Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2015, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (24): 3855-3859.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.24.016

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dimethyl sulfoxide acts as a protective agent to perfuse rabbit amputated limbs: the relative recovery of local drug concentrations

An Zhuo-ling1, Ding Kun2, Liu Chun-sheng2, Zhu Ze-xing2, Zhou Jing-chao2, Zhang Zhen2, Zhang Shu-ming2, Wang Dan2   

  1. 1Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China; 
    2the Second Artillery General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100088, China
  • Online:2015-06-11 Published:2015-06-11
  • Contact: Wang Dan, Pharmacist in charge, the Second Artillery General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100088, China
  • About author:An Zhuo-ling, Master, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
  • Supported by:

    the Medicine and Health Research Foundation of PLA during the Eleventh Five-Year Period, No. 08G051; the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81301662, 81341015

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The effect of dimethyl sulfoxide cryoprotectants has been got a lot of verification in the low-temperature medical applications. But there is no literature addressing microdialysis detection of dimethyl sulfoxide cryoprotectants.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the microdialysis relative recovery of different concentrations of dimethyl sulfoxide cryoprotectants used for limb reattachment.
METHODS: In vitro linear probe relative recovery of different concentrations of dimethyl sulfoxide (2%, 5%, 8%) was detected by retrodialysis gain and loss method. The correction in vivo experiment was done to estimate dimethyl sulfoxide relative recovery in rabbit amputated limbs.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The relative recoveries of different concentrations of dimethyl sulfoxide (2%, 5%, 8%) were (49.49±3.56)%, (46.30±1.48)%, (52.66±2.54)% using retrodialysis gain method and (50.99±6.89)%, (43.86±1.35)%, (50.67±0.75)% using retrodialysis loss method. The average recoveries were (49.48±3.18)% and (48.51±4.03)%, respectively. There was no difference in the relative recovery of dimethyl sulfoxide detected using two methods. The change of dimethyl sulfoxide concentration could not influence the retrodialysis gain and loss method calibration results. The recovery was (15.45±4.8)% in vivo. These findings indicate that the microdialysis technology is suitable for dimethyl sulfoxide sampling in vivo that has no obvious influence on the relative recovery.

 

Key words: Dimethyl Sulfoxide, Microdialysis

CLC Number: