BACKGROUND: Although there are many studies comparing different surgical approaches for the patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture who need a surgical treatment, there are no multi-center large-scale randomized controlled studies to reach a conclusion with high evidence level. This makes it necessary to do a meta-analysis with the existing studies to compare anterior and posterior approaches in treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the differences of anterior and posterior approaches for thoracolumbar burst fracture and provide guidance for the further operative treatments through a literature retrieval.
METHODS: An online retrieval of PubMed, Medline, Elsevier, Wanfang and CNKI databases was performed for articles about the anterior and posterior approaches for thoracolumbar burst fracture, with the key words of “thoracolumbar fracture, randomized controlled trial, spinal fracture, RCT, anterior and posterior” in English, and “thoracolumbar fracture, anterior, posterior, spine” in Chinese. We compared the operative time, total blood loss, loss of Cobb angle, improvement in Frankel grading, and loss of the vertebral height between the anterior and posterior surgical approaches.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Finally 18 randomized controlled trials with a total of 925 patients were included. There were 459 cases in anterior approach group and 466 cases in posterior approach group. The anterior approach cost 36.47 minutes longer than posterior approach and the blood loss in the anterior approach group was 432.58 mL more than the posterior approach group. Compared with the posterior approach group, the loss of Cobb angle was 3.41° lower, the improvement of Frankel grading was 0.33° higher, and the loss of vertebral height was 1.76 mm lower in the anterior approach group. There were significant differences in the operative time, total blood loss, loss of Cobb angle, improvement in Frankel grading and loss of vertebral height between the anterior and posterior surgical approaches (P < 0.01). Although the anterior approach has disadvantages such as long operative time, more intraoperative blood loss, and high technical requirement, the good short-term and long-term results make it worthwhile to apply for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.