Comparison of traditional metal pulling nail and macromolecule absorbable screw fixation in repair of unstable ankle fractures

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.48.016

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Clinical treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis separation of unstable ankle fractures can be treated by surgical internal fixation method. The internal fixation process can choose different materials, in the past, most of the operations used metal pulling nail, but there may be broken nails and other risks.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the application effect of traditional metal pulling nail and macromolecule absorbable screw fixation in tibiofibular syndesmosis separation of unstable ankle fracture.
METHODS: The clinical data of 63 patients with tibiofibular syndesmosis separation of unstable ankle fractures who received surgical internal fixation treatment in Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine from February 2013 to February 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into metal pulling nail group (n=32) and absorbable screw group (n=31) according to the use of different materials. The fracture end was reset by cutting from the outside of the lower section of the fibula. The steel plate was used for fixation. The traditional metal pull screws and macromolecule absorbable screw were used for fixation. During the 12 months
of follow-up after internal fixation, the ankle function scores of two groups (Baird-Jackson), clinical effect and the incidence of adverse events were observed and compared.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The average ambulation time and hospital stay of patients after internal fixation in absorbable screw group were significantly less than those of metal pulling nail group (P < 0.05). The ankle joint function scores (Baird-Jackson) in these two groups were increased compared with those before surgery, but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). The excellent and good rate of patients in absorbable screw group was significantly higher than that in the metal pulling nail group (P < 0.05). During 12 months of follow-up after internal fixation, one patient had screw breakage in metal pulling nail group. There was no wound infection among patients in these two groups. These results confirm that the use of macromolecule absorbable screw fixation for the treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis separation of unstable ankle fractures can obtain better application effect compared with the traditional metal pulling nails.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：人工关节；骨植入物；脊柱；骨折；内固定；数字化骨科；组织工程

CLC Number:

R318

Yang Ning, Dou Qun-li, Yang Jin. Comparison of traditional metal pulling nail and macromolecule absorbable screw fixation in repair of unstable ankle fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2015, 19(48): 7801-7805.

Figures/Tables 5

References

[1] 周宁峰,王金武,张亚东,等.可吸收内固定材料在不稳定性踝关节骨折中的应用和评价[J].临床外科杂志,2012,20(9): 659-660.

[2] 闫飞,张湘生,梁家龙,等.可吸收螺钉治疗踝关节骨折[J].中国骨伤,2006,19(6):325-327.

[3] 项江骊,欧忠明,黎友富,等.可吸收螺钉治疗踝关节骨折23例[J].黔南民族医专学报,2010,23(3):178-179.

[4] 宋昭仁,图新.解剖钢板可吸收螺钉治疗踝关节骨折分析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2014,(26):99-99.

[5] 刘建华,余世明,徐栋梁,等.切开复位内固定治疗踝关节骨折的临床研究[J].中国基层医药,2013,20(17):2584-2586.

[6] 周荣华.可吸收螺钉治疗踝关节骨折23例疗效分析[J].海南医学院学报,2011,17(7):954-956.

[7] 刘立峰,蔡锦方,梁进,等.可吸收螺钉固定治疗移位的距骨颈骨折[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2003,17(5):367-369.

[8] 王占军,吴洪增.可吸收拉力螺钉配合钉板固定治疗三踝骨折[J].医学信息,2012,25(7):297-298.

[9] 杨文华,曹怀明.生物降解螺钉和空心金属螺钉治疗踝部骨折的疗效对比研究[J].中国社区医师(医学专业), 2012,14(19): 177-178.

[10] 刘鑫,王云飞,张雨,等.可吸收拉力螺钉配合金属内固定治疗三踝骨折[J].包头医学,2008,32(2):80-81.

[11] 钟涛.踝关节骨折内固定疗效临床分析[J].中外健康文摘, 2011, 8(9):28-30.

[12] 徐海林,王天兵,陈建海,等.可吸收螺钉在踝关节骨折中的应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2012,14(2):113-116.

[13] 丁宏.可吸收螺钉在踝关节骨折中的效果观察[J].中国医药导刊, 2013,(8):1321-1322.

[14] 李进,杨述华,杜靖远,等.PDLLA可吸收螺钉治疗踝关节骨折的临床研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2003,5(4):332-334.

[15] 邢涛,董林,魏国俊,等.可吸收螺钉内固定术联合中药熏洗治疗单纯内踝骨折疗效观察[J].中国中医药信息杂志, 2011,18(12): 67-68.

[16] 张世权,刘安庆,肖德明,等.可吸收螺钉治疗踝关节骨折并发症分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(11):921-922.

[17] 曾心一.可吸收螺钉治疗三踝骨折的临床应用[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2008,7(5):48-49.

[18] 刘望明,王磊.可吸收螺钉在踝关节骨折中的应用[J].临床骨科杂志,2006,9(5):388-389.

[19] 王愉思,李欣,阎戈,等.可吸收螺钉联合克氏针固定治疗部分踝关节骨折的疗效评价[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2009,11(3):213-216.

[20] Yasui Y, Takao M, Miyamoto W, et al. Anatomical reconstruction of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament for chronic disruption of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(4):691-695.

[21] 罗振东,王世东,葛新,等.可吸收螺钉治疗单纯下胫腓联合分离[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(3):288-289.

[22] 李京生,李绍光,孙天胜,等.经内外踝截骨入路可吸收螺钉固定治疗复杂距骨体部骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(10): 748-750.

[23] 陈伯平,高圆.可吸收螺钉治疗踝关节骨折58例体会[J].中国社区医师(医学专业),2012,14(13):116-117.

[24] 扈延龄,袁万青,王兰凤,等.PDLLA可吸收螺钉和金属螺钉治疗下胫腓联合分离的前瞻性对照研究[J].南方医科大学学报,2010, 30(10):2360-2362.

[25] 王彬,钟丹,周祖华,等.可吸收螺钉治疗踝关节骨折的疗效分析[J].求医问药(学术版),2012,10(3):477-478.

[26] 刘涛.可吸收螺钉治疗踝关节骨折[J].内蒙古医学杂志, 2011, 43(9):1098-1099.

[27] 闫家祥,董秀青.超关节外固定支架并可吸收螺钉治疗Pilon骨折体会[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2006,15(14):1938-1939.

[28] 许英杰,刘迎春,孙华,等.可吸收螺钉治疗踝关节骨折58例疗效分析[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2009,18(18):2137-2137.

[29] 陈晓荣,董喆.可吸收螺钉内固定治疗踝关节骨折128例临床分析[J].局解手术学杂志,2010,19(4):314.

[30] 郭文豪,梁惠钦.可吸收螺丝钉内固定治疗三踝骨折伴踝关节脱位27例报告[J].中国医师杂志,2002,4(3):251-252.

[31] 潘俊晖,刘丽琼.可吸收螺钉及固定棒在踝关节骨折中的应用(附17例临床分析)[J].福建医药杂志,2003,25(2):33-34.

[32] 时爱东,付强,张建伟,等.可吸收螺钉及固定棒临床应用的初步报告[J].健康必读(中旬刊),2012,11(5):235-236.

[33] 余海滨.可吸收螺钉治疗踝关节骨折37例报告[J].中国实用医药, 2008,3(23):101-102.

[34] 王盛强,程毅.可吸收螺钉在踝关节骨折中的应用22例分析[J].中国误诊学杂志,2009,9(3):688-689.

[35] 王学磊,康志秋,王其乐,等.可吸收螺钉治疗单纯内踝骨折42例疗效观察[J].组织工程与重建外科杂志,2008,4(6):344-345.

[36] 赵松林,王全成.可吸收螺钉治疗踝关节骨折的临床应用32例[J].中国现代药物应用,2010,4(12):45-46.

[37] 缪荣明.管型钢板结合可吸收螺钉内固定治疗三踝骨折效果观察[J].临床误诊误治,2010,23(8):719-720.

[38] 崔彦江,付立新,张书钦,等.手术与手法保守治疗踝关节骨折的临床对比研究[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2013,22(25):2764-2765.

[39] 邓磊,马占忠,孙建峰,等.可吸收螺钉内固定治疗下胫腓联合不稳定型踝关节骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2009,24(3):282- 283.

[40] 曾卡斌,吴建斌,高招文,等.可吸收螺钉在踝关节骨折合并下胫腓分离中的临床应用[J].临床骨科杂志,2012,15(6):668-669.