Relationship between intraoperative neurophysiological
monitoring alert and postoperative walking ability

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2483

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is popular in spinal surgery. However, a severe iatrogenic spinal cord injury cannot be completely eliminated. Is there a relationship between true positive intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alert during particular surgical steps and postoperative neurological recovery? This topic is to improve the safety of spinal invasive procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between true positive intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alert during particular surgical steps and postoperative walking ability.

METHODS: A retrospective study of 2 249 patients undergoing intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong was conducted. Standard patient demographics, diagnosis and operative features and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring data were collected. There were 10 cases of true positive intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alert (4 males, 6 females, 14-88 years old), and the average follow-up time was 9.8 years. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether surgical steps triggering intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alert impact the spinal cord or not. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical requirements of Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong, and the patients and their guardians signed the informed consents.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: These alerts occurred during decompression (n=3), anterior disc release (n=1), finding the entering point of T₃ pedicle (n=1), screw insertion (n=1), reduction of fracture (n=2), insertion of wire (n=1), and cement injection (n=1). Among these patients, 100% of spinal cord invasive procedure patients developed incompetence of walking, while 80% (4/5) of spine cord non-invasive patients were capable of walking (P < 0.05). After the alert was triggered, four patients continued with primary program, three patients underwent expanding decompression and three patients gave up surgery. If true positive intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alert is reported during spinal invasive procedures, there should be a very high chance of postoperative walking disability. If any conditions occur, the surgery needs to be stopped, and instead, remedial measures such as surgery suspension, steroids injection, and additional decompression should be performed immediately.

Key words: spine, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, true positive, walking ability, operation, Iatrogenic, spinal cord injury

CLC Number:

Zhong Yi, Huang Yihua, Guan Rikang, Hu Yong, Huang Yangliang. Relationship between intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alert and postoperative walking ability[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2020, 24(11): 1666-1670.

Figures/Tables 2

References

[1] GUNNARSSON T, KRASSIOUKOV AV, SARJEANT R, et al. Real-time continuous intraoperative electromyographic and somatosensory evoked potential recordings in spinal surgery: correlation of clinical and electrophysiologic findings in a prospective, consecutive series of 213 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2004;29:677-684.
[2] NUWER MR, EMERSON RG, GALLOWAY G, et al.American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Evidence based guideline update: intraoperative spinal monitoring with somatosensory and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials.J Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;29:101-108.
[3] AJIBOYE RM, D’ORO A, ASHANA AO, et al.Routine use of intraoperative neuromonitoring during ACDFs for the treatment of spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy is questionable: a review of 15,395 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2017; 42:14-19.
[4] NEY JP, VAN DER GOES DN, NUWER MR.Does intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring matter in noncomplex spine surgeries? Neurology.2015;85:2151-2158.
[5] HAMILTON DK, SMITH JS, SANSUR CA, et al.Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee.Spine.2011; 36:1218-1228.
[6] Matsumoto M, Toyama Y, Chikuda H, et al.Outcomes of fusion surgery for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the thoracic spine: a multicenter retrospective survey.J Neurosurg Spine.2011;15:380-385
[7] MACDONALD DB, SKINNER S, SHILS J, et al.American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring - a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol.2013; 124:2291-2316 .
[8] IMAGAMA S, ANDO K, ITO Z, et al.Risk factors for ineffectiveness of posterior decompression and dekyphotic corrective fusion with instrumentation for beaktype thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a single institute study. Neurosurgery.2017; 80:800-808.
[9] STECKER M.A review of intraoperative monitoring for spinal surgery.Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:174.
[10] PARK P, WANG AC, SANGALA JR, et al.Impact of multimodal intraoperative monitoring during correction of symptomatic cervical or cervicothoracic kyphosis.J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14: 99-105.
[11] RAYNOR BL, BRIGHT JD, LENKE LG, et al. Significant change or loss of intraoperative monitoring data: A 25-year experience in 12,375 spinal surgeries.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2013;38:113-117.
[12] Nuwer MR.Intraoperative monitoring of the spinal cord. Clin Neurophysiol.2008;119:247-249.
[13] PELOSI L, LAMB J, GREVITT M, et al.Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery.Clin Neurophysiol.2002;113:1082-1091.
[14] YOSHIDA G, ANDO M, IMAGAMA S,et al.Alert Timing and Corresponding Intervention with Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring for High Risk Spinal Surgery.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44(8):E470-E479.
[15] VITALE MG, SKAGGS DL, PACE GI, et al. Best practices in intraoperative neuromonitoring in spine deformity surgery: Development of an intraoperative checklist to optimize response. Spine Deform. 2014;2:333-339.
[16] TANG CYK, CHEUNG JPY, SAMARTZIS D, et al.Predictive factors for neurological deterioration after surgical decompression for thoracic ossified yellow ligament.Eur Spine J. 2017;26: 2598-2605.
[17] DANIEL JW, BOTELHO RV, MILANO JB,et al.Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Spine.2018;43:1154-1160.