Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2015, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (53): 8543-8548.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.53.003

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: comparison of five years of prosthesis survival rate

Liang Ning1, Samuel Yih Shyan Wong2, Nick Clement2, Deborah MacDonald2, Daniel E Porter1   

  1. 1Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China; 2Department of Orthopedics, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK
  • Received:2015-10-19 Online:2015-12-24 Published:2015-12-24
  • Contact: Daniel E Porter, Chief physician, M.D., Doctoral supervisor, Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China
  • About author:Liang Ning, Master, Attending physician, Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental arthroplasty are more and more applied in the treatment of isolated medial compartment of knee joint osteoarthritis.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the repair efficacy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in the treatment of knee medial compartment osteoarthritis.
METHODS: Totally 109 patients with isolated medial compartment of knee joint osteoarthritis were enrolled, and then divided into unicompartmental arthroplasty group (n=41) and total knee arthroplasty group (n=68) according to the different repair methods. The average hospital stay, the incidence of complications after replacement, total scores of physical health and mental health, the Oxford knee joint scores and prosthesis survival rate after 5 years of replacement were compared.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The average hospital stay of patients in the unicompartmental arthroplasty group ((4.21±2.44) days) was shorter than that in the total knee arthroplasty group ((6.11±2.23) days) (P=0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications, total scores of physical health and mental health, the Oxford knee joint scores and other aspects between these two groups (P > 0.05). After 5 years of replacement, the prosthesis survival rate of unicompartmental arthroplasty group (90%) was lower than that in the total knee arthroplasty group (100%) (P < 0.05). These results suggest that as for patients with isolated medial compartment of knee joint osteoarthritis, unicompartmental arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty have similar repair effect; however, the prosthesis survival rate is a little lower after 5 years of unicompartmental arthroplasty. 

CLC Number: