Comparison of motion range of cervical spine after two cervical manipulations based on motion capture technique

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.3864

Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2021, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (21): 3281-3285.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.3864

Comparison of motion range of cervical spine after two cervical manipulations based on motion capture technique

Lin Dongxin1, Huang Xuecheng2, Qin Qingguang3, Yang Yang1, Deng Yuping1, Tan Jinchuan1, Wang Mian1, Su Weiwei4, Huang Tao1, Huang Wenhua1, 4, 5

1Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China; 2Shenzhen Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Futian), Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong Province, China

Received:2020-08-18 Revised:2020-08-21 Accepted:2020-09-26 Online:2021-07-28 Published:2021-01-21
Contact: Huang Wenhua, Professor, Doctoral supervisor, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China; Guangdong Medical Innovation Platform for Translation of 3D Printing Application, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China; Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong Province, China
About author:Lin Dongxin, Master candidate, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China
Supported by:
the Foundation for Basic and Applied Basic Research of Guangdong Province, No. 2020A1515010998 (to HXC); the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province, No. 2016B090917001 (to HWH); the High-Level Medical Team of “Three-Famous Project” in Shenzhen medical and health, No. SZSM201612019 (to HWH); the Promoting Innovation Driven Project of Shenzhen, No. 2019012 (to HWH)

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Cervical rotation manipulation has a positive effect on the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, but improper use of manipulation can easily cause adverse consequences. By comparing the inclined pull manipulation and rotation-traction manipulation that are commonly used in clinical practice and have a set of standard operating procedures, it provides clinical safety guidance for the manipulation.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the difference in range of motion of cervical spine in the inclined pull manipulation and rotation-traction manipulation by motion capture technology, and to investigate the movement characteristics and the safety of two kinds of manipulations.
METHODS: Totally 20 healthy subjects (10 males and 10 females) were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The 10 subjects (5 males and 5 females) in each group were subjected to inclined pull manipulation (group 1) and rotation-traction manipulation (group 2), respectively, to measure the active and passive movements of cervical spine and the range of motion of the subphysiological areas. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shunde Hospital Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical University.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The active and passive ranges of motion of the group of inclined pull method and the group of rotation-traction manipulation were not significantly different (P > 0.05). The range of motion in the subphysiological region of the group of inclined pull method was larger than that in the group of rotation-traction manipulation; the range of motion in the left subphysiological region was larger than that in the right region in the group of inclined pull method (P < 0.05). However, the range of motion in the subphysiological region was similar between both sexes (P > 0.05). The range of motion in the subphysiological region was similar between the left and right sides between both sexes in the group of rotation-traction manipulation (P > 0.05). It is concluded that the subphysiological area of cervical rotation-traction manipulation is smaller than that of inclined pull method, and the technique is more stable and balanced.

Key words: motion capture, inclined pull method, rotation-traction manipulation, active movement, passive motion, subphysiological area, rotation technique, cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, pulling range

CLC Number:

Lin Dongxin, Huang Xuecheng, Qin Qingguang, Yang Yang, Deng Yuping, Tan Jinchuan, Wang Mian, Su Weiwei, Huang Tao, Huang Wenhua. Comparison of motion range of cervical spine after two cervical manipulations based on motion capture technique[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(21): 3281-3285.

Figures/Tables 4

References

[1] LV Y, TIAN W, CHEN D, et al. The prevalence and associated factors of symptomatic cervical Spondylosis in Chinese adults: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):325.
[2] WANG C, TIAN F, ZHOU Y, et al. The incidence of cervical spondylosis decreases with aging in the elderly, and increases with aging in the young and adult population: a hospital-based clinical analysis. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:47-53.
[3] 柯尊华,王静怡.颈椎病流行病学及发病机理研究进展[J].颈腰痛杂志,2014,35(1):62-64.
[4] 章薇,李金香,娄必丹,等.中医康复临床实践指南·项痹（颈椎病）[J].康复学报,2020,30(5):337-342.
[5] 陈威烨,章柯杰,张聪,等.神经根型颈椎病保守疗法的指南回顾[J].中国乡村医药,2020,27(19):74-76.
[6] 岳寿伟,魏慧,邵山.颈椎病评估与康复治疗进展[J].中国康复医学杂志,2019,34(11):1273-1277.
[7] 崔立军,鲍勇,陈昕,等.中国康复临床实践指南的质量评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2019,19(6):723-728.
[8] 杨珂.颈椎病的络病病机与临证治则辨析[J].光明中医,2017,32(16): 2310-2311.
[9] 邢丹,王斌,侯云飞,等.中国骨科临床实践指南的质量评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2017,17(3):347-356.
[10] 邓真,沈知彼,詹红生,等.石氏定位旋扳法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(5):5-9.
[11] 陈黎明,许根荣,郭盛君,等.仰卧定点复位法治疗神经根型颈椎病中手法发力方向对疗效的影响[J].中华中医药杂志,2020,35(4): 2189-2192.
[12] HUANG X, YE L, WU Z, et al. Biomechanical Effects of Lateral Bending Position on Performing Cervical Spinal Manipulation for Cervical Disc Herniation: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018;2018:2798396.
[13] 黄学成,叶林强,江晓兵,等.不同体位下颈椎旋转手法对颈椎间盘位移和内在应力的影响[J].中国康复理论与实践,2017,23(12): 1470-1475.
[14] ZHOU ZL, SU GH, ZHENG BZ, et al. Randomized controlled trials of needle knife therapy combined with rotation traction manipulation for the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016;29(9):820-824.
[15] JOHN S, TAVEE J. Bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis due to cervical chiropractic manipulation. Neurologist. 2015;19(3):65-67.
[16] TURNER RC, LUCKE-WOLD BP, BOO S, et al. The potential dangers of neck manipulation & risk for dissection and devastating stroke: An illustrative case & review of the literature. Biomed Res Rev. 2018;2(1):10.15761/BRR.1000110.
[17] HUANG Y, LI S, FENG M, et al. Cervical Spine Mechanism for Reproduction of the Biomechanical Behaviours of the Human Neck during Rotation-Traction Manipulation. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2017; 2017:5829048.
[18] 梅凌,李义凯,付小勇,等.颈椎旋转手法的亚生理区范围及临床意义[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2009,17(12):8-10.
[19] 姚斌彬,阿蓉,于天源.于天源教授治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床经验[J].中华中医药杂志,2012,27(4):1160-1163.
[20] 朱立国,冯敏山,毕方杉,等.颈椎旋转(提)手法的在体力学测量[J].中国康复医学杂志,2007(8):673-676.
[21] BURKE M, LASENBY J. Estimating missing marker positions using low dimensional Kalman smoothing. J Biomech. 2016;49(9):1854-1858.
[22] 冯敏山,朱立国,魏戌,等.颈椎旋提手法操作轨迹的动态捕捉研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2011,26(2):176-177.
[23] 李远栋,王平,李嘉钰,等.基于动态捕捉技术定点侧屈旋扳整颈手法在体运动学研究[J].辽宁中医杂志,2019,46(12):2565-2567, 2687.
[24] 李建国,王平,李嘉钰,等.运动捕捉摇拔戳手法治疗踝扭伤运动轨迹相关问题研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2018,26(9):19-22,27.
[25] 冼思彤,于天源,刘卉,等.颈椎侧扳法操作轨迹的动力学和运动学分析[J].中华中医药学刊,2015,33(4):850-852.
[26] LIGUO Z, MINSHAN F, XUNLU Y, et al. Kinematics Analysis of Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation Measured by a Motion Capture System. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017:5293916.
[27] NGAN JM, CHOW DH, HOLMES AD. The kinematics and intra- and inter-therapist consistencies of lower cervical rotational manipulation. Med Eng Phys. 2005;27(5):395-401.
[28] LI YK, ZHU QA, ZHONG SZ. The effect of cervical traction combined with rotatory manipulation on cervical nucleus pulposus pressures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21(2):97-100.
[29] VERES SP, ROBERTSON PA, BROOM ND. The influence of torsion on disc herniation when combined with flexion. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(9): 1468-1478.
[30] SCHMIDT H, KETTLER A, HEUER F, et al. Intradiscal pressure, shear strain, and fiber strain in the intervertebral disc under combined loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(7):748-755.
[31] 江永桂.理筋手法联合下颈段抗阻运动训练治疗颈型颈椎病临床观察[J].河北中医,2019,41(10):1555-1558.
[32] 蔡俊燕,王司晔.牵引联合Mulligan手法治疗青年颈型颈椎病效果观察[J].交通医学,2016,30(4):330-332.
[33] 王琼,朱国苗.手法治疗颈型颈椎病临床疗效和安全性系统评价[J].中华中医药杂志,2014,29(12):3716-3723.
[34] 王凤林.硬膜外阻滞联合颈椎手法整复治疗颈椎间盘突出症的临床研究[J].实用医技杂志,2013,20(9):1000-1001.
[35] PEOLSSON A, ALMKVIST C, DAHLBERG C, et al. Age- and sex-specific reference values of a test of neck muscle endurance. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007;30(3):171-177.

Comparison of motion range of cervical spine after two cervical manipulations based on motion capture technique

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Zhang Haifeng, Zhao Can, Liu Meixiao, Song Cuirong, Pang Yin. Analysis of various degrees of freedom of the hip movement based on motion capture technology [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(12): 1815-1819.
[2]	Zhang Hui, Liu Biquan, Li Hong, Liu Jingjun, Gan Yuyun, Li Lunlan, Yin Zongsheng. Self-control versus continuous passive motion exercise following primary total knee arthroplasty [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2019, 23(20): 3130-3135.