Three-dimensional displacement and risk factors of midshaft clavicle fractures treated with titanium elastic intramedullary nailing

doi:10.12307/2026.516

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Titanium elastic intramedullary nailing for the treatment of significantly displaced midshaft clavicle fractures has the characteristics of minimally invasive and elastic fixation. The displacement of the fracture is closely related to the later function. However, there are few studies on the three-dimensional displacement analysis of the fracture ends before surgery and after intramedullary fixation such as titanium elastic intramedullary nailing.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the three-dimensional displacement of fracture ends after midshaft clavicle fracture and fixation with titanium elastic intramedullary nails, and to analyze the risk factors.
METHODS: A total of 91 patients with midshaft clavicle fracture (fracture end shortening ≥15 mm) admitted to Wendeng Orthopedic Hospital of Shandong Province from April 2019 to April 2024 were selected, including 57 males and 34 females, aged (51.73±10.21) years old. All patients received closed reduction and internal fixation with titanium elastic intramedullary nail. CT scans of the affected clavicle were performed before and on the first day after surgery. The CT data were imported into Mimics software for modeling. The length of the clavicle, lateral displacement of the fracture end, and rotation of the distal end of the fracture along the X, Y, and Z axes were measured and recorded before and after surgery. Pearson correlation coefficient was used for correlation analysis of various parameters, and generalized linear regression was used to evaluate risk factors.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Preoperatively, the variable that increased the risk of lateral displacement was the number of comminuted bone fragments, the variable that increased the risk of shortening displacement was male patients, and the variable that increased the risk of Z-axis rotation was the left limb. Shortening displacement was significantly positively correlated with lateral displacement (r=0.715, P < 0.001); shortening displacement was significantly positively correlated with X-axis rotation displacement and Y-axis rotation displacement (r=0.265, P=0.028; r=0.303, P=0.011); lateral displacement was significantly positively correlated with Y-axis rotation and Z-axis rotation (r=0.258, P=0.032; r=0.250, P=0.038); X-axis rotation was significantly positively correlated with Y-axis rotation (r=0.382, P=0.001), and Z-axis rotation was significantly positively correlated with Y-axis rotation (r=0.280, P=0.020). (2) Postoperatively: The number of scapula fractures and comminuted bone fragments were variables that increased the risk of postoperative shortening and lateral displacement: Preoperative X-, Y-, and Z-axis rotation displacements were risk variables that increased postoperative X-, Y-, and Z-axis rotation displacements, respectively. Postoperative lateral displacement was significantly positively correlated with postoperative shortening and displacement (r=0.584, P=0.000), and postoperative lateral displacement was also significantly positively correlated with postoperative Y axis rotation and Z axis rotation (r=0.360, P=0.002; r=0.250, P=0.038). Postoperative Y axis rotation was significantly positively correlated with postoperative Z axis rotation (r=0.248, P=0.040). (3) The results showed that the three-dimensional displacement of the clavicle end before and after surgery was affected by many factors, especially the number of comminuted bone fragments, scapula fractures, gender, and original rotation displacement. At the same time, there were complex correlations between various displacements, especially the correlation between shortening displacement and lateral displacement was the strongest.

Key words: midshaft clavicle fracture, titanium elastic intramedullary nail, three-dimensional displacement, risk factor, correlation analysis, engineered bone materials

CLC Number:

Zhang Junwei, Chen Lingling, Ma Zhenyuan, Nie Weizhi, Li Chaohui, Wang Haitao, Duan Laibao, Hou Jinyong, Bi Hongzheng. Three-dimensional displacement and risk factors of midshaft clavicle fractures treated with titanium elastic intramedullary nailing[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2026, 30(2): 269-277.

Figures/Tables 8

References

[1] HUNG LW, LU HY, CHANG CH, et al. Effects of Internal Fixation for Mid-Shaft Clavicle Fractures on Shoulder Kinematics During Humeral Elevations. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:710787.
[2] KIM JH, GWAK HC, KIM CW, et al. Three-dimensional clavicle displacement analysis and its effect on scapular position in acute clavicle midshaft fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(10): 1877-1885.
[3] WRIGHT M, DELLA ROCCA GJ. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline Summary on the Treatment of Clavicle Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023;31(18):977-983.
[4] PRADEL S, BRUNAUD M, COULOMB R, et al. Less than 1.5cm shortening in clavicle midshaft fracture has long-term functional impact. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023;109(5):103590.
[5] LEE GB, KIM H, JEON IH, et al. Long-term outcomes of initially conservatively treated midshaft clavicle fractures. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021;24(1):9-14.
[6] JUBEL A, KNOPF M, JUBEL JM, et al. Clavicle nonunion. Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2024;127(11):776-782.
[7] VON RüDEN C, REHME-RÖHRL J, AUGAT P, et al. Evidence on treatment of clavicle fractures. Injury. 2023;54:110818.
[8] NICHOLSON JA, MAKARAM N, SIMPSON A, et al. Fracture nonunion in long bones: A literature review of risk factors and surgical management. Injury. 2021;52 Suppl 2:S3-S11.
[9] JERAY KJ, BRODERICK JS, MULLIS BH, et al. Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study of Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for High-Energy Midshaft Clavicle Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2024; 38(7):345-350.
[10] TRIVELLAS M, WITTSTEIN J. Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: When Is Surgical Management Indicated and Which Fixation Method Should Be Used? Clin Sports Med. 2023;42(4):633-647.
[11] QVIST AH, JENSEN SL. Minimal early functional gains after operative treatment of midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials including 1333 patients. JSES Int. 2024; 8(3):400-406.
[12] BIZ C, POZZUOLI A, BELLUZZI E, et al. An Institutional Standardised Protocol for the Treatment of Acute Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures (ADMCFs): Conservative or Surgical Management for Active Patients? Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(13):1883.
[13] KUMAR AV, RAMACHANDRA KAMATH K, SALIAN PRV, et al. Operative stabilisation versus non-operative management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Sicot J. 2022;8:45.
[14] RING D, HOLOVACS T. Brachial plexus palsy after intramedullary fixation of a clavicular fracture. A report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(8):1834-1837.
[15] Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(1):1-10.
[16] ASSOBHI JE. Reconstruction plate versus minimal invasive retrograde titanium elastic nail fixation for displaced midclavicular fractures. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011;12(4):185-192.
[17] DONNELLY TD, MACFARLANE RJ, NAGY MT, et al. Fractures of the clavicle: an overview. Open Orthop J. 2013;7:329-233.
[18] DHODAPKAR MM, MODRAK M, HALPERIN SJ, et al. Trends in and Factors Associated With Surgical Management for Closed Clavicle Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023;7(12):e23.00226.
[19] ANNICCHIARICO N, LATTA A, SANTOLINI E. Plate osteosynthesis for mid-shaft clavicle fractures: An update. Injury. 2023;54 Suppl 1:S53-S57.
[20] LU M, QIU H, LIU Y, et al. Intramedullary fixation versus plate fixation in the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Surg. 2023;10:1194050.
[21] HAGAN D, BURNETT A, PAZIK M, et al. Outcomes of young active patients with displaced clavicle fractures treated with Rockwood pin. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023;33(7):3037-3042.
[22] KUNKLE BF, DESJARDINS JD, CAMPBELL JR, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of an intramedullary clavicle screw in simple oblique and butterfly wedge fractures. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2021;235(11): 1257-1264.
[23] BENTS RT, BENTS EJ. Intramedullary Screw Fixation for Midshaft Clavicle Fractures. Arthrosc Tech. 2024;13(3):102884.
[24] HOOGERVORST P, VAN DAM T, VERDONSCHOT N, et al. Functional outcomes and complications of intramedullary fixation devices for Midshaft clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):395.
[25] YADAV S, PHALAK MO, SHEVATE I, et al. Comparative Study of Postoperative Outcomes of Clavicle Midshaft Fracture Treated by Nailing vs. Plating. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e22862.
[26] WIJDICKS FJ, HOUWERT M, DIJKGRAAF M, et al. Complications after plate fixation and elastic stable intramedullary nailing of dislocated midshaft clavicle fractures: a retrospective comparison. Int Orthop. 2012;36(10):2139-2145.
[27] BRAUN KF, SIEBENLIST S, SANDMANN GH, et al. Functional results following titanium elastic-stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) of mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014;81(2): 118-121.
[28] NARSARIA N, SINGH AK, ARUN GR, et al. Surgical fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: elastic intramedullary nailing versus precontoured plating. J Orthop Traumatol. 2014;15(3):165-171.
[29] OMID R, KIDD C, YI A, et al. Measurement of Clavicle Fracture Shortening Using Computed Tomography and Chest Radiography. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016;8(4):367-372.
[30] HOOGERVORST P, CHOPRA A, WORKING ZM, et al. Measurement of midshaft clavicle vertical displacement is not influenced by radiographic projection. JSES Int. 2020;4(2):251-255.
[31] STEGEMAN SA, DE WITTE PB, BOONSTRA S, et al. Measurement of clavicular length and shortening after a midshaft clavicular fracture: Spatial digitization versus planar roentgen photogrammetry. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2016;29:74-80.
[32] LIMA GV, LA BANCA V, MURACHOVSKY J, et al. Assessment of the measurement methods in midshaft clavicle fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):992.
[33] CHAO YH, CHOU YC, LIN CL. The deformities of acute diaphyseal clavicular fractures: a three-dimensional analysis. Biomed Eng Online. 2023;22(1):42.
[34] ÖZTüRK M, PAULIN E, CHARBONNIER C, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction and virtual reposition of fragments compared to two dimensional measurements of midshaft clavicle fracture shortening. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):216.
[35] OKI S, MATSUMURA N, KIRIYAMA Y, et al. Three-Dimensional Deformities of Nonoperative Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Surface Matching Analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(11): e385-e389.
[36] HILLEN RJ, BOLSTERLEE B, VEEGER D. The biomechanical effect of clavicular shortening on shoulder muscle function, a simulation study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2016;37:141-146.
[37] SU WR, CHEN WL, CHEN RH, et al. Evaluation of three-dimensional scapular kinematics and shoulder function in patients with short malunion of clavicle fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2016;21(6):739-744.
[38] HUNG LW, LU HY, CHEN TY, et al. Residual kinematic deviations of the shoulder during humeral elevation after conservative treatment for mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12:1413679.
[39] LEDGER M, LEEKS N, ACKLAND T, et al. Short malunions of the clavicle: an anatomic and functional study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(4): 349-354.
[40] KIM D, LEE D, JANG Y, et al. Effects of short malunion of the clavicle on in vivo scapular kinematics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(9): e286-e292.
[41] RISTEVSKI B, HALL JA, PEARCE D, et al. The radiographic quantification of scapular malalignment after malunion of displaced clavicular shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(2):240-246.
[42] BIZ C, SCUCCHIARI D, POZZUOLI A, et al. Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures with Figure-of-Eight Bandage: The Impact of Residual Shortening on Shoulder Function. J Pers Med. 2022;12(5):759.
[43] TAGLIAPIETRA J, BELLUZZI E, BIZ C, et al. Midshaft Clavicle Fractures Treated Nonoperatively Using Figure-of-Eight Bandage: Are Fracture Type, Shortening, and Displacement Radiographic Predictors of Failure? Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(10):788.
[44] ANDERMAHR J, JUBEL A, ELSNER A, et al. Malunion of the clavicle causes significant glenoid malposition: a quantitative anatomic investigation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006;28(5):447-456.
[45] HOOGERVORST P, APPALSAMY A, FRANKEN S, et al. Quantifying shortening of the fractured clavicle assuming clavicular symmetry is unreliable. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;138(6):803-807.
[46] RIBAS GGO, DAU L, GONçALVES FF, et al. Measurement of Clavicular Symmetry in Healthy Subjects Using Tomographic Database of Public Hospitals. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2023;58(4):e617-e624.
[47] ERGIŞI Y, ÖZDEMIR E, TıKMAN M, et al. Revisiting the surgical indication of mid-shaft clavicle fractures: Clavicle asymmetry. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023;34(1):63-68.
[48] HERMAN A, WHITESELL R, STEWART RL, et al. The impact of upright radiographs of midshaft clavicle fractures on treatment recommendations. Acta Orthop Belg. 2019;85(3):289-296.
[49] BACKUS JD, MERRIMAN DJ, MCANDREW CM, et al. Upright versus supine radiographs of clavicle fractures: does positioning matter? J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(11):636-641.