Application values of glass fiber post and cast metal post in the repair of dental defects

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.47.018

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that fiber post is superior to cast metal post in the restoration of large-area dental defects, in prognostic terms of post and core crown off, post and core breakage, root fracture.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the application value of glass fiber post and cast metal post in restoration of tooth defects.
METHODS: Totally 100 patients with dental defects (150 teeth; 51 males and 48 females) were selected and randomly divided into observation group (50 cases, 70 teeth) and control group (50 cases, 80 teeth). All of the patients were treated with glass fiber post and metal post repair. After repair, all the patients were followed up for 1-3 years. The repair effect of the two groups were observed and compared in terms of integrity, color matching, marginal fit, periodontal pocket depth, alkaline phosphatase activity and post and core crown damage.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: After 1 year of repair, the observation group was better than the control group in aspects of marginal fit and color matching (P < 0.05); after 1-3 years, the alkaline phosphatase activity was significantly lower in the observation group than the control group (P < 0.05), and there was no difference in the periodontal probing depth between the two groups; while the observation group exhibited higher successful rate than the control group (P < 0.05). The results show that compared with the cast metal post, glass fiber post is better for restoration of tooth defects, exhibiting better restoration effect and long-term success rate, which is conducive to the maintenance of periodontal health.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：生物材料；骨生物材料; 口腔生物材料; 纳米材料; 缓释材料; 材料相容性；组织工程

全文链接：

Key words: tooth preparation, prosthodontic, post and core technique, dental prosthesis

CLC Number:

R318

Huang Ju. Application values of glass fiber post and cast metal post in the repair of dental defects[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2014, 18(47): 7643-7647.

Figures/Tables 1

References

[1] 常志明.玻璃纤维桩与金属桩核修复牙体缺损的比较[J].中国组织工程研究,2013,17(29):5309-5315.
[2] 姜雅萍,张海英,李恬,等.多根管纤维桩联合氧化锆全瓷冠修复老年人磨牙大面积缺损的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志, 2013,33(10): 2366-2368.
[3] 田静,唐旭炎.纤维桩系统在切牙残冠、残根修复中的应用效果[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2013,38(11):1425-1427,1430.
[4] 张红霞.玻璃纤维桩与铸造金属桩在前牙修复中的临床效果观察[J].感染、炎症、修复,2013,14(4):227,238.
[5] 王敬娈,尚文静,张淑华,等.铸造金属桩与纤维桩在前牙残根残冠修复中的疗效观察[J].中国美容医学,2012,21(12):12.
[6] Feng D, Qi D, Lin X,et al. Effects of different tooth preparations on the fracture behavior of teeth with severe wedge-shaped defect restored with post and core crowns. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi.2014;32(2):157-161.
[7] Joiner A, Schäfer F, Naeeni MM,et al. Remineralisation effect of a dual-phase calcium silicate/phosphate gel combined with calcium silicate/phosphate toothpaste on acid-challenged enamel in situ.J Dent.2014;42 Suppl 1:S53-59.
[8] 苏丽英,王松梅.纤维桩核与铸造金属桩核修复上颌前牙残冠残根疗效对比分析[J].武警后勤学院学报:医学版, 2013,22(4): 296-297.
[9] 周丽华,何赐丁,陈蕾,等.石英纤维桩与二氧化锆全瓷冠修复前牙缺损的临床研究[J].中国美容医学,2013,22(1):187-189.
[10] 李慧,崔广,伍小臻,等.不同材质桩核冠在前牙美学区修复的临床研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2013,(22):9980-9983.
[11] 毛莹莹,刘淼,姚贵良,等.后牙纤维桩桩核冠修复的临床应用研究[J].中国美容医学,2014,23(3):234-236.
[12] Gbadebo OS, Ajayi DM, Oyekunle OO,et al. Randomized clinical study comparing metallic and glass fiber post in restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Indian J Dent Res. 2014;25(1):58-63.
[13] 汪卓妍,束皓.玻璃纤维桩在牙体缺损修复中疗效观察[J].中国血液流变学杂志,2013,23(2):296-297,303.
[14] 邹红.玻璃纤维桩联合全瓷冠修复前牙牙体缺损的效果评价[J].海南医学,2013,24(6):829-831.
[15] 步中琦,张远捷,姜东锋,等.纤维桩修复牙体缺损的临床应用[J].浙江临床医学,2013,15(11):1660-1661.
[16] Gbadebo SO, Ajayi DM, Abiodun-Solanke IM,et al.Survival of glass fiber post retained endodontically treated teeth preliminary report.Afr J Med Med Sci. 2013;42(3):265-269.
[17] Lazari PC,Oliveira RC,Anchieta RB,et al.Stress distribution on dentin-cement-post interface varying root canal and glass fiber post diameters. A three-dimensional finite element analysis based on micro-CT data. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(6):511-517.
[18] Ambica K,Mahendran K,Talwar S,et al.Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with carbon fiber posts, glass fiber posts, and an experimental dentin post system: an in vitro study.J Endod.2013;39(1):96-100.
[19] 张衍军.编织排龈线在牙体修复中的应用[J].中国组织工程研究, 2013,17(25):4721-4726.
[20] 徐可卿,关平,刘俊,等.金合金嵌体在磨牙牙体缺损修复中的临床应用[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2014,15(1):30-31.
[21] 王建鸿,王丽萍,廖岚,等.一体化氧化锆嵌体修复后牙牙体缺损2年临床疗效观察[J].北京口腔医学,2014,22(1):46-48.
[22] 常志明,王永功.不同铸造金属桩与纤维桩在前牙牙体缺损修复中应用[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2013,27(6):607-609.
[23] 林立垚,钭敏芝,周红梅,等.玻璃纤维桩树脂核和金属铸造桩核修复上颌前牙残根残冠的效果评价[J].中国医药导报, 2014,11(9): 54-56,61.
[24] 孟贺,孙萌,张文茹,等.不同材料嵌体修复后牙邻(牙合)面牙体缺损的临床观察[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2014,24(3):162-165.
[25] 杨娟,刘养杰.玻璃纤维桩在前牙桩冠修复中的应用体会[J].中国美容医学,2014,23(12):1001-1002.
[26] 马洪学,申丽丽,刘琨,等.玻璃纤维桩核与铸造金属桩核修复残根残冠及无桩修复牙体的临床效果评价[J].华西口腔医学杂志, 2013, 31(1):45-48.
[27] 贺乃玲,曹秀华,田英利,等.玻璃纤维桩与铸造金属桩在残根残冠修复中的临床比较[J].山西医药杂志,2014,58(7):800-801.
[28] 王月平.玻璃纤维桩树脂核和金属铸造桩核在上颌前牙残根残冠修复中的对比分析[J].中国美容医学,2013,22(11): 1204-1207.
[29] 果立新.纤维桩与铸造金属桩核在修复大面积牙体缺损的临床疗效比较[J].中国医药导刊,2014,16(4):562-562,564.
[30] 吴国麟.玻璃纤维桩核和铸造金属桩核在残根残冠保存修复中的临床对比研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2014,13(3):206-208.