Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2012, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (17): 3164-3167.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2012.17.029

Previous Articles     Next Articles

r angle measurement of the different sagittal skeletal pattern

Fu Wei1, Hou Xiao-li2, Ding Yuan-feng1, Wang Pei-jun1, Han Jing-ying1   

  1. 1Department of Orthodontics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin  150086, Heilongjiang Province, China; 2College of Stomatology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin  150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
  • Received:2012-01-04 Revised:2012-02-03 Online:2012-04-22 Published:2012-04-22
  • Contact: Han Jing-ying, Doctor, Attending physician, Department of Orthodontics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang Province, China jingying5787@163.com
  • About author:Fu Wei★, Studying for master’s degree, Department of Orthodontics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang Province, China zhimayan0107@163.com

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: An accurate anteroposterior measurement of jaw relationships is critically important in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. There are some disadvantages in current cephalometric methods.
OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new cephalometric measurement, named the r angle, in order to express the sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible with accuracy and reproducibility.
METHODS: One hundred and eighty patients aged 13-25 years were selected to take the pre-treatment cephalometric radiographs. They were divided into skeletal Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ groups on the basis of four standards. The different malocclusion types for the r angle were calculated. Finally, the differences between genders were analyzed.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: ①The r values of skeletal Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ were (40.84±3.10)°, (48.85±3.09)° and (26.12±4.76)° respectively. ②There were no statistically significant differences of r value between genders. It indicates that r angle can express the sagittal relationship with good repeatability. r angle between 35 and 45 degrees can be considered to have a Class Ⅰ skeletal pattern. With an angle less than 35 degrees, patients are considered to have a skeletal Class Ⅲ relationship and with an angle greater than 45 degrees, patients have a skeletal Class Ⅱ relationship.
 

CLC Number: