Distribution characteristics of humeral head screws in treatment of proximal humeral fractures with proximal humerus internal locking system plate

doi:10.12307/2024.621

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus internal locking system locking plate is the most commonly used fixation method for proximal humeral fractures, but its failure rate is still high in clinical practice. Reasonable screw placement is an important factor affecting the stability of internal fixation.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the distribution of humeral head screws in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with proximal humerus internal locking system plate and its influence on internal fixation failure.
METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2021, data from patients with proximal humeral fractures undergoing proximal humerus internal locking system plate in Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 124 patients were enrolled, including 16 males and 108 females, at the age of ≥60 years. According to whether there was internal fixation failure after operation, they were divided into normal group (n=101) and internal fixation failure group (n=23). The patient’s age, gender, fracture type, the integrity of the medial column, plate height, neck-shaft angle, whether the talus screw was inserted, and the number of humeral head screws, were collected. The humeral head was divided into eight zones according to the postoperative digital radiography anteroposterior film, and the distribution characteristics of the screws in each zone were collected, and the heat map of the screw distribution was drawn.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender, fracture type, the integrity of the medial column, plate height, neck-shaft angle, whether to insert talus screws, and the number of humeral head screws (P > 0.05). (2) The heat map showed that the humeral head screws were evenly distributed in the normal group, mainly scattered in zones 4, 6, and 7. However, the screw distribution in the internal fixation failure group was not uniform, mainly concentrated in zones 4 and 6. In addition, in the ideal area of talus screws (7/8 zone), there were significantly more screws in the normal group than in the internal fixation failure group. (3) It is indicated that in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with proximal humerus internal locking system plate, the uniform distribution of humeral head screws is the key to ensuring the internal fixation effect. A reasonable distribution of humeral head screws helps to improve the treatment effect and the success rate of internal fixation.

Key words: proximal humerus fracture, proximal humerus internal locking system, locking plate, humeral head screw distribution, internal fixation failure

CLC Number:

Hu Liuchao, Luo Yiwen, Huang Jiewen, Lan Sibin, Wu Zhifang. Distribution characteristics of humeral head screws in treatment of proximal humeral fractures with proximal humerus internal locking system plate[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2024, 28(24): 3850-3854.

Figures/Tables 5

References

[1] PATEL AH, WILDER JH, OFA SA, et al. Trending a decade of proximal humerus fracture management in older adults. JSES Int. 2022;6(1):137-143.
[2] BAKER HP, GUTBROD J, STRELZOW JA, et al. Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adults-A Scoping Review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(20):6140.
[3] JAWA A, BURNIKEL D. Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev. 2016;4(1):e2.
[4] KAVURI V, BOWDEN B, KUMAR N, et al. Complications Associated with Locking Plate of Proximal Humerus Fractures. Indian J Orthop. 2018;52(2):108-116.
[5] LAUX CJ, GRUBHOFER F, WERNER C, et al. Current concepts in locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12(1):137.
[6] MARONGIU G, VERONA M, CARDONI G, et al. Synthetic Bone Substitutes and Mechanical Devices for the Augmentation of Osteoporotic Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies. J Funct Biomater. 2020;11(2):29.
[7] SUN Q, WU X, WANG L, et al. The plate fixation strategy of complex proximal humeral fractures. Int Orthop. 2020;44(9):1785-1795.
[8] 汪秋柯. 肱骨近端骨折分型与锁定钢板内固定术后继发性螺钉穿出的关系[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2019.
[9] LONGO UG, PETRILLO S, BERTON A, et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the management of fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg. 2016;100(2):83-91.
[10] LIEW AS, JOHNSON JA, PATTERSON SD, et al. Effect of screw placement on fixation in the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;9(5):423-426.
[11] TINGART MJ, LEHTINEN J, ZURAKOWSKI D, et al. Proximal humeral fractures: regional differences in bone mineral density of the humeral head affect the fixation strength of cancellous screws. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(5):620-624.
[12] ERHARDT JB, STOFFEL K, KAMPSHOFF J, et al. The position and number of screws influence screw perforation of the humeral head in modern locking plates: a cadaver study. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(10):e188-e192.
[13] GARDNER MJ, WEIL Y, BARKER JU, et al. The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(3): 185-191.
[14] 李波, 张世民, 胡孙君, 等. 肱骨头下皮质外距螺钉重建内侧柱稳定性的三维有限元分析[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2022,36(8):995-1002.
[15] MEHTA S, CHIN M, SANVILLE J, et al. Calcar screw position in proximal humerus fracture fixation: Don’t miss high. Injury. 2018,49(3):624-629.
[16] REN H, WU L, ZHANG X, et al. The effect of integrity of lesser tuberosity-medial calcar on postoperative outcome in the proximal humeral fracture. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):363.
[17] PONCE BA, THOMPSON KJ, RAGHAVA P, et al. The role of medial comminution and calcar restoration in varus collapse of proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(16):e111-e113.
[18] LEE SH, HAN SS, YOO BM, et al. Outcomes of locking plate fixation with fibular allograft augmentation for proximal humeral fractures in osteoporotic patients: comparison with locking plate fixation alone. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(3):260-265.
[19] GARDNER MJ, BORAIAH S, HELFET DL, et al. Indirect medial reduction and strut support of proximal humerus fractures using an endosteal implant. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(3):195-200.
[20] HE Y, ZHANG Y, WANG Y, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel dualplate fixation method for proximal humeral fractures without medial support. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12(1):72.
[21] PARK SG, KO Y. Medial Buttress Plating for Humerus Fractures With Unstable Medial Column. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(9):e352-e359.
[22] SOMASUNDARAM K, HUBER CP, BABU V, et al. Proximal humeral fractures: the role of calcium sulphate augmentation and extended deltoid splitting approach in internal fixation using locking plates. Injury. 2013;44(4):481-487.
[23] RODERER G, SCOLA A, SCHMOLZ W, et al. Biomechanical in vitro assessment of screw augmentation in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.Injury. 2013;44(10):1327-1332.
[24] 林浩东,傅慧超,吴晓明. 《2021版老年肱骨近端骨折治疗指南》解读[J]. 中华创伤杂志,2022,38(9):6.
[25] PADEGIMAS EM, ZMISTOWSKI B, LAWRENCE C, et al. Defining optimal calcar screw positioning in proximal humerus fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2017;26(11):1931-1937.
[26] 李波, 张世民, 胡孙君, 等. 肱骨头下皮质外距螺钉重建内侧柱稳定性的三维有限元分析[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2022,36(8):995-1002.
[27] ZHANG X, HUANG J, ZHAO L, et al. Inferomedial cortical bone contact and fixation with calcar screws on the dynamic and static mechanical stability of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):1.
[28] GALLAGHER B, SILVA MJ, RICCI WM. Effect of off-axis screw insertion, insertion torque, and plate contouring on locked screw strength. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(7):427-432.
[29] PADEGIMAS EM, CHANG G, NAMJOUYAN K, et al. Failure to restore the calcar and locking screw cross-threading predicts varus collapse in proximal humerus fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(2):291-295.
[30] OCKERT B, BRAUNSTEIN V, KIRCHHOFF C, et al. Monoaxial versus polyaxial screw insertion in angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures: radiographic analysis of a prospective randomized study. J Trauma. 2010;69(6): 1545-1551.
[31] FLETCHER J, WINDOLF M, RICHARDS RG, et al. Screw configuration in proximal humerus plating has a significant impact on fixation failure risk predicted by finite element models. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(9):1816-1823.
[32] ERHARDT JB, STOFFEL K, KAMPSHOFF J, et al. The position and number of screws influence screw perforation of the humeral head in modern locking plates: a cadaver study. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(10):e188-e192.
[33] LINDSAY C, HASTY E, CARPENTER D, et al. Proximal Humeral Locking Plates: A Cadaveric Study of 5 Versus 7 Metaphyseal Locking Screws. Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):306-311.
[34] BARVENCIK F, GEBAUER M, BEIL FT, et al. Age- and sex-related changes of humeral head microarchitecture: histomorphometric analysis of 60 human specimens. J Orthop Res. 2010;28(1):18-26.
[35] DONOHUE DM, SANTONI BG, STOOPS TK, et al. Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Inferiorly Directed Versus 3 Superiorly Directed Locking Screws on Stability in a 3-Part Proximal Humerus Fracture Model. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(6):306-312.
[36] CIRIC D, MISCHLER D, QAWASMI F, et al. Secondary Perforation Risk in Plate Osteosynthesis of Unstable Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Biomechanical Investigation of the Effect of Screw Length. J Orthop Res. 2019;37(12):2625-2633.
[37] FLETCHER J, WINDOLF M, GRUNWALD L, et al. The influence of screw length on predicted cut-out failures for proximal humeral fracture fixations predicted by finite element simulations. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019,139(8):1069-1074.
[38] SAUL D, HIMMELMANN T, DRESING K. Humeral Tip-apex-distance as a Prognostic Marker for Proximal Humeral Fractures in 203 Patients. Open Orthop J. 2017; 11:297-308.
[39] SPROSS C, JOST B, RAHM S, et al. How many radiographs are needed to detect angular stable head screw cut outs of the proximal humerus - a cadaver study. Injury. 2014;45(10):1557-1563.