Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2015, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (37): 6060-6063.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.37.028

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Reliability of pressure biofeedback instrument in patients with low back pain

Dong Yu-lin1, 2, Wang Xue-qiang1, 2, Hu Jing-yun1, 2   

  1. 1Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China; 2Orthopedics Hospital, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China
  • Online:2015-09-10 Published:2015-09-10
  • Contact: Wang Xue-qiang, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China; Orthopedics Hospital, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China
  • About author:Dong Yu-lin, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China; Orthopedics Hospital, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China
  • Supported by:

    the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81501956; the Young Scientific Talent Plan of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission, No.15YF1411400; the Scientific Innovation Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission, No. 15ZZ084; Graduate Education and Innovation Fund of Shanghai University of Sport, No. yjscx2014008

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Treatment programs for low back pain are of great varieties, but there is still no a definite treatment. Pressure biofeedback instrument is a tool to measure abdominal muscle activity, and its reliability in the treatment of low back pain is less reported.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the reliability and feasibility of the pressure biofeedback instrument for assessment of low back pain.

METHODS: Thirty patients with chronic low back pain were enrolled and subject to four kinds of postures: posture A was prone position; posture B was supine position with flexion of the knee joints, posture C was supine position with unilateral flexion of the hip and knee joint, posture D was prone position with unilateral shoulder flexion. Intra-abdominal pressure values under the different postures were measured twice within a week in the same subject. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the reliability.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Posture A had good test-retest reliability, and the value of ICC was 0.853 (95% confidence interval: 0.691-0.930); posture B showed moderate test-retest reliability, and the ICC value was 0.751 (95% confidence interval: 0.477-0.882); posture C also had moderate test-retest reliability, and the ICC value was 0.789 (95% confidence interval: 0.557-0.900), posture D had good test-retest reliability, and the value of ICC was 0.892 (95% confidence interval: 0.641-0.919). Therefore, the pressure biofeedback for evaluation of low back pain has good reliability, which can be used for the evaluation of low back pain.

 中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:组织构建;骨细胞;软骨细胞;细胞培养;成纤维细胞;血管内皮细胞;骨质疏松组织工程

Key words: headings, Low Back Pain, Pressure

CLC Number: