Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2015, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (26): 4107-4111.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.26.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Bone cement versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty in the middle-aged patients: 5-year follow-up 

Li Jing-yang, Liu Zhen-feng, Qiao Wei-min, Fang Rui   

  1. Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Third Department of Orthopedics, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Chinese Medicine Hospital, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2015-04-03 Online:2015-06-25 Published:2015-06-25
  • Contact: Qiao Wei-min, Associate chief physician, Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Third Department of Orthopedics, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Chinese Medicine Hospital, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
  • About author:Li JY, Liu ZF, Qiao WM, Fang R. Bone cement versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty in the middle-aged patients: 5-year follow-up. Zhongguo Zuzhi Gongcheng Yanjiu. 2015;19(26):4107-4111.
  • Supported by:

    the Science and Technology Support Program of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, No. 201433110

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Currently, the study of total hip arthroplasty in elderly is more. Perioperative treatment and postoperative rehabilitation are increasingly perfect, but the study of middle-aged total hip arthroplasty is less, especially long curative effect in postoperative and long-term follow-up still has many problems to be solved. In China, there are few studies addressing how to select the prosthesis during total hip arthroplasty in middle-aged patients, which kind or material of prosthesis is better, so the evidence for clinical application is less.
OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the repair effects of bone cement total hip arthroplasty and uncemented total hip arthroplasty in middle-aged patients.
METHODS: A total of 60 middle-aged patients who received total hip arthroplasty in the Department of Orthopedics, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Chinese Medicine Hospital from January 2005 to January 2008 
were followed up for 5 years. Their mean age was (37±6) years. There were 32 cases undergoing uncemented total hip arthroplasty and 28 cases receiving bone cement total hip arthroplasty. At 6 months, 2 and 5 years after replacement, Harris score for recovery of limb function and imaging findings were compared and analyzed.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Harris score for recovery of limb function was significantly better in the uncemented total hip arthroplasty group than in the bone cement total hip arthroplasty group at 6 months, 2 and 5 years after replacement (P < 0.01). No complications were found at 6 months in the uncemented total hip arthroplasty group, but one case affected osteolysis at 2 years and two cases experienced prosthesis loosing at 5 years after arthroplasty. In the bone cement total hip arthroplasty group, two cases had osteolysis and one case had prosthesis loosing at 6 months after arthroplasty, three cases had prosthesis loosing at 2 years, and two cases affected linear permeability dissolvement at 5 years after arthroplasty. These findings suggest that uncemented prosthesis achieved a high rate of functional restoration and a low rate of complications in middle-aged patients. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty had satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes at a minimum of 5-year follow-up.
 

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:人工关节;骨植入物;脊柱骨折;内固定;数字化骨科;组织工程

Key words: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Hip Prosthesis, Bioprosthesis

CLC Number: