Mechanical stability of intertrochanteric fracture of femur with different internal fixation systems

doi:10.12307/2025.105

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Intertrochanteric fracture of femur has various fracture types and fixation methods, and the mechanical stability of each fixation system is quite different. It is of scientific clinical significance to use finite element analysis method to carry out biomechanical research on various fixation systems.
OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the mechanical stability of various internal fixations applied to femoral intertrochanteric fracture A031-A2.1 by finite element method.
METHODS: Based on the validated finite element model of femur (Intact), the model was cut and made into A031-A2.1 intertrochanteric fracture of femur. Different internal fixation systems were implanted by simulating clinical operation methods, and fixation models of proximal femoral nail antirotation, dynamic hip screw, percutaneous compression plate and proximal femoral locking plate were established respectively. All nodes under the distal femur of the four groups of models were constrained, and compression loads of 700, 1 400 and 2 100 N were applied to the femoral head. Von Mises stress distribution and compression stiffness of each group of models were observed through calculation and analysis, and mechanical stability of each group was compared.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Through calculation and analysis, after calculating the compression stiffness by comparing the deformation of each model, the compression stiffness of each model under various loads showed the trend: physiological group > proximal femoral nail antirotation group > proximal femoral locking plate group > percutaneous compression plate group > dynamic hip screw group. The compressive stiffness of the complete physiological group model was significantly higher than that of all surgical group models. (2) The stress index was observed. Due to the stress shielding effect, the stress peak value of each fixed group was higher than that of physiological group, and the maximum peak value was concentrated on each internal fixation. Proximal femoral nail antirotation group had the smallest stress peak, while dynamic hip screw group had the highest stress. The stress distribution trend showed physiological group < proximal femoral nail antirotation group < percutaneous compression plate group < proximal femoral locking plate group < dynamic hip screw group. (3) The stress distribution in the bone model showed different results depending on the implantation location of internal fixation. (4) It is concluded that for intertrochanteric fracture of femur, all kinds of internal fixation can effectively fix it. Combined with the results of finite element analysis, proximal femoral nail antirotation group is a better internal fixation choice, showing the characteristics of small deformation, low stress peak, and uniform stress distribution. The mechanical effect of percutaneous compression plate group and proximal femoral locking plate group is excellent, and the fixation effect is close to proximal femoral nail antirotation fixation. The fixation effect of dynamic hip screw is not good, and the mechanical stability of this group is poor compared with other internal fixation.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：人工关节；骨植入物；脊柱；骨折；内固定；数字化骨科；组织工程

Key words: intertrochanteric fracture of femur, internal fixation system, mechanical stability, finite element analysis, equivalent stress, compression stiffness

CLC Number:

Chen Xi, Tang Tao, Chen Tongbing, Li Qing, Zhang Wen. Mechanical stability of intertrochanteric fracture of femur with different internal fixation systems[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2025, 29(9): 1783-1788.

Figures/Tables 5

References

[1] RAAS C, HOFMANN-FLIRI L, HÖRMANN R, et al. Prophylactic augmentation of the proximal femur: an investigation of two techniques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(3):345-351.
[2] CHO HM, CHOI SM, PARK JY, et al. A finite element analysis and cyclic load experiment on an additional transcortical-type hole formed around the proximal femoral nail system’s distal locking screw. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):92.
[3] KOVALAK E, ERMUTLU C, ATAY T, et al. Management of unstable pertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral locking compression plates and affect of neck-shaft angle on functional outcomes. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017;8(3):209-214.
[4] LI S, SU Z, ZHU J, et al. The importance of the thickness of femoral lateral wall for treating intertrochanteric fractures: a finite elements analysis. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):12679.
[5] SHEEHAN KJ, SOBOLEV B, GUY P. Mortality by Timing of Hip Fracture Surgery: Factors and Relationships at Play. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(20):e106.
[6] KIM J, OH C, KIM B, et al. Structure-mechanical analysis of various fixation constructs for basicervical fractures of the proximal femur and clinical implications; finite element analysis. Injury. 2023;54(2): 370-378.
[7] GOMEZ-VALLEJO J, BLANCO-RUBIO N, LORENZO-LOPEZ R, et al. Outcomes of basicervical femoral neck fracture treated with percutaneous compression plate (PCCP). Injury. 2021;52S42-S46.
[8] CHEN Y, LI H, DAI L, et al. Imaging observation of percutaneous compression plate use in promoting femoral neck fracture healing. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(8):030006052110335.
[9] ZHU J, LI Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Clinical Outcome and Biomechanical Analysis of Dynamic Hip Screw Combined with Derotation Screw in Treating Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures Based on Different Reduction Qualities in Young Patients (≤65 Years of Age). Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:9505667.
[10] DING K, ZHU Y, WANG H, et al. A comparative Study of Novel Extramedullary Fixation and Dynamic Hip Screw in the Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Finite-Element Analysis. Front Surg. 2022;9:911141.
[11] 恽常军, 钱文杰, 张杰, 等. 肱骨近端锁定接骨板固定治疗Vancouver B1型股骨假体周围骨折生物力学特性的有限元分析[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2021,23(9):798-803.
[12] 艾克白尔·吐逊, 阿吉木·克热木, 谢增如, 等. 两种内固定方式固定青壮年不稳定型股骨颈骨折生物力学特性的有限元分析[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2020,22(9):793-798.
[13] SUN H, ZHANG H, WANG T, et al. Biomechanical and Finite-Element Analysis of Femoral Pin-Site Fractures Following Navigation-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104(19):1738-1749.
[14] LI J, WANG M, LI L, et al. Finite element analysis of different configurations of fully threaded cannulated screw in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):272.
[15] GARDNER MP, CHONG ACM, POLLOCK AG, et al. Mechanical evaluation of large-size fourth-generation composite femur and tibia models. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(3):613-620.
[16] HEINER AD. Structural properties of fourth-generation composite femurs and tibias. J Biomech. 2008;41(15):3282-3284.
[17] MA L, ZHOU Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Biomechanical evaluation with finite element analysis of the reconstruction of femoral tumor defects by using a double-barrel free vascularized fibular graft combined with a locking plate. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(9):2425-2434.
[18] CHANG C, CHEN Y, LI C, et al. Role of the compression screw in the dynamic hip–screw system: A finite-element study. Medical Engineering & Physics. 2015;37(12):1174-1179.
[19] ME T, KE T, MAR F, et al. Stress and strain distribution within the intact femur: compression or bending? Med Eng Phys. 1996;18(2):122-131.
[20] CUI Y, XING W, PAN Z, et al. Characterization of novel intramedullary nailing method for treating femoral shaft fracture through finite element analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2020;20(2):748-753.
[21] WANG J, MA J, LU B, et al. Comparative finite element analysis of three implants fixing stable and unstable subtrochanteric femoral fractures: Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA), Proximal Femoral Locking Plate (PFLP), and Reverse Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106(1):95-101.
[22] 张睿, 罗鹏, 胡炜, 等. 新型股骨近端内侧支撑钢板治疗股骨反转子间骨折的生物力学研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2017,31(2): 165-170.
[23] WANG Y, CHEN W, ZHANG L, et al. Finite Element Analysis of Proximal Femur Bionic Nail (PFBN) Compared with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and InterTan in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(9):2245-2255.
[24] NAVARRO M, MICHIARDI A, CASTA OO, et al. Biomaterials in orthopaedics. J R Soc Interface. 2008;5(27):1137-1158.
[25] CHEUNG CL, ANG SB, CHADHA M, et al. An updated hip fracture projection in Asia: The Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies study. Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2018;4(1):16-21.
[26] HELWIG P, FAUST G, HINDENLANG U, et al. Finite element analysis of four different implants inserted in different positions to stabilize an idealized trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury. 2009;40(3):288-295.
[27] KWAK DK, KIM WH, LEE SJ, et al. Biomechanical Comparison of Three Different Intramedullary Nails for Fixation of Unstable Basicervical Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur: Experimental Studies. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:7618079.
[28] PAPINI M, ZDERO R, SCHEMITSCH EH, et al. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs. J Biomech Eng. 2007;129(1):12-19.
[29] HEINER AD, BROWN TD. Structural properties of a new design of composite replicate femurs and tibias. J Biomech. 2001;34:773-781.
[30] CRISTOFOLINI L, VICECONTI M, CAPPELLO A, et al. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur model. J Biomech. 1996; 29(4):525-535.
[31] WANG H, YANG W, DING K, et al. Biomechanical study on the stability and strain conduction of intertrochanteric fracture fixed with proximal femoral nail antirotation versus triangular supporting intramedullary nail. Int Orthop. 2021;46(2):341-350.
[32] BRANDT SE, LEFEVER S, JANZING HMJ, et al. Percutaneous compression plating (PCCP) versus the dynamic hip screw for pertrochanteric hip fractures: preliminary results. Injury. 2002;33:413-428.
[33] KRISCHAK GD, AUGAT P, BECK A, et al. Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate. Clin Biomech. 2007;22(10):1112-1118.
[34] 张凯瑞. 动力髋螺钉与经皮加压钢板固定股骨转子间骨折的三维有限元分析[D]. 广州:南方医科大学,2009.
[35] SOYLEMEZ M, OZKAN K, T RKMEN I, et al. A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation A study on synthetic bones. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49(3):347.
[36] IBRAHIM S, MELEPPURAM JJ. A retrospective analysis of surgically-treated complex proximal femur fractures with proximal femoral locking compression plate. Rev Bras Ortop. 2017;52(6):644-650.
[37] GAO Z, WANG M, SHEN B, et al. Treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture with medial femoral neck support screw: a biomechanical and clinical study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):21418.
[38] RAINA DB, MARKEVICIUTE V, STRAVINSKAS M, et al. A New Augmentation Method for Improved Screw Fixation in Fragile Bone. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:816250.
[39] ZENG W, LIU Y, HOU X. Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation implants for femoral neck fractures: A comparative finite element analysis. Comput Meth Prog Bio. 2020;196:105714.
[40] NODA M, NAKAMURA Y, ADACHI K, et al. Dynamic finite element analysis of implants for femoral neck fractures simulating walking. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;26(2):230949901877789.