Influence of NIC X-FILE and DENCO Pre-Shaper nickel-titanium instruments on the shaping of simulated curved canals

doi:10.12307/2023.886

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Root canal preparation is a key step in root canal therapy. In recent years, with the rapid development of new nickel-titanium instruments, the results of root canal shaping ability have been significantly improved. However, the shaping abilities of different nickel-titanium instruments are also different. At present, there are few reports about the influence of the shaping ability of R-phase heat treatment NIC X-FILE and DENCO Pre-Shaper in simulated curved canals.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the shaping effect of NIC X-FILE and DENCO Pre-Shaper nickel-titanium instruments in preparation for simulated curved canals.
METHODS: Fifty simulated resin-curved canals were selected and randomly divided into two groups (n=25). NIC X-FILE and DENCO Pre-Shaper nickel-titanium files were used for root canal preparation. The root canal preparation time was recorded. Images of pre-and post-root canal preparation were taken. Image processing and analysis software were used to measure the amount of resin removed from the inner and outer walls of the root canal at each observation point. Statistical software was used to compare the root canal preparation time and centering ability of two kinds of mechanical nickel-titanium files.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The average root canal preparation time was (1.58±0.02) minutes in the DENCO Pre-Shaper group and (2.22±0.03) minutes in the NIC X-FILE group. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). (2) The amount of resin removed from the inner walls of the root canal of the DENCO Pre-Shaper group at 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10 mm from the apical foramen was higher than that of the NIC X-FILE group (P < 0.05). The amount of resin removed from the outer walls of the root canal of the DENCO Pre-Shaper group at 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 mm from the apical foramen was lower than that of the NIC X-FILE group (P < 0.05). (3) At 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 mm away from apical foramen, the centering ability of the NIC X-FILE group was better than that of the DENCO Pre-Shaper group (P < 0.05), and the centering ability of the NIC X-FILE group was the best at 4 mm away from apical foramen. (4) The results show that DENCO Pre-Shaper has higher mechanical efficiency than NIC X-FILE nickel-titanium root canal files. However, the centering ability of DENCO Pre-Shaper is inferior to NIC X-FILE nickel-titanium root canal files.

Key words: NIC X-FILE, DENCO Pre-Shaper, root canal preparation, nickel-titanium instrument, root canal preparation time, centering ability

CLC Number:

Shen Yurong, Nai Rentong, Zhao Ling, Liu Feigang, Yin Caoyang, Gu Yuanping, Chen Tieyi. Influence of NIC X-FILE and DENCO Pre-Shaper nickel-titanium instruments on the shaping of simulated curved canals[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2024, 28(3): 387-391.

Figures/Tables 3

References

[1] CHIRILA M, SUCIU I, DIMITRIU B, et al. Performance Evaluation on Rotary Preparation of Root Canal by Beginner Operators. J Med Life. 2020;13(3):393-398.
[2] SARRAF P, KIOMARSI N, TAHERI FH, et al. Apical Transportation of Mesiobuccal Canals of Maxillary Molars Following Root Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems and Hand Files:A Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Assessment. Front Dent. 2019;16(4):272-278.
[3] SIANG LIN GS, SINGBAL KP, ABDUL GHANI NRN. A Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability,canal straightening,and preparation time of five different NiTi rotary files in simulated canals. J Conserv Dent. 2021;24(1):67-71.
[4] ELIASZ W, KUBIAK K, PONCYLJUSZ W, et al. Root Canal Transportation after Root Canal Preparation with ProTaper Next,WaveOne Gold,and Twisted Files. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3661.
[5] TÜFENKÇI P, YıLMAZ K, ADIGÜZEL M. Effects of the endodontic access cavity on apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using different single-file systems. Restor Dent Endod. 2020;45(3):e33.
[6] LI ML, LIAO WL, CAI HX. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of dentinal microcrack alterations during root canal preparation using single-file Ni-Ti systems. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15(1):494-499.
[7] MAMEDE-NETO I, BORGES ÁH, ALENCAR AHG, et al. Multidimensional Analysis of Curved Root Canal Preparation Using Continuous or Reciprocating Nickel-titanium Instruments. Open Dent J. 2018;12:32-45.
[8] 杨笑晗,杨旭.3种往复旋转单支镍钛器械预备模拟弯曲根管的效果比较[J].上海口腔医学,2021,30(6):595-598.
[9] AL-OBAIDA MI, ALZUWAYER AA, ALANAZI SS, et al. In Vitro Analysis of the Fatigue Resistance of Four Single File Canal Preparation Instruments. Materials(Basel). 2022;15(2):688.
[10] SOUSA-NETO MD, SILVA-SOUSA YC, MAZZI-CHAVES JF, et al. Root canal preparation using micro-computed tomography analysis:a literature review. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32(suppl 1):e66.
[11] GORAY MA, GADZHULA NG, MUNTIAN OV, et al. Comparative quality assessment of root canal preparation with different systems of endodontic instruments. Wiad Lek. 2020;73(6):1145-1148.
[12] HARIPRASAD R, ANOOP VN, RAJ PR, et al. Evaluation of Crack Propagation after Root Canal Preparation with Continuous and Reciprocating Files and Final Finishing with XP Endo Finisher-An In vitro Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13(Suppl 2):S1700-S1704.
[13] MARTINS JNR, SILVA EJNL, MARQUES D, et al. Design,Metallurgical Features,and Mechanical Behaviour of NiTi Endodontic Instruments from Five Different Heat-Treated Rotary Systems. Materials(Basel). 2022;15(3):1009.
[14] 梁宇红,岳林.根管治疗技术之根管机械预备(二)——根管预备技术和镍钛锉的发展[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2019,54(10):717-720.
[15] LIANG Y, YUE L. Evolution and development:engine-driven endodontic rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Int J Oral Sci. 2022;14(1):12.
[16] SCHNEIDER SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32(2): 271-275.
[17] 李婷婷,姜葳,潘悦萍.两种机用镍钛器械在模拟弯曲根管内的成形能力比较[J].口腔疾病防治,2019,27(4):246-249.
[18] 冯瑞明,薛明.4种机用镍钛器械在模拟弯曲根管内成形能力的实验研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2020,13(10):611-615+619.
[19] VAKILI-GILANI P, TAVANAFAR S, SALEH ARM, et al. Shaping ability of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated L-shaped canals:OneShape,Hero Shaper,and Revo-S. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1):378.
[20] 卞小禾,唐子圣.镍钛合金相与镍钛根管锉性能的研究进展[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2020,36(10):630-632.
[21] 杨殷杰,侯本祥,侯晓玫.R-相热处理镍钛根管锉的力学性能和根管预备成形能力[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2017,44(2):189-194.
[22] 陈晓播,陈晨,梁宇红.两种镍钛系统预备根管的有效性与安全性研究[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2016,48(1):101-104.
[23] ALFADLEY A, ALRAJHI A, ALISSA H, et al. Shaping Ability of XP Endo Shaper File in Curved Root Canal Models. Int J Dent. 2020;2020: 4687045.
[24] MAKI K, EBIHARA A, KIMURA S, et al. Enhanced root canal-centering ability and reduced screw-in force generation of reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments with a post-machining thermal treatment. Dent Mater J. 2020;39(2):251-255.
[25] 吴真真,张丽萍,郭文丽,等.3种机用镍钛器械预备弯曲根管中心定位能力的体外对比研究[J].口腔医学,2021,41(11):983-987+1046.
[26] ALSOFI L, RAJKHAN W, AL-HABIB M, et al. Characterization of the differential efficacy of austenitic vs martensitic NiTi rotary files in non-surgical root canal retreatment:a micro-CT analysis. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2021;26(9):465-474.
[27] FAUS-LLÁCER V, PULIDO OUARDI D, FAUS-MATOSES I, et al. Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Dentin Removal Capacity of Two NiTi Endodontic Reciprocating Systems for the Root Canal Treatment of Primary Molar Teeth. An In Vitro Study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(2):338.
[28] ZHANG Y, LIU J, GU Y. Analysis of second mesiobuccal root canal instrumentation in maxillary first molars with three nickel-titanium rotary instruments:a micro-computed tomographic study. Odontology. 2021;109(2):496-505.