Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2014, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (9): 1325-1330.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.09.003

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analgesic effects of intraarticular cocktail versus intravenous parecoxib injection after total hip arthroplasty

Du Xue-ping1, Lu Jian-quan1, Xu Ping1, Zhu Yu-chang2, Dong Da-yong1   

  1. 1 Qidong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Qidong Branch, Tenth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University), Qidong 226200, Jiangsu Province, China; 2 Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
  • Online:2014-02-26 Published:2014-02-26
  • Contact: Lu Jian-quan, Associate chief physician, Qidong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Qidong Branch, Tenth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University), Qidong 226200, Jiangsu Province, China
  • About author:Du Xue-ping, Studying for master’s degree, Attending physician, Qidong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Qidong Branch, Tenth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University), Qidong 226200, Jiangsu Province, China

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Intraarticular cocktail analgesic injection is a popular postoperative analgesia method and can effectively control postoperative pain and relieve side effects after total hip arthroplasty.
OBJECTIVE: To compare and assess the effectiveness and safety of intraarticular analgesic injection or intravenous injection of parecoxib after total hip arthroplasty.
METHODS: A total of 60 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were randomly assigned to: treatment group (intraarticular cocktail analgesic injection with morphine, bupivacaine, and compound betamethasone), and control group (intravenous injection of parecoxib). All patients received tramadol hydrochloride at 24 hours after replacement. Analgesic consumption, visual analog scale at rest and during activity, range of motion, and postoperative complication of patients in each group were recorded.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Intraarticular cocktail analgesic injection significantly reduced analgesic consumption. When comparing visual analog scale scores, rest pain scores were significantly less in the treatment group at 12, 24 and 48 hours after replacement than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Scores on range of motion were significantly less in the treatment group at 24 and 36 hours than that in the control group(P < 0.05). No significant differences in total complications were detectable between the treatment and control groups (P > 0.05). Results suggested that intraarticular cocktail analgesic injection lessened analgesic consumption after replacement, relieved early pain after replacement, and contributed to early rehabilitation of patients. Moreover, no significant adverse reactions were visible.


中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:人工关节;骨植入物;脊柱骨折;内固定;数字化骨科;组织工程


全文链接:

CLC Number: