Accuracy of modified implant template of assisted implantation in missing second molars

doi:10.12307/2025.220

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted implant surgery can improve implantation accuracy, but the use of implant template in the posterior tooth area is limited for patients with small opening and small interocclusal distance. Therefore, the digital guide has been improved.
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of modified implant template on the accuracy of assisted implantation in missing second molars.
METHODS: From July 2020 to July 2023, 40 patients who received digital guide plate implantation or free hand implantation to repair missing second molars were selected from First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. According to the coin toss method, patients were randomly divided into a trial group (n=22; modified digital guide assisted implantation) and a control group (n=18; free hand implantation). The data of neck deviation, tip deviation, depth deviation, and angle deviation were compared between groups for preoperative and postoperative cone beam CT overlap analysis. One week after the operation, the patients’ satisfaction with the operation was assessed by visual analog scale score.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The trial group included 25 implants (12 in the upper jaw and 13 in the lower jaw); the control group included 23 implants (8 in the upper jaw and 15 in the lower jaw). The neck deviation, tip deviation, depth deviation, and angle deviation of the trial group were all smaller than those of the control group (P < 0.05, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in accuracy between the maxillary and mandibular implant site in the trial group
(P > 0.05). (2) There was no significant difference in satisfaction with the operation between the two groups (P > 0.05). (3) The results showed that improving the digital guide plate for assisted implantation for missing second molar can improve surgical accuracy and is suitable for patients with small opening and small interocclusal distance in the posterior tooth area.

Key words: implant accuracy, modified implant template, missing second molar, interocclusal distance, dental implant

CLC Number:

Zhang Yuhang, Zeng Yuning, Zeng Jindi, Lu Yixuan, Ye Hui, Ji Jianxin. Accuracy of modified implant template of assisted implantation in missing second molars[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2025, 29(4): 738-744.

Figures/Tables 4

References

[1] RAWAL S. Guided innovations: Robot-assisted dental implant surgery. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127(5):673-674.
[2] POMARES-PUIG C, SÁNCHEZ-GARCÉS MA, JORBA-GARCÍA A. Dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery for completely edentulous patients. A proof of a concept. J Dent. 2023;130:104443.
[3] CHACKARTCHI T, ROMANOS GE, PARKANYI L, et al. Reducing errors in guided implant surgery to optimize treatment outcomes. Periodontol 2000. 2022;88(1):64-72.
[4] KUNAKORNSAWAT W, SERICHETAPHONGSE P, ARUNJAROENSUK S, et al.
Training of novice surgeons using dynamic computer assisted dental implant surgery: An exploratory randomized trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023;25(3):511-518.
[5] TAHMASEB A, WU V, WISMEIJER D, et al. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(16):416-435.
[6] SOMOGYI-GANSS E, HOLMES HI, JOKSTAD A. Accuracy of a novel prototype dynamic computer-assisted surgery system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(8):882-890.
[7] ASHY LM. Restoration-type Outcome of Freehand Implant Placement in Single Edentulous Gaps: An Observational Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20(11):1274-1278.
[8] JAEMSUWAN S, ARUNJAROENSUK S, KABOOSAYA B, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position among freehand implant placement, static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: a non-randomized prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;52(2):264-271.
[9] HUANG L, LIU L, YANG S, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using implant positional guide versus freehand: a prospective clinical study. Int J Implant Dent. 2023;9(1):45.
[10] SCHERER U, STOETZER M, RUECKER M, et al. Template-guided vs. non-guided drilling in site preparation of dental implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(6):1339-1346.
[11] POMARES-PUIG C, SÁNCHEZ-GARCÉS MA, JORBA-GARCÍA A. Dynamic and static computer-guided surgery using the double-factor technique for completely edentulous patients: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(5):852-857.
[12] STÜNKEL R, ZELLER AN, BOHNE T, et al. Accuracy of intraoral real-time navigation versus static, CAD/CAM-manufactured pilot drilling guides in dental implant surgery: an in vitro study. Int J Implant Dent. 2022;8(1):41.
[13] 陈婷.种植外科导板临床应用及改良的研究进展[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版),2019,13(6):376-380.
[14] 林周兴,高跃,张晓蕾,等.自主式口腔种植机器人模型实验的精度分析[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2023,39(4):426-432.
[15] PIMKHAOKHAM A, JIARANUCHART S, KABOOSAYA B, et al. Can computer-assisted implant surgery improve clinical outcomes and reduce the frequency and intensity of complications in implant dentistry? A critical review. Periodontol 2000. 2022;90(1):197-223.
[16] 张思慧,陈威夷,蔡琴,等.比较全程引导与半程引导机器人技术对无牙颌种植精度的影响[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2023,28(4): 229-232.
[17] 陈江,宿玉成,沈国芳,等.口腔种植机器人临床应用的专家共识(第一版)[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2023,28(3):134-139.
[18] JORBA-GARCÍA A, GONZÁLEZ-BARNADAS A, CAMPS-FONT O, et al.
Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(5): 2479-2494.
[19] 满毅,杨幕童.种植机器人、动态导航及全程导板在口腔种植领域的临床应用进展[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2023,28(3):146-151.
[20] ROMANDINI M, RUALES-CARRERA E, SADILINA S, et al. Minimal invasiveness at dental implant placement: A systematic review with meta-analyses on flapless fully guided surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2023;91(1):89-112.
[21] PESSOA R, SIQUEIRA R, LI J, et al. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(2):155-164.
[22] YU X, TAO B, WANG F, et al. Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years. J Dent. 2023;135:104567.
[23] YOTPIBULWONG T, ARUNJAROENSUK S, KABOOSAYA B, et al. Accuracy of implant placement with a combined use of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34(4):330-341.
[24] BARRAK IÁ, VARGA E, PIFFKO J. Navigation in implantology: Accuracy assessment regarding the literature. Fogorv Sz. 2016;109(2):61-68.
[25] 骆泯润,白雪莹,祝雨茜,等.无牙颌金属种植导板精度分析的病例系列[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2023,28(4):223-228.
[26] GOLDSTEIN G, GOODACRE C, MACGREGOR K. Occlusal Vertical Dimension: Best Evidence Consensus Statement. J Prosthodont. 2021; 30(S1):12-19.
[27] 刘晨曦,董静博,吕鹏军,等.动态导航与静态导板对种植手术精确度影响的Meta分析[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2022,23(3):183-189.
[28] 陈思,周子谦,柳慧芬,等.动态导航技术对口腔种植精准度影响的Meta分析[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2022,15(5):579-584+589.
[29] AGHALOO T, HADAYA D, SCHOENBAUM TR, et al. Guided and Navigation Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023;38(suppl):7-15.
[30] GARGALLO-ALBIOL J, BAROOTCHI S, MARQUÉS-GUASCH J, et al. Fully Guided Versus Half-Guided and Freehand Implant Placement: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(6):1159-1169.
[31] TATTAN M, CHAMBRONE L, GONZÁLEZ-MARTÍN O, et al. Static computer-aided, partially guided, and free-handed implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(10):889-916.
[32] Poli PP, Muktadar AK, Souza FÁ, et al. Computer-guided implant placement associated with computer-aided bone regeneration in the treatment of atrophied partially edentulous alveolar ridges: A proof-of-concept study. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(1):333-341.
[33] 苏天月,赵金荣,滕微微,等.自由手、种植外科导板、口腔种植机器人种植精度对比的体外研究[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2023, 28(4):244-249.
[34] MAI HN, DAM VV, LEE DH. Accuracy of Augmented Reality-Assisted Navigation in Dental Implant Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:42040.
[35] TURBUSH SK, TURKYILMAZ I. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;108(3):181-188.
[36] BENCHARIT S, STAFFEN A, YEUNG M, et al. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(7):1431-1439.
[37] EL KHOLY K, JANNER SFM, SCHIMMEL M, et al. The influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and drilling key length on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(1):101-107.
[38] WEI SM, ZHU Y, WEI JX, et al. Accuracy of dynamic navigation in implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(4):383-393.
[39] PETTERSSON A, KOMIYAMA A, HULTIN M, et al. Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(4):527-537.
[40] CHEN Y, ZHANG X, WANG M, et al. Accuracy of Full-Guided and Half-Guided Surgical Templates in Anterior Immediate and Delayed Implantation: A Retrospective Study. Materials (Basel). 2020;14(1):26.
[41] FÜRHAUSER R, MAILATH-POKORNY G, HAAS R, et al. Esthetics of Flapless Single-Tooth Implants in the Anterior Maxilla Using Guided Surgery: Association of Three-Dimensional Accuracy and Pink Esthetic Score. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17 Suppl 2: e427-e433.
[42] TALLARICO M, KIM YJ, COCCHI F, et al. Accuracy of newly developed sleeve-designed templates for insertion of dental implants: A prospective multicenters clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(1):108-113.
[43] VINCI R, MANACORDA M, ABUNDO R, et al. Accuracy of Edentulous Computer-Aided Implant Surgery as Compared to Virtual Planning: A Retrospective Multicenter Study. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):774.
[44] ARISAN V, KARABUDA ZC, OZDEMIR T. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. J Periodontol. 2010;81(1):43-51.
[45] LIN CC, ISHIKAWA M, MAIDA T, et al. Stereolithographic Surgical Guide with a Combination of Tooth and Bone Support: Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery in Distal Extension Situation. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):709.
[46] KÜHL S, ZÜRCHER S, MAHID T, et al. Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(7):763-769.
[47] BOVER-RAMOS F, VIÑA-ALMUNIA J, CERVERA-BALLESTER J, et al. Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(1):101-115.