Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2018, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (35): 5735-5740.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.1021

Previous Articles    

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma versus glucocorticoid for lateral humeral epicondylitis: a meta-analysis

Gong Dong1, 2, Liu Jun2, Dong Chenhui2, Deng Yinshuan2, Zhou Yanfeng3, Yang Xinle3, Zhen Ping2   

  1. 1Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China; 2Department of Orthopedics, Lanzhou General Hospital of Lanzhou Military Command, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China; 3Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu Province, China
  • Contact: Zhen Ping, Professor, Chief physician, Department of Orthopedics, Lanzhou General Hospital of Lanzhou Military Command, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
  • About author:Gong Dong, Master candidate, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China; Department of Orthopedics, Lanzhou General Hospital of Lanzhou Military Command, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
  • Supported by:

     the Military Logistics Research Project, No. CWH17J007

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Lateral epicondylitis, a common elbow disease, is often treated with glucocorticoid, but its long-term efficacy is not ideal. Platelet-rich plasma has been used as a new method for the treatment of bone and chronic inflammation, so it is necessary to systematically evaluate and analyze the therapeutic effects of the two methods.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma versus steroid for lateral humeral epicondylitis.
METHODS: Related randomized controlled trials about platelet-rich plasma versus glucocorticoid for epicondylitis were searched in the databases of PubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, CBM and WanFang before May 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed on RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Ten randomized controlled trials involving 661 patients were included. (2) The meta-analysis results showed that, in pain relief, glucocorticoids were superior to platelet-rich plasma at 2-4 weeks (SMD=0.75, P=0.01); there was no significant difference between two groups at 6-8 weeks and 12 weeks (6-8 weeks: SMD=0.38, P=0.25; 12 weeks: SMD=-0.16, P=0.33). Platelet-rich plasma was better than glucocorticoids at 6 months and 1 year (6 months: SMD=-0.95, P < 0.000 01; 1 year: SMD=-0.83, P < 0.000 01). (3) In improving joint function, glucocorticoids were superior to platelet-rich plasma at 2-4 weeks and 6-8 weeks (2-4 weeks: SMD=0.74, P < 0.000 01; 6-8 weeks: SMD=0.46, P=0.000 5); there was no significant difference between two groups at 12 weeks (SMD=-0.24, P=0.22); platelet-rich plasma was better than glucocorticoids at 6 months and 1 year (6 months: SMD=-0.65, P=0.03; 1 year: SMD=-0.53, P=0.001). (4) These results imply that in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis, glucocorticoids can relieve pain (2-4 weeks) and improve joint function (2-8 weeks), platelet-rich plasma appears to be more effective in relieving pain and improving function in the long term (6 months to 1 year). Considering the long-term therapeutic effect of platelet-rich plasma, we recommend platelet-rich plasma as the preferred option for lateral humeral epicondylitis. Due to the limited quality of included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion. 

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:人工关节;骨植入物;脊柱骨折;内固定;数字化骨科;组织工程

Key words: Platelet-Rich Plasma, Glucocorticoids, Humerus, Meta-Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trial, Tissue Engineering

CLC Number: