BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fracture is the third major fracture type after hip fracture and distal radius fracture in the elderly. The treatment of proximal humeral fractures is diverse. The latest research in recent years has found that the third-generation multi-dimensional locking humeral intramedullary nail system has shown good clinical results in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures, but the current optimal treatment for proximal humeral fractures remains controversial.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of Multiloc intramedullary nail versus PHILOS locking plate in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.
METHODS: The electronic databases of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library, which last updated in February, 2019, were searched for clinical controlled trials regarding Multiloc intramedullary nail versus PHILOS locking plate in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture. The methodological quality of each publication was critically appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale appraisal tool and a meta-analysis was performed with the Cochrane Collaboration's Rev Man 5.3 software.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Eight studies including 267 patients were analyzed. (2) The results of meta-analysis revealed that Multiloc intramedullary nail group had significantly better outcomes in Constant score (MD=1.98(0.65, 3.31), P=0.004), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score [MD=3.59(1.61, 5.57), P=0.000 4], external rotation (MD=4.55(2.19, 6.91), P=0.000 2), operation time [MD=-13.11(-25.47, -0.74), P=0.04), healing time [SMD=-0.46(-0.47, -0.18), P=0.001), and blood loss [MD=-66.44(-102.25, -36.62), P < 0.000 1) than the PHILOS plate group. (3) However, there were no significant differences in Visual Analogue Scale scores, anterior flexion and uplifting flexion, and adverse reactions between the Multiloc intramedullary nail and PHILOS plate groups (P > 0.05). (4) Results of meta-analysis showed that compared with PHILOS locking plate, Multiloc intramedullary nail had the advantages of shorter operation time, less bleeding, quicker recovery of shoulder function, and faster healing time, but the incidence of postoperative acromion impingement, screw cut, humeral head necrosis and varus deformity was similar between these two groups. Relatively speaking, Multiloc intramedullary nails have a better clinical outcome than PHILOS locking plate.