Imaging evaluation strategy of spinal interbody fusion

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.48.020

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Interbody fusion is widely used in spine surgeries. Failed fusion may cause many complications, so it is very important to evaluate fusion before surgery. Imaging methods are commonly used to evaluate fusion, including X ray, CT and MRI. Above methods have their own specific methods and characteristics, which cause their differences in sensibility and specificity.
OBJECTIVE: To review the research progress of imaging methods in interbody fusion.
METHODS: The English key words were “lambar fusion, cervical fusion, interbody fusion, evaluation method” in the PubMed database. The literatures with detailed description of interbody fusion were selected for further review, including comparative study on a variety of evaluation methods of imaging means.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: According to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, a total of 40 papers were included. X-ray and CT are the most commonly used methods, while CT is more reliable. MRI, bone scan and other methods cannot correctly and directly evaluate spinal fusion. Overall judgment of symptoms, signs and different kinds of image data are more reasonable fusion evaluation strategies.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：人工关节；骨植入物；脊柱；骨折；内固定；数字化骨科；组织工程

CLC Number:

R318

Gao Zhi-qiang, Li Yang, Luo Fei . Imaging evaluation strategy of spinal interbody fusion[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2015, 19(48): 7825-7830.

Figures/Tables 3

References

[1] Fh A. Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for Pott's desease. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1911;57: 885-886.

[2] Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, et al. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(24): 2807-2812.

[3] Carreon LY, Djurasovic M, Glassman SD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of fine-cut CT scans with reconstructions to determine the status of an instrumented posterolateral fusion with surgical exploration as reference standard. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(8): 892-895.

[4] Brantigan JW, Steffee AD. A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(14): 2106-2107.

[5] Min SH, Yoo JS. The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(5): 1164-1172.

[6] Fogel GR, Toohey JS, Neidre A, et al. Fusion assessment of posterior lumbar interbody fusion using radiolucent cages: X-ray films and helical computed tomography scans compared with surgical exploration of fusion. Spine J. 2008; 8(4): 570-577.

[7] Santos ER, Goss DG, Morcom RK et al. Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(10): 997-1001.

[8] McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Geis WP, et al. Minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine. Emphasis on the lateral BAK. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(13): 1476-1484.

[9] Christensen FB, Laursen M, Gelineck J, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of radiograph interpretation with and without pedicle screw implants: the need for a detailed classification system in posterolateral spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(5): 538-543; discussion 543-534.

[10] Shah RR, Mohammed S, Saifuddin A, et al. Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation. Eur Spine J. 2003;12(4): 378-385.

[11] Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR. Pseudarthrosis in the lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1948. 30: 302-312.

[12] Simmons JW. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior elements as chip grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;(193): 85-89.

[13] McAlister WH, Shackelford GD. Measurement of spinal curvatures. Radiol Clin North Am. 1975;13(1): 113-121.

[14] Hutter CG. Posterior intervertebral body fusion. A 25-year study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;(179): 86-96.

[15] Goldstein C, Drew B. When is a spine fused? Injury. 2011; 42(3): 306-313.

[16] Behrbalk E, Uri O, Parks RM, et al. Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(12): 2869-2875.

[17] Korovessis P, Koureas G, Zacharatos S, et al. Correlative radiological, self-assessment and clinical analysis of evolution in instrumented dorsal and lateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Autograft versus coralline hydroxyapatite. Eur Spine J. 2005; 14(7): 630-638.

[18] Glaser J, Stanley M, Sayre H, et al. A 10-year follow-up evaluation of lumbar spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(13): 1390-1395.

[19] Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Griffith SL, et al. The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion. History, techniques, and 2-year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(11): 1267-1278; discussion 1279.

[20] McAfee PC, Boden SD, Brantigan JM, et al. Symposium: a critical discrepancy-a criteria of successful arthrodesis following interbody spinal fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(3): 320-334.

[21] Burkus JK, Foley K, Haid RW, et al. Surgical Interbody Research Group--radiographic assessment of interbody fusion devices: fusion criteria for anterior lumbar interbody surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;10(4): E11.

[22] Kanayama M, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, et al. A prospective randomized study of posterolateral lumbar fusion using osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1) versus local autograft with ceramic bone substitute: emphasis of surgical exploration and histologic assessment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(10): 1067-1074.

[23] Lee CS, Chung SS, Choi SW, et al. Critical length of fusion requiring additional fixation to prevent nonunion of the lumbosacral junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(6): E206-211.

[24] Ghiselli G, Wharton N, Hipp JA, et al. Prospective analysis of imaging prediction of pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: computed tomography versus flexion-extension motion analysis with intraoperative correlation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(6): 463-468.

[25] Cannada LK, Scherping SC, Yoo JU, et al. Pseudoarthrosis of the cervical spine: a comparison of radiographic diagnostic measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(1): 46-51.

[26] Taylor M, Hipp JA, Gertzbein SD, et al. Observer agreement in assessing flexion-extension X-rays of the cervical spine, with and without the use of quantitative measurements of intervertebral motion. Spine J. 2007;7(6): 654-658.

[27] Ito Z, Imagama S, Kanemura T, et al. Volumetric change in interbody bone graft after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): a prospective study. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(10): 2144-2149.

[28] Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Djurasovic M. Reliability and agreement between fine-cut CT scans and plain radiography in the evaluation of posterolateral fusions. Spine J. 2007; 7(1): 39-43.

[29] Stradiotti P, Curti A, Castellazzi G, et al. Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art. Eur Spine J. 2009;18 Suppl 1: 102-108.

[30] Williams AL, Gornet MF, Burkus JK. CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(8): 2057-2066.

[31] Siepe CJ, Stosch-Wiechert K, Heider F, et al. Anterior stand-alone fusion revisited: a prospective clinical, X-ray and CT investigation. Eur Spine J. 2014.

[32] Takeuchi M, Kamiya M, Wakao N, et al. Large volume inside the cage leading incomplete interbody bone fusion and residual back pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Rev. 2015.

[33] Biswas D, Bible JE, Bohan M, et al. Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):1882-1889.

[34] Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(9): 849-857.

[35] Gruskay JA, Webb ML, Grauer JN. Methods of evaluating lumbar and cervical fusion. Spine J. 2014;14(3): 531-539.

[36] Albert TJ, Pinto M, Smith MD, et al. Accuracy of SPECT scanning in diagnosing pseudoarthrosis: a prospective study. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11(3): 197-199.

[37] Concia E, Prandini N, Massari L, et al. Osteomyelitis: clinical update for practical guidelines. Nucl Med Commun. 2006; 27(8): 645-660.

[38] Buchowski JM, Liu G, Bunmaprasert T, et al. Anterior cervical fusion assessment: surgical exploration versus radiographic evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(11): 1185-1191.

[39] Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Schwender JD, et al. Reliability and accuracy of fine-cut computed tomography scans to determine the status of anterior interbody fusions with metallic cages. Spine J. 2008;8(6): 998-1002.

[40] Sugiyama S, Wullschleger M, Wilson K, et al. Reliability of clinical measurement for assessing spinal fusion: an experimental sheep study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(9): 763-768.