Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of percutaneous curved vertebroplasty and unilateral pedicle approach percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2946

Abstract

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: It remains disputed whether percutaneous curved vertebroplasty and unilateral pedicle approach percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. This study systematically analyzed the efficacy and safety of percutaneous curved vertebroplasty and unilateral pedicle approach percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.
METHODS: A computer-based online search of Wanfang, VIP, CNKI, PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane library, and CBM was performed to retrieve randomized controlled trial studies regarding percutaneous curved vertebroplasty and unilateral pedicle approach percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture published before January 2020. Related papers were manually searched. After two evaluators independently selected literature, data were extracted and the quality of methodology included in the study was evaluated. Meta-analysis was carried out by using Stata/SE 12.0 software.
RESULTS: (1) A total of eight randomized controlled trials were conducted, including 628 patients, of whom 394 were treated with percutaneous curved vertebroplasty and 404 with unilateral pedicle approach percutaneous vertebroplasty. (2) The meta-analysis results showed that visual analogue scale score [MD=-0.20, 95%CI(-0.28, -0.12), P < 0.05], the leakage rate of bone cement [RR=0.30, 95%CI(0.15, 0.58), P < 0.05], and the total distribution rate of bone cement in the center of vertebral body [RR=1.27, 95%CI(1.12, 1.45), P < 0.05] were better in the percutaneous curved vertebroplasty group than those in the unilateral pedicle approach percutaneous vertebroplasty group. (3) There was no significant difference in Oswestry disability index score [MD=-4.83, 95%CI (-9.71, 0.05), P=0.052], operation time [MD=-1.45, 95%CI(-5.91, 2.82), P=0.488]and X-ray exposure times [MD=-0.70, 95%CI(-2.11, 0.71), P=0.33] between the two methods.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty exhibits significant advantages in analgesic effect, low leakage rate of bone cement and the high total distribution rate of bone cement in the center over unilateral pedicle approach percutaneous vertebroplasty. Therefore, a large number of high-quality multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to provide more evidence.

Key words: bone, bone cement, curved, vertebroplasty, pedicle, osteoporosis, vertebral compression fracture, meta-analysis

CLC Number:

Zhong Yuanming, Wan Tong, Zhong Xifeng, Wu Zhuotan, He Bingkun, Wu Sixian. Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of percutaneous curved vertebroplasty and unilateral pedicle approach percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(3): 456-462.

Figures/Tables 10

References

[1] WU Q, XIAO X, XU Y. Evaluating the Performance of the WHO International Reference Standard for Osteoporosis Diagnosis in Postmenopausal Women of Varied Polygenic Score and Race. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):499.
[2] LA BARBERA L, CIANFONI A, FERRARI A, et al. Stent-Screw Assisted Internal Fixation of Osteoporotic Vertebrae: A Comparative Finite Element Analysis on SAIF Technique. Front Bioeng Biotechnol . 2019;7: 291.
[3] ZHONG R, LIU J, WANG R, et al. Unilateral curved versus bipedicular vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. BMC Surg. 2019;19(1): 193.
[4] HOSOGANE N, NOJIRI K, SUZUKI S, et al. Surgical Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture with Neurological Deficit-A Nationwide Multicenter Study in Japan. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019;3(4): 361-367.
[5] ZHU Y, CHENG J, YIN J, et al. Therapeutic effect of kyphoplasty and balloon vertebroplasty on osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. 2019; 98(45): e17810.
[6] FUSCO A. Benefits and harms of percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a cochrane review summary with commentary. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98(12): 1151-1152.
[7] ORHURHU V, AGUDILE E, CHU R, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of spine augmentation for patients with osteoporotic fractures: an analysis of National Inpatient Sample from 2011 to 2015. Spine J. 2020;20(4):547-555.
[8] ZHANG Y, LIU H, HE F, et al. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty assisted with O-arm navigation for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures at T6 to T9 vertebrae. Int Orthop. 2020;44(2): 349-355.
[9] BALAZSFI M, KIS D, TOTH T, et al. Radiofrequency facet joint denervation efficiency based on the severity of spondylarthrosis and in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A retrospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019;186:105497.
[10] ZUO XH, ZHU XP, BAO HG, et al. Network meta-analysis of percutaneous vertebroplasty, percutaneous kyphoplasty, nerve block, and conservative treatment for nonsurgery options of acute/subacute and chronic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) in short-term and long-term effects. Medicine. 2018;97(29): e11544.
[11] WANG B, ZHAO CP, SONG LX, et al. Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):264.
[12] TSOUMAKIDOU G, TOO C W, KOCH G, et al. CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(3):331-42.
[13] ZHAO S, XU C Y, ZHU A R, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 3 treatments for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A network meta-analysis. Medicine. 2017;96(26):e7328.
[14] ZHANG Z, JIAO F, HUANG H, et al. A second puncture and injection technique for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):413.
[15] 印平,马远征,马迅,等.骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的治疗指南[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2015,21(6):643-648.
[16] CHENG Y, LIU Y. Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty in the treatment of thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(6):2424-2433.
[17] 朱迪,尚春风,刘宏建,等.弯角穿刺针椎体成形技术治疗胸、腰椎骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2019,39(12):737-746.
[18] 高利航.弯角穿刺经皮椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的效果分析[J].河南医学研究,2017,26(22):4159-4160.
[19] 康健,陈文明,黄华伟.弯角椎体成形术在骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的临床应用[J].临床医药实践,2019,28(6):426-428.
[20] 林玉江,林茜,杨利民,等.弯角椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2017, 27(5):423-428.
[21] 周权发,刘宏建,寇红伟,等.弯角椎体成形装置的早期疗效评估及对骨水泥分布的影响[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(10):892-897.
[22] 肖伟平,邱全河,余艺萍,等.单侧弯角椎体成形术与传统椎体成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体骨折的疗效比较[J].江西中医药大学学报,2019,31(6):45-49.
[23] 钟发明,肖伟平,邱全河,等.弯角经皮椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折临床疗效研究[J].重庆医学,2019,48(A01):213-215.
[24] SARACEN A, KOTWICA Z. Vertebroplasty (PVP) is effective in the treatment of painful vertebral hemangiomas . Acta orthopaedica Belgica. 2018; 84(1):105-107.
[25] RAHIMIZADEH A. Kyphosis and canal compromise due to refracturing of an L1 cemented vertebra managed with posterior surgery alone. Surg Neurol Int. 2019;10:212.
[26] ALHASHASH M, SHOUSHA M, BARAKAT A S, et al. Effects of polymethylmethacrylate cement viscosity and bone porosity on cement leakage and new vertebral fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a prospective study. Global Spine J. 2019; 9(7): 754-760.

[27] ZHANG Y, SHI L, TANG P, et al. Comparison of the efficacy between two micro-operative therapies of old patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a network meta-analysis. J Cell Biochem. 2017; 118(10): 3205-3212.
[28] MA Y, WU X, XIAO X, et al. Effects of teriparatide versus percutaneous vertebroplasty on pain relief, quality of life and cost-effectiveness in postmenopausal females with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A prospective cohort study. Bone. 2020;131:115154.
[29] TANG J, GUO WC, HU JF, et al. Unilateral and bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic compression fractures. J Coll Phys Surg Pak. 2019;29(10): 946-950.
[30] KHAN M, KUSHCHAYEV SV. Percutaneous vertebral body augmentations: the state of art. Neuroimaging Clin North Am. 2019;29(4): 495-513.
[31] SUN X, LIU X, WANG J, et al. The effect of early limited activity after bipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty to treat acute painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Pain Physician. 2020; 23(1):E31-e40.
[32] LI J, LIN J, XU J, et al. A Novel Approach for Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Based on Preoperative Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional Model Design. World Neurosurg. 2017;105:20-26.
[33] 寇红伟,周权发,刘宏建, 等.弯角椎体成形装置对单侧椎弓根穿刺角度及骨水泥分布的影响[J].中华实验外科杂志,2017,34(2): 338-341.
[34] HUNT CH, KALLMES DF, THIELEN KR. A unilateral vertebroplasty approach using a curved injection cannula for directed, site-specific vertebral body filling. J Vasc Int Radiol.2009; 20(4): 553-555.
[35] 周晓,陈宝,戴加平,等.单侧弯角椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性压缩性骨折的疗效[J].临床骨科杂志,2018,21(3):287-290.
[36] 邓书洲.弯角穿刺经皮椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床研究[J].颈腰痛杂志,2019,40(5):645-647.
[37] 钟睿,姜威,熊森, 等.单侧弯角与直行入路椎体成形治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折疗效的对照研究[J].中华创伤杂志,2018, 34(2): 102-108.
[38] OH Y, LEE B, LEE S, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment using a transdermal fentanyl patch for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2019;62(5): 594-602.
[39] HU W, KAN SL, XU HB, et al. Thoracic aggressive vertebral hemangioma with neurologic deficit: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine. 2018; 97(41): e12775.
[40] 郑昊,杜伟,吕游,等.弯角式椎体成形套管在老年骨质疏松椎骨压缩性骨折中的应用价值分析[J].心理月刊,2018,13(10):174+173.