Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: less bone cement leakage and ideal recovery

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.31.008

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture have obtained good outcomes, because the traditional method is invalid, but there are a variety of choices in operation time, anesthesia, surgical approach and method, and each method has its advantages and disadvantages.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect and preponderance of the manual reduction combined with unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty under general anesthesia in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
METHODS: A total of 53 patients with single vertebral osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, who were treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty, were retrospectively analyzed from July 2012 to December 2014. The new method group (32 cases) received manual reduction, underwent unilateral pedicle puncture and bone
cement injection during unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty under general anesthesia. The conventional method group (21 cases) received conventional percutaneous vertebroplasty.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There was an average of 6-month follow-up (3-14 months). Significant differences in visual analogue scale scores, vertebral compression ratio and kyphosis Cobb’s angle were detected in the new method and the conventional method groups at 3 days post surgery and during final follow-up compared with before surgery (P < 0.01). No significant difference in visual analogue scale scores was found between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the conventional method group, postoperative vertebral compression ratio, kyphosis Cobb’s angle and bone cement leakage rate were significantly lower in the new method group (P < 0.01). Results verified that the new method combined with the advantages of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty, the advantages of unilateral and bilateral puncture approach. The new method can correct kyphosis deformity, effectively recover the vertebral height and physiological curvature and the puncture is safe. Simultaneously, the leakage rate of bone cement is reduced, and the distribution of bone cement is ideal.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：人工关节；骨植入物；脊柱；骨折；内固定；数字化骨科；组织工程

Key words: Tissue Engineering, Spine, Fractures, Bone, Osteoporosis

CLC Number:

R318

Wu Hong, Yuan Yuan, Liu Li-jin, Yan Liang, Xiong Li-wei, Zou Zhi-yuan, Min Zhi-hai. Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: less bone cement leakage and ideal recovery [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2015, 19(31): 4960-4966.

Figures/Tables 7

References

[1] Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Zamora J, et al. Correlation between pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with common low back pain. Spine. 2004;(29):206-210.
[2] 秦子琈,徐有俊.老年骨质疏松症的危险因素研究[J].中国医学创新,2011,8(34):31-33.
[3] 高万旭,宓士军,高景春,等.经皮椎体成形治疗高龄骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折[J].实用骨科杂志,2010,16(4):288-289.
[4] 刘文贵,吕锦瑜,孙建华,等.PVP与保守方法治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2012,22(10): 914-918.
[5] Weisskopf M, Ohnsorge JA, Niethard FU. Intravertebral pressure during vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty:an in vitro study. Spine. 2008;33:178-182.
[6] Chen D, An ZQ, Song S, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared with conservative treatment in patients with chronic painful osteoporotic spinal fractures. J Clin Neurosci. 2014; 21(3):473-477.
[7] Tan HY, Wang LM, Zhao L, et al. A prospective study of percutaneous vertebroplasty for chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Pain Res Manag. 2015;20(1): 8-11.
[8] 朱洲,王生介,厉晓龙,等.聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥椎体成形与保守治疗胸腰椎体新鲜骨质疏松性压缩骨折的比较[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,18(39):6271-6275.
[9] Stevenson M, Gomersall T, Lloyd Jones M, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18(17):1-290.
[10] 李卉,顾一峰,李永东,等.比较经皮椎体成形与保守治疗对慢性疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者疗效的非随机前瞻性试验[J].介入放射学杂志,2012,21(11):921-926.
[11] Ryu KS, Park CK. The prognostic factors influencing on the therapeutic effect of percutaneous verteboplasty in treating osteoportic vertebral compression fractures. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009;45(1):16-23.
[12] Joseph RN, Swift AJ, Maliakal PJ. Single centre prospective study of the efficacy of percutaneous cement augmentation in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. Br J Neurosurg. 2013,27(4):459-464.
[13] 杜曼•吐鲁木汗,祖帕尔•苏来曼,塔扎别克.后凸成形与椎体成形治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的Meta分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,18(13):2089-2095.
[14] 彭小忠,陈明,武振国,等.经皮椎体成形102例中22例骨水泥渗漏原因[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011,15(8):1515-1518.
[15] 周英杰,赵刚,李森,等.经皮聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥椎体成形结合手法牵引复位治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折[J].中国组织工程研究,2012,16(21):3823-3827.
[16] 李涛,朱裕成,郑红兵,等.经皮椎体后凸成形中单双侧经椎弓根穿刺路径的选择[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17(24):1863-1865.
[17] 王珏,刘杨青,原涟靖,等.经皮椎体成形单侧人路穿刺路径方法的选择及疗效[J].实用医学杂志,2013,29(7):1144-1146.
[18] 郝定均,刘摇鹏,贺宝荣,等.陈旧性与新鲜性压缩骨折行椎体成形的临床对比研究[J].脊柱外科杂志,2012,10(2):83-86.
[19] Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK, et al. Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Spine. 2001;26:1631-1638.
[20] Kuklo TR, Polly DW, Owens BD, et al. Measurement of thoracic and lumbar variability. Spine. 2001;26:61-65.
[21] 黄洪斌,范顺武,鲍丰,等.椎体成形结合体位复位治疗创伤性胸腰椎骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,28(1):20-24.
[22] Xiao H, Yang J, Feng X, et al. Comparing complications of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of the randomized and non-randomized controlled studies. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014.
[23] Liliang PC, Su TM, Liang CL, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty improves pain and physical functioning in elderly osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture patients. Gerontology. 2005;51:34-39.
[24] 陈卫,倪才方,王煊,等.经皮椎体成形及后凸成形治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床对比研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2011,45(9): 858-862.
[25] 吴海辉,吴晓,吴晓天,等.经皮椎体后凸成形与经皮椎体成形治疗骨质疏松性胸腰段骨折的疗效对比研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2014,13(9):737-740.
[26] Galin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA. New technologies in spine:kyphoplasty and vertebruplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine. 2001;26: 1511-1515.
[27] Foumey DR. Schomer DF, Nader R. et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(1 Suppl): 21-30.
[28] Movrin I, Vengust R, Komadina R. Adjacent vertebral fractures after percutaneous vertebral augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a comparison of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:1157-1166.
[29] Huang Z, Wan S, Ning L, et al. Is unilateral kyphoplasty as effective and safe as bilateral kyphoplasties for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(9):2833-2842.
[30] 廖旭昱,周雷杰,马维虎,等.经皮椎体后凸成形中单侧经椎弓根穿刺角度与骨水泥分布情况的关系[J].临床骨科杂志,2012,15(3): 241-244.
[31] Kim YY,Rhyu KW.Recompression of vertebral body after balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotlc vertebral compression fracture. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(11):1907-1912.
[32] Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Muijs SP, van EAR, et al. A clinical comparative study on low versus medium viscosity polymethylmetacrylate bone cement in percutaneous vertebroplasty: viscosity associated with cement leakage. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(20):E1037-E1044.
[33] Gravius S, Kraska N, Maus U, et al. Intravertebral pressure during vertebroplasty - an in-vitro study. Z Orthop Unfall. 2009;147(1):43-47.
[34] Jin YJ, Yoon SH, Park KW, et al. The volumetric analysis of cement in vertebroplasty: relationship with clinical outcome and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(12):E761- E772.
[35] Molly S, Mathis JM, Belkoff SM. The effect of vertebral body percentage fill in mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebro plasty. Spine. 2003;28:1549-1554.
[36] Komemushi A, Tanigawa N, Kariya S, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for compression fracture: analysis of vertebral body volume by CT volumetry. Acta Radiol. 2005;46(3):276- 279.