Oscillating field stimulation inhibits neuroinflammatory response and promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury in rats

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.3088

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Oscillating field stimulation (OFS) is an emerging technology that has been used to treat spinal cord injury (SCI) with promising therapeutic effects. The application of electric current to the injured spinal cord is known to promote healing and tissue regeneration. However, the mechanisms by which OFS leads to SCI recovery are not yet fully understood.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether OFS can promote the recovery of neurological function by reducing neuroinflammatory responses after SCI in rats.
METHODS: Sixty-three female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into an experimental group, a SCI group and a sham operation group. Rats in the sham operation group only underwent laminectomy without damaging the spinal cord, and animal models of thoracic (T9-T10) SCI were established in the SCI and experimental groups. The OFS device was implanted into the injured site in the experimental group, followed by continuous electrical stimulation. Basso-Bettie-Bresnahan score was used to evaluate the recovery of motor function after SCI in rats. In addition, hematoxylin-eosin staining was used to test tissue repair and inflammatory cell recruitment. The number of astrocytes and microglia was examined by immunofluorescence staining. The study protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University, with an approval No. LLSC20190736.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The Basso-Bettie-Bresnahan score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the SCI group. Hematoxylin-eosin staining results showed that the number of inflammatory cells in the injured site was considerably reduced in the experimental group compared with the SCI group. The results of immunofluorescence detection showed that the number of glial fibrillary acidic protein positive cells and microglia in the experimental group was dramatically lower than that in the SCI group at different time after surgery. These findings indicate that OFS can improve the motor function of lower limbs, promote tissue repair, reduce inflammatory cell recruitment, and inhibit the activation of astrocytes and microglia after spinal cord injury in rats. OFS can promote the recovery of neurological function by inhibiting inflammatory response after SCI.

Key words: oscillating field, spinal cord, spinal cord injury, inflammation, functional recovery, regeneration, astrocyte

CLC Number:

Fang Chao, Sun Jian, Wei Laifu, Gao Fei, Qian Jun . Oscillating field stimulation inhibits neuroinflammatory response and promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury in rats[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(11): 1717-1722.

Figures/Tables 4

References

[1] Wang L, Shi Q, Dai J, et al. Increased vascularization promotes functional recovery in the transected spinal cord rats by implanted vascular endothelial growth factor-targeting collagen scaffold.J Orthop Res. 2018;36(3):1024-1034.
[2] Cho N, Squair JW, Bloch J, et al. Neurorestorative interventions involving bioelectronic implants after spinal cord injury.Bioelectron Med. 2019;5:10.
[3] Jing JH, Qian J, Zhu N, et al. Improved differentiation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells and neurological function after spinal cord injury in rats by oscillating field stimulation. Neuroscience.2015; 303:346-351.
[4] Bacova M, Bimbova K, Fedorova J, et al. Epidural oscillating field stimulation as an effective therapeutic approach in combination therapy for spinal cord injury.J Neurosci Methods. 2019;311:102-110.
[5] Zhang C, Zhang G, Rong W, et al. Oscillating field stimulation promotes spinal cord remyelination by inducing differentiation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells after spinal cord injury. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(6):3629-3636.
[6] 黄先甲,钱军,张坤坤,等.振荡电场对大鼠损伤脊髓组织中Wnt-3a表达及运动能力的影响[J].中国组织工程研究,2016,20(18): 2648-2654.
[7] Zhang YD, Zhu ZS, Zhang D, et al. Lentivirus-mediated silencing of the PTC1 and PTC2 genes promotes recovery from spinal cord injury by activating the Hedgehog signaling pathway in a rat model. Exp Mol Med. 2017;49(12):e412.
[8] Duan HQ, Wu QL, Yao X, et al. Nafamostat mesilate attenuates inflammation and apoptosis and promotes locomotor recovery after spinal cord injury. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018;24(5):429-438.
[9] Han Q, Xie Y, Ordaz JD, et al. Restoring Cellular Energetics Promotes Axonal Regeneration and Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury.Cell Metab. 2020;31(3):623-641.
[10] Hurlbert RJ, Hadley MN, Walters BC, et al. Pharmacological therapy for acute spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 2015;1:S71-83.
[11] van Den Hauwe L, Sundgren PC, Flanders AE. Spinal Trauma and Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Springer. 2020;2020–2023.DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-38490-6_19
[12] Ramer LM, Ramer MS, Bradbury EJ. Restoring function after spinal cord injury: towards clinical translation of experimental strategies.Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(12):1241-1256.
[13] Wan G, An Y, Tao J, et al. MicroRNA-129-5p alleviates spinal cord injury in mice via suppressing the apoptosis and inflammatory response through HMGB1//TLR4/NF-κB pathway. Biosci Rep. 2020;BSR20193315.
[14] Fitch MT, Silver J. CNS injury, glial scars, and inflammation: Inhibitory extracellular matrices and regeneration failure. Exp Neurol. 2008; 209(2):294-301.
[15] Huynh V, Rosner J, Curt A, et al. Disentangling the Effects of Spinal Cord Injury and Related Neuropathic Pain on Supraspinal Neuroplasticity: A Systematic Review on Neuroimaging. Front Neurol. 2020;10:1413.
[16] Barbeau H, Rossignol S. Recovery of locomotion after chronic spinalization in the adult cat. Brain Res. 1987;412(1):84-95.
[17] Kadoya K, Tsukada S, Lu P, et al. Combined intrinsic and extrinsic neuronal mechanisms facilitate bridging axonal regeneration one year after spinal cord injury. Neuron. 2009;64(2):165-172.
[18] Tran AP, Silver J. Neuroscience. Systemically treating spinal cord injury.Science. 2015;348(6232):285-286.
[19] Fitzharris M, Cripps RA, Lee BB. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(2):117-122.
[20] Wallace MC, Tator CH, Piper I. Recovery of spinal cord function induced by direct current stimulation of the injured rat spinal cord. Neurosurgery. 1987;20(6):878-884.
[21] Borgens RB, Toombs JP, Breur G, et al. An imposed oscillating electrical field improves the recovery of function in neurologically complete paraplegic dogs.J Neurotrauma. 1999;16(7):639-657.
[22] Borgens RB, Liu-Snyder P. Understanding second injury. Q Rev Biol. 2012;87:89-127.
[23] Li X, Liu R, Yu Z, et al. Microglial Hv1 exacerbates secondary damage after spinal cord injury in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020; (20)30272-30272.
[24] Okada S, Hara M, Kobayakawa K, et al. Astrocyte reactivity and astrogliosis after spinal cord injury. Neurosci Res. 2018;126:39-43.
[25] Park KS, Kim JB, Keung M, et al. Chronic hyperglycemia before spinal cord injury increases inflammatory reaction and astrogliosis after injury: human and rat studies. J Neurotrauma. 2020;37(9):1165-1181.
[26] Keilhoff G, Titze M, Rathert H, et al. Normoxic post-ROSC ventilation delays hippocampal CA1 neurodegeneration in a rat cardiac arrest model, but does not prevent it.Exp Brain Res. 2020; s00221-020-05746-6.
[27] Li XH, Fu NS, Xing ZM. MiR-100 suppresses inflammatory activation of microglia and neuronal apoptosis following spinal cord injury via TLR4/NF-κB pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(20): 8713-8720.
[28] Jian YP, Dong SJ, Xu SS, et al. MicroRNA-34a suppresses neuronal apoptosis and alleviates microglia inflammation by negatively targeting the Notch pathway in spinal cord injury.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(3):1420-1427.
[29] Choi JI, Kang HY, Han C, et al. Milk Fat Globule-Epidermal Growth Factor VIII Ameliorates Brain Injury in the Subacute Phase of Cerebral Ischemia in an Animal Model.J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020;63(2): 163-170.