Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2010, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (47): 8831-8834.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2010.47.022

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Biodegradation of polycarbonate polyurethane

Tuo Xin-lin1, Xia Wei-juan1, Cheng Xiao-fei2, Wu Ji-gong2, Zou De-wei2   

  1. 1 Institute of Polymer Science, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing   100084, China; 2 The 306 Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing   100101, China
  • Online:2010-11-19 Published:2010-11-19
  • About author:Tuo Xin-lin☆, Doctor, Institute of Polymer Science, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China tuoxl@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
  • Supported by:

    the National High-tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Program), No.2006AA02Z4D4*

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Different polyurethanes vary in biostability. Study on the biostability of polycarbonate polyurethane (PCU) is important to determine the feasibility of polyurethane used as the external capsule of prosthetic disc nucleus pulposus. 
OBJECTIVE: To observe the in vitro and in vivo degradation properties of polyether polyurethane (PEU) and PCU with different hard segment contents.
METHODS: The in vitro hydrolysis, oxidative degradation and enzymolysis experiments of the polyurethane were performed in simulated environment. The prepared PEU and PCU samples were dipped into PBS and “H2O2/CoCl2 preoxidation-Papain” systems for in vitro degradation study at 37 ℃, and implanted into the back muscle of white rabbits for in vivo degradation experiment.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The degradation of PCU is greatly better than PEU, with larger hard segment contents and stronger degradation resistance. PCU is much more biostable than PEU, it’s more suitable for long-time biological implantation.

CLC Number: