Absorbable rod versus Herbert screw for radial head fractures: therapeutic effects and treatment costs

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.26.010

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Mason II type and III type radial head fractures with massive bone are mainly treated by open reduction and metal fixation, but metal implants have to be removed in the second operation, which increased patients’ travail and financial burden. Absorbable screw/rod also can be used to treat radial head fractures, and has its special advantages due to the low price and no second operation.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical therapeutic effects of absorbable rod and Herbert screw for the treatment of Mason II or III type radial head fractures.
METHODS: A total of 80 patients with Mason II and III type radial head fractures were equally assigned to experimental and control groups. They received open reduction and internal fixation. The experimental group was treated with absorbable rod and the control group received Herbert screw.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 79 patients were followed up for averagely 34 months. No significant difference in average operative time, fracture healing time, Broberg and Morrey elbow scores and incidence of complications was detected between the experimental and control groups (P > 0.05). However, treatment costs were lower in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Results indicated that the therapeutic effects between absorbable rod and Herbert screw for Mason II or III type radial head fractures were similar. However, absorbable rod for radial head fractures can avoid the second operation for removal of the implant. Therefore, we recommend absorbable rod in the choice of internal fixation materials.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：人工关节；骨植入物；脊柱；骨折；内固定；数字化骨科；组织工程

全文链接：

Key words: fracture fixation, intramedullary, bone nails, radius fractures, absorbable implants

CLC Number:

R318

Wang Si-cheng, Zhang You-zhong, Yang Guo-qing, He Jin-guo, Fang Yang, Liu Xiang-fei, Wu Xian-min, Yang Xiao-yu. Absorbable rod versus Herbert screw for radial head fractures: therapeutic effects and treatment costs[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2014, 18(26): 4153-4157.

Figures/Tables 6

References

[1]Givissis PK, Symeonidis PD, Ditsios KT, et al. Late results of absorbable pin fixation in the treatment of radial head fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(5):1217-1224.
[2]Mason ML. Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a review of one hundred cases. Br J Surg. 1954; 42(172):123-132.
[3]赵勇,竺湘江,宋南炎,等.克氏针与微型钢板治疗MasonⅡ型及Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折的病例对照研究[J].中国骨伤,2012,25(4): 310-312.
[4]王维光,刘万军,王振海,等.不同内固定方法治疗Mason Ⅱ型桡骨头骨折临床效果的对比研究 [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009, 17(22):1700-1703.
[5]陈碌昆,罗鹰.可吸收棒内固定治疗MasonⅡ、Ⅲ型成人桡骨小头骨折[J].广东医学,2010,31(9):1185-1186.
[6]冯宇,朱颖华,程光齐.可吸收钉棒治疗粉碎性桡骨头骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2011,14(1):28-30.
[7]Hirvensalo E, Böstman O, Rokkanen P. Absorbable polyglycolide pins in fixation of displaced fractures of the radial head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1990;109(5):258-261.
[8]Jahn R, Diederichs D, Friedrich B. Resorbable implants and their use exemplified by fracture of the head of the radius. Aktuelle Traumatol. 1989;19(6):281-286.
[9]Pelto K, Hirvensalo E, Böstman O, et al. Treatment of radial head fractures with absorbable polyglycolide pins: a study on the security of the fixation in 38 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8(2):94-98.
[10]Rehm KE, Helling HJ, Claes L. Report of the Biodegradable Implants Study Group. Aktuelle Traumatol. 1994;24(2):70-73.
[11]Helling HJ, Prokop A, Schmid HU, et al. Biodegradable implants versus standard metal fixation for displaced radial head fractures. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(4):479-485.
[12]邢丹谋,勘武生,任东等.可吸收自身增强软骨钉治疗桡骨小头骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2013,33(1):50-54.
[13]Broberg MA, Morrey BF. Results of delayed excision of the radial head after fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(5): 669-674.
[14]Weiler A, Helling HJ, Kirch U, et al. Foreign-body reaction and the course of osteolysis after polyglycolide implants for fracture fixation: experimental study in sheep. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(3):369-376.
[15]Dooley JF, Angus PD. The importance of elbow aspiration when treating radial head fractures. Arch Emerg Med. 1991; 8(2):117-121.
[16]Struijs PA, Smit G, Steller EP. Radial head fractures: effectiveness of conservative treatment versus surgical intervention. A systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(2):125-130.
[17]梅国华,张长青,罗从风,等.MasonⅠ、Ⅱ型桡骨小头骨折非手术治疗的比较研究[J].中华手外科杂志,2005,21(3):151-153.
[18]Hotchkiss RN. Fractures of the radial head and related instability and contracture of the forearm. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:173-177.
[19]Kelberine F, Bassères B, Curvale G, et al. Fractures of the radial head. Analysis of a series of 62 surgically treated cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1991;77(5):322-328.
[20]Khalfayan EE, Culp RW, Alexander AH. Mason type II radial head fractures: operative versus nonoperative treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6(3):283-289.
[21]蔡晓冰,纪方,曹磊,等.微型钢板治疗Mason Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折的疗效分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(2):104-106.
[22]Heim U, Trüb HJ. Experiences with primary osteosynthesis in radial head fractures. Helv Chir Acta. 1978;45(1-2):63-69.
[23]王思成,刘祥飞,杨国庆,等.桡骨小头置换与切开复位内固定：治疗粉碎性桡骨小头骨折谁更有优势？[J].中国组织工程研究, 2014,18(13):2031-2036.
[24]温纪林,杨峻刘,江华等.两种方法治疗桡骨小头骨折的疗效研究[J].实用骨科杂志,2013,19(7):591-594.
[25]Böstman OM, Pihlajamäki HK. Adverse tissue reactions to bioabsorbable fixation devices. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; (371):216-227.
[26]26Prokop A, Jubel A, Helling HJ, et al. Soft tissue reactions of different biodegradable polylactide implants. Biomaterials. 2004;25(2):259-267.
[27]Ignatius AA, Augat P, Claes LE. Degradation behavior of composite pins made of tricalcium phosphate and poly(L,DL-lactide). J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2001;12(2): 185-194.
[28]Givissis PK, Symeonidis PD, Ditsios KT, et al. Late results of absorbable pin fixation in the treatment of radial head fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(5):1217-1224.