Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2011, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (52): 9803-9807.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.52.026

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper-limb function of acute stroke patients

Liu Zhen1, Zhang Pan-de1, Liu Cui-hua1, Rong Xiao-chuan1, Deng Hong-yan1, Zhang Jin-xin2   

  1. 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, First People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, Guangdong Province, China
    2School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou  510000, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2011-10-13 Revised:2011-11-11 Online:2011-12-24 Published:2011-12-24
  • About author:Liu Zhen★, Master, Attending physician, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, First People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, Guangdong Province, China lzym3798@163.com

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Recently studies showed that robot-assisted therapy can improve recovery of upper-limb in subacute and chronic stroke patients, but the studies on robot-assisted therapy in acute stroke patients are few.
OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper-limb in acute stroke patients.
METHODS: A total of 30 acute stroke patients were divided into two groups according to the wish. The patients in conventional therapy group received a conventional rehabilitative program including usual facilitation techniques, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, acupuncture therapy and so on. The patients in robot-assisted therapy group received robot-assisted therapy on the basis of conventional rehabilitative program. This kind of robot consists of adaptive upper-limb weight support, intelligence feedback and three-dimension training systems. A single or multiple joint training can be carried out in the virtual reality environment.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: ①After treatment Fugl-Meyer Score of the upper extremity assessment (FMA) and the functional independence measure (FIM) were better than the scores before treatment both in the two groups significantly. ②At 3 weeks after treatment, there was no statistical difference in the FMA Scores in the two groups (P=0.075), but at 3 months the patients in robot-assisted therapy group gained better scores than conventional therapy group significantly (P < 0.01). ③The differences were not significant in the FIM Scores between the two groups both at 3 weeks or 3 months after treatment (P > 0.05). ④The changes of scores both on FMA and FIM compared with before treatment in robot-assisted therapy group were better than conventional therapy group statistically (P < 0.05). It could be concluded that robot-assisted therapy gained better motor function of upper limb in acute stroke patients on the basis of conventional therapy. Robot-assisted therapy also could change much more motor function and activities of daily living.

CLC Number: