Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2020, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (18): 2945-2952.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2634

Previous Articles    

Network meta-analysis on effectiveness of fire needle, warm acupuncture, and electroacupuncture in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

Zhang Jinhuan1, Chen Yirong1, Lan Kai1, Hu Liyu1, Yu Haibo2   

  1. 1the Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518033, Guangdong Province, China; 2Department of Acupuncture, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen 518033, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2019-11-15 Revised:2019-11-15 Accepted:2019-12-19 Online:2020-06-28 Published:2020-04-07
  • Contact: Yu Haibo, Chief physician, Doctoral supervisor, Department of Acupuncture, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen 518033, Guangdong Province, China
  • About author:Zhang Jinhuan, Doctoral candidate, the Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518033, Guangdong Province, China
  • Supported by:
     the “Three Projects” Liu Baoyan, Chief Researcher of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Innovative Clinical Evaluation Method of Chinese Acupuncture, No. SZSM201612001

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Acupuncture has different forms as a kind of therapy, mainly warm acupuncture, fire needle and electroacupuncture, but the balance of effectiveness and safety between these measures remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of warm acupuncture, fire needle and electroacupuncture in the intervention of knee osteoarthritis by network meta-analysis.

METHODS: The Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBMdisc databases were searched for the clinical randomized controlled trials of warm acupuncture, fire needle and electroacupuncture in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis published before September 20, 2019. RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0 were used for data analysis.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 2 871 patients with knee osteoarthritis were included in 34 randomized controlled trials. The results of meta-analysis showed that (1) the total clinical effective rate in the fire needle group (OR=1.08, 95%CI: 1.00-1.17, P < 0.05) and warm acupuncture group (OR=1.08, 95%CI: 1.02-1.14, P < 0.05) was better than that in the electroacupuncture, and the total effective rate of the three acupuncture treatments was better than that of western medicine, especially fire needle. (2) In the aspect of improving the Visual Analogue Scale scores, the fire needle (MD=-2.12, 95%CI: -3.52 to -0.71, P < 0.05), warm acupuncture (MD=-1.31, 95%CI: -2.33 to -0.29, P < 0.05), and electroacupuncture (MD=-1.17, 95%CI: -2.19 to -0.16), P < 0.05) were superior to western medicine, especially fire needle. (3) In terms of reducing WOMAC scores, fire needle (MD=-15.38, 95%CI: -27.88 to -2.87, P < 0.05), warm acupuncture (MD=-11.48, 95%CI: -16.45 to -6.51, P < 0.05), and electroacupuncture (MD=-7.29, 95%CI: -11.86 to -2.72, P < 0.05) were superior to western medicine, especially fire needle. (4) In summary, comprehensive comparison of three kinds of acupuncture, in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, fire needle is the first choice. However, it still needs to be confirmed by more high-quality randomized controlled trials. 

Key words:

network meta-analysis, knee osteoarthritis, acupuncture, fire needle, electroacupuncture, tissue engineering

CLC Number: