38] 舒文,杨向红.Carisolv去腐方法治疗龋齿的临床对比研究[J].口腔医学研究,2005,21(6):670-671.
[39] Katarski G,Kissov K.Contemporary views of Carisolv treatment of dental caries.Clinical cases.SDK and NUS. 2005;4(1):164-172.
[40] 梁保刚,张桂荣,赵奇.Carisolv 伢典化学机械去腐法治疗深龋临床疗效研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2009,2(10):621-622.
[41] 肖杰,储冰峰.乳牙Carisolv去龋的扫描电镜观察[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2008,18(2):84-86.
[42] Banerjee A,Kidd EAM,Walson TF.Scanning electron microscopic observations of human dentine after mechanical caries excavation.J Dent.2008;28:179-186.
[43] Cederlund A,Lindskog S,Blomlof J.Effect of a chemomechanical caries removal system(Carisolv) on dentin topography of non-carious dentin.Acta Odontol Scand.1999; 57:185-189.
[44] Yazici AR,Ozgunaltay G,Dayangac B.A scanning electron microscopic study of different caries removal techniques on human dentin.Oper Dent.2002;27:360-366.
[45] Kinoshita J,Kimura Y,Matsumoto K.Comparative study of carious dentin removal by Er:Cr:YSGG laser and Carisolv.J Clin Laser Med Surg.2003;21:307-315.
[46] 许晓燕,于新波,孙慧斌,等.化学-机械去腐法治疗龋齿随访1年的临床研究[C].2007年第七次全国牙体牙髓病学学术会议论文集, 2007:35-37.
[47] 夏克俭,李姮,王文梅. Carisolv去龋及酸蚀后牙本质表面形态扫描电镜观察[J].口腔医学,2010,30(1):46-48.
[48] 胡林英,宋光泰,钱虹.Carisolv化学机械去龋后牙本质表面的扫描电镜观察[J].武汉大学学报:医学版,2005,26(4):512-514.
[49] 陈舟,江勇. Carisolv化学机械法在龋病治疗中的对比研究[J].口腔医学,2006, 26(6):457-459.
[50] 陈小贤,葛立宏. Carisolv化学机械去腐技术对微拉伸粘拉力的影响[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2006,20(6):612-614.
[51] 于静涛,贾兴亚,乔丽艳,等.铒,铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光切割牙体硬组织效果的扫描电子显微镜观察[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2003, 21(5):356-358.
[52] 韦少锋.微创去腐技术治疗龋齿的临床观察[J].中国临床医学, 2010,17(3):434-435.
[53] 张兴文,王丽珍.微创无痛治疗在龋齿治疗中的临床观察[J].中国民康医学,2009,21(21):2700-2701.
[54] 陈柯,张慧. Er,Cr:YSGG激光治疗口腔疾病的进展[J].中国激光医学杂志,2007,16(1):64-66.
[55] Giza S. Comparative studies of carious defects filling using the classical method and dental drill, and using the Carisolv chemomechanical method and the YAG:Er CTL-1601 laser.Ann Acad Med Stetin.2007;53(3):88-99.
[56] Tachibana A,Marques MM,Soler JM,et al.Erbium, chromium:yttrium scandium gallium garnet laser for caries removal: influence on bonding of a self-etching adhesive system.Lasers Med Sci. 2008;23(4):435-441.
[57] 杨小民.铒激光在口腔医学中的应用[J].实用医学临床杂志,2007, 4(2):33-35.
[58] 韩雯斐,苏俭生.激光消融牙体硬组织的研究进展[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2008,6(4):239-242.