Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2012, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (16): 3033-3036.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2012.16.041

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Different bone grafts for repair of periodontal alveolar bone defects

Ding Jian-yong1, Wei Lin2, Guo Jia-ping3   

  1. 1Department of Stomatology, Guanggu Branch of the Third Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan  430074, Hubei Province, China; 2Health Service Center for Community of Hanzhong Street, Wuhan  430032, Hubei Province, China; 3Department of Stomatology, Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Region, Wuhan  430079, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2011-10-29 Revised:2011-12-05 Online:2012-04-15 Published:2012-04-15
  • Contact: Guo Jia-ping, Master, Chief physician, Department of Stomatology, Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Region, Wuhan 430079, Hubei Province, China
  • About author:Ding Jian-yong, Attending physician, Department of Stomatology, Guanggu Branch of the Third Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan 430074, Hubei Province, China jyding72@sina.cn

PDF

912

Cited

3

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Bone graft material is the most important factor that affects the efficiency of bone grafting.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the inductive activities and clinical effects of different bone grafts for treatment of periodontal alveolar bone defects.
METHODS: A total of 24 patients with periodontal alveolar bone defect were repaired for retrospective analysis of individual and treatment information. All patients were followed-up for 6 months. Comparison of the clinical effects of autogenous bone, Bio-oss bone powder and their combination was performed. X-ray examination was performed to observe the amount and morphology of new bone in all patients.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Only one case of Bio-oss bone powder was ineffective, and the ineffective rate was 4%. Tooth mobility of patients was decreased after treatment than before, the tooth mobility was no loose-loose at degree Ⅱ (P < 0.05). X-ray showed that bone filling height of the combined material group was obviously higher than that in the other two groups (P < 0.05). It is indicated that autogenous bone and Bio-oss bone powder combined application can make up their own disadvantages to achieve an additive effect during implantation.
 

CLC Number: