Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2013, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (9): 1648-1654.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.09.019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Pillar implantation and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures

Yu Jin-he, Sun Xian-ze, Ren Liang, Liu Yan-bing, Gu Zhen-fang, Hou Shu-bing   

  1. Yu Jin-he, Sun Xian-ze, Ren Liang, Liu Yan-bing, Gu Zhen-fang, Hou Shu-bing
  • Received:2012-05-29 Revised:2012-09-10 Online:2013-02-26 Published:2013-02-26
  • Contact: Ren Liang, Doctor, Associate chief physician, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China Doctorren1973@163.com
  • About author:Yu Jin-he, Associate chief physician, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China yujinhe999@sina.com

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Pillar implantation and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty can overcome the drawbacks of “shell-like” vertebral after traditional posterior screw and rod system reset, make up the lack of traditional pedicle screw and rod system fixation, correct the deformity of the fractured vertebra with varying degrees, recover the carrying capacity and maintain the stability. But, which has the better efficacy has not been yet clear.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effects of Pillar implantation and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the elderly thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures.
METHODS: Pillar implantation was performed in 18 patients with elderly thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures, percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty was performed in 76 patients with elderly thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures. The operative time, blood loss, 24 hours visual analogue scale score, 7 days visual analogue scale score, anterior vertebral height and the Cobb angle were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Both Pillar implantation in 18 patients and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty in 76 patients were successed. The visual analogue scale score and Cobb angle after Pillar implantation were decreased, but the anterior vertebral height was increased significantly, and there was significant difference of anterior vertebral height when compared with that before implantation (P < 0.05). Compared with percutaneous kyphoplasty, the Pillar implantation showed longer operative time, more blood loss and higher 24 hours visual balloon analogue scale score, and the differences were significant (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in anterior vertebral height and 7 days visual analogue scale score between Pillar implantation group and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty group (P > 0.05). There was no adverse reaction after Pillar implantation, and cement leakage could be observed in percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty group and no neurosis could be observed. Pillar implantation and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of elderly thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures have the advantages of simple operation, shorter operative time and less blood loss, and it can improve the anterior vertebral height and relieve the pain, which is considered as the effective method for the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures.

Key words: bone and joint implants, basic experiment of bone injury, osteoporosis, pillar block, kyphoplasty, thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures, balloon dilatation, anterior vertebral height, vertebral height, pain, visual analog scale, Cobb angle

CLC Number: