Method and verification of three-dimensional finite element modeling for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy

doi:10.12307/2025.954

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Currently, finite element model studies involving cervical spondylotic radiculopathy either directly use normal human imaging data to construct the model, or use imaging data of a patient with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy to construct the model, which lacks simulation and representativeness.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the simulation performance of the three-dimensional finite element model of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, so as to provide references for the later research on cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and even spinal degenerative diseases.
METHODS: First, CT was used to scan the cervical spine of a normal person. Through multiple software, geometric reconstruction, reverse engineering, meshing, material assignment and other processes were carried out to construct a complete three-dimensional finite element model of the cervical spine including vertebrae (C0-T1), intervertebral discs (C2-C7), ligaments, articular cartilages, muscles and other structures, and verify the model. Then, a model was created for intervertebral disc degeneration to simulate the occurrence and development process of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Finally, verification was carried out by measuring the height of the intervertebral space, the size of the transverse and longitudinal diameters of the intervertebral foramen and their change amplitudes under different loading conditions.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) After the successful construction of the three-dimensional finite element model of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, except that the transverse diameter of the intervertebral foramen did not change, the height of the intervertebral space and the longitudinal diameter of the intervertebral foramen gradually decreased from moderate to severe intervertebral disc degeneration. (2) The dynamic verification results showed that after applying different loading conditions, in the three-dimensional finite element models of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy with moderate and severe intervertebral disc degeneration, the change amplitudes of the height of the intervertebral space and the transverse and longitudinal diameters of the intervertebral foramen decreased, indicating that the volume of the intervertebral foramen and the ability to accommodate nerve roots decreased. (3) Therefore, the finite element model of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy constructed in this study conforms to the pathogenesis characteristics of this disease.

Key words: cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, three-dimensional finite element model, degenerative spinal disease, modeling, model validation, simulation

CLC Number:

Liang Long, Liu Guangwei, Yu Jie, Wei Xu, Li Jing, Lu Guangqi, Zhu Liguo, Yin Xunlu, Feng Minshan. Method and verification of three-dimensional finite element modeling for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2026, 30(15): 3871-3877.

Figures/Tables 1

References

[1] LIN Y, ZHONG S, HUANG C, et al. The efficacy of acupuncture therapies in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A network meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2024;10(11):e31793.
[2] JAJEH H, LEE A, CHARLS R, et al. A clinical review of hand manifestations of cervical myelopathy, cervical radiculopathy, radial, ulnar, and median nerve neuropathies. J Spine Surg. 2024;10(1):120-134.
[3] ALMASI A, JAFARI S, SOLOUKI L, et al. The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Adv Biomed Res. 2023;12:191.
[4] THOOMES E, THOOMES-DE GRAAF M, CLELAND J, et al. Timing of evidence-based non-surgical interventions as part of multimodal treatment guidelines for the management of cervical radiculopathy: a Delphi study protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11(3):e043021.
[5] KJAER P, KONGSTED A, HARTVIGSEN J, et al. National clinical guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset neck pain or cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(9):2242-2257.
[6] 崔学军,姚敏.颈椎病中西医结合诊疗专家共识[J].世界中医药,2023, 18(7):918-922.
[7] de BEST RF, COPPIETERS MW, van TRIJFFEL E, et al. Risk assessment of vascular complications following manual therapy and exercise for the cervical region: diagnostic accuracy of the International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists framework (The Go4Safe project). J Physiother. 2023;69(4):260-266.
[8] 林苏琼,俞乐,张峰,等.颈椎旋转手法对脑动脉粥样硬化患者血流动力学及粥样斑块的影响[J].中国实用医药,2011,6(32):12-14.
[9] SRIREKHA A, BASHETTY K. Infinite to finite: an overview of finite element analysis. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21(3):425-432.
[10] MAAS SA, ATESHIAN GA, WEISS JA. FEBio: History and Advances. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017;19:279-299.
[11] BREKELMANS WA, POORT HW, SLOOFF TJ. A new method to analyse the mechanical behaviour of skeletal parts. Acta Orthop Scand. 1972;43(5):301-317.
[12] 姜雪佳,赵虹飞,张文霞,等.基于三维有限元技术解析颈椎斜扳手法作用机制[J].山东中医杂志,2024,43(11):1249-1254.
[13] JAUMARD NV, BAUMAN JA, WEISSHAAR CL, et al. Contact pressure in the facet joint during sagittal bending of the cadaveric cervical spine. J Biomech Eng. 2011;133(7):71004.
[14] YOGANANDAN N, KNOWLES SA, MAIMAN DJ, et al. Anatomic study of the morphology of human cervical facet joint. Spine. 2003;28(20):2317-2323.
[15] YOGANANDAN N, KUMARESAN S, PINTAR FA. Geometric and mechanical properties of human cervical spine ligaments. J Biomech Eng. 2000; 122(6):623-629.
[16] NARAYAN Y, SRIRANGAM K, FRANK AP. Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 2. Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modeling. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2001;16(1):1-27.
[17] TEO E, ZHANG Q, TAN K, et al. Effect of muscles activation on head-neck complex under simulated ejection. J Musculoskelet Res. 2004;8(4):155-165.
[18] HEDENSTIERNA S, HALLDIN P, SIEGMUND GP. Neck muscle load distribution in lateral, frontal, and rear-end impacts: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Spine. 2009;34(24):2626-2633.
[19] PANJABI MM, CRISCO JJ, VASAVADA A, et al. Mechanical Properties of the Human Cervical Spine as Shown by Three-Dimensional Load-Displacement Curves. Spine. 2001;26(24):2692-2700.
[20] FINN MA, BRODKE DS, DAUBS M, et al. Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after singlelevel fusion or cervical arthroplasty. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(10):1520-1527.
[21] BROLIN K, HALLDIN P. Development of a finite element model of the upper cervical spine and a parameter study of ligament characteristics. Spine. 2004;29(4):376-385.
[22] YUAN W, ZHANG H, ZHOU X, et al. The Influence of Artificial Cervical Disc Prosthesis Height on the Cervical Biomechanics: A Finite Element Study. World Neurosurg. 2018;113:E490-E498.
[23] 黄学成,叶林强,江晓兵,等.旋转手法中侧屈方向对颈椎间盘位移、内在应力的影响及意义[J].山东医药,2018,58(16):5-8.
[24] WOODS BI, HILIBRAND AS. Cervical radiculopathy: epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(5):E251-E259.
[25] KUMARESAN S, YOGANANDAN N, PINTAR FA, et al. Contribution of disc degeneration to osteophyte formation in the cervical spine: a biomechanical investigation. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(5):977-984.
[26] KIM HJ, NEMANI VM, PIYASKULKAEW C, et al. Cervical Radiculopathy: Incidence and Treatment of 1,420 Consecutive Cases. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(2):231-237.
[27] 廖少君,詹吉恒,侯宇,等.神经根型颈椎病临床实践指南和专家共识方法学与报告质量评价[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2024,44(10):1197-1205.
[28] 王常煜,李汪,张逸雯,等.2022-2023年中医病因病机学说研究进展[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2024,30(7):1135-1140.
[29] 赵宇昕,亮亮,金凤,等.青少年颈椎间盘突出症有限元模型建立及应力分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2025,29(3):448-454.
[30] 王晓伟,王晓丹,梁元政,等.颈椎病有限元分析的研究进展[J].中医正骨, 2023,35(8):61-63.
[31] 叶林强,陈超,刘源辉,等.体位对颈椎旋转手法整复神经根型颈椎病关节突关节骨错缝的有限元分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2023,27(29): 4607-4611.
[32] 曹盛楠,王丹丹,王从安,等.三维平衡正脊手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的有限元分析[J].中国骨伤,2020,33(9):867-872.
[33] WONG JJ, CÔTÉ P, QUESNELE JJ, et al. The course and prognostic factors of symptomatic cervical disc herniation with radiculopathy: a systematic review of the literature. Spine J. 2014;14(8):1781-1789.
[34] 谢栋,王珑清,陈清,等.伴C5/C6椎间孔狭窄神经根型颈椎病影像学特点及临床意义[J].海军军医大学学报,2023,44(12):1451-1458.
[35] 吴婷,蔡阁,尹帅子,等.持续静力牵引下正骨治疗神经根型颈椎病临床疗效观察[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2023,33(6):532-534.
[36] PFIRRMANN CW, METZDORF A, ZANETTIA M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine. 2001;26(17): 1873-1878.
[37] 张刚,陈健,常俊,等.影像学定量评估腰椎间盘退变的研究进展[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2024,34(7):769-773.
[38] ZHANG Y, PAN Y, MAO X, et al. Finite element model reveals the involvement of cartilage endplate in quasi-static biomechanics of intervertebral disc degeneration. Heliyon. 2024;10(18):e37524.
[39] KREINER DS, MATZ P, BONO CM, et al. Guideline summary review:an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Spine J. 2020;20(7):998-1024.