Meta-analysis of vacuum-sealing drainage combined with antibiotic bone cement in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.3171

Abstract

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Vacuum-sealing drainage has the effect of promoting wound healing and preventing infection. At present, a large number of studies have confirmed the significant efficacy of vacuum-sealing drainage combined with antibiotic bone cement in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis, but the corresponding evidence is still lacking. A meta-analysis was performed on the effect of treatment of chronic osteomyelitis by vacuum-sealing drainage combined with antibiotic bone cement.
METHODS: CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMbase were searched to find randomized controlled trials of vacuum-sealing drainage combined with antibiotic bone cement for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. The retrieval time was from inception to February 2020. The quality of the included literature was strictly evaluated, and the RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis of the included research.
RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials involving 637 patients with chronic osteomyelitis were included, with the treatment group of 313 cases and control group of 324 cases. Due to the special wound therapy, it was difficult to implement blind method clinically, so there was partial implementation bias. (2) Meta-analysis results showed that the recurrence rate of chronic osteomyelitis treated with vacuum-sealing drainage with antibiotic bone cement was lower than that in the control group (OR=0.20, 95%CI:0.11-0.37, P < 0.000 01). In the healing rate (OR=3.44, 95%CI:2.01-5.92, P < 0.000 01), healing time (MD=-11.05, 95%CI: -18.59 to -3.52, P=0.004), duration of antibiotic use (MD=-12.36, 95%CI: -13.27 to -11.44, P < 0.000 01), visual analogue scale score (MD=-1.94, 95%CI:-2.80 to -1.08, P < 0.000 01), times of dressing change (MD=-5.78, 95%CI:-6 .64 to -5.12, P < 0.000 01), bone absorption time (MD=-0.81, 95%CI:-0.98 to -0.64, P < 0.000 01), and bone healing time (MD=-1.62, 95%CI:-2.22 to -1.03, P < 0.000 01) were all better in the vacuum-sealing drainage with antibiotic bone cement group than those in the control group.
CONCLUSION: The combination of vacuum-sealing drainage and antibiotic bone cement in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis has a significant advantage over the traditional treatment, which is worthy of clinical promotion. Limited by the quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality clinical studies.

Key words: bone, bone cement, osteomyelitis, drainage, antibiotics, recurrence, healing, meta-analysis

CLC Number:

Tian Lin, Shi Xiaoqing, Mao Jun, Zhang Nongshan, Zhang Li, Xing Runlin, Wang Peimin. Meta-analysis of vacuum-sealing drainage combined with antibiotic bone cement in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(16): 2618-2624.

Figures/Tables 12

References

[1] KREMERS HM, NWOJO ME, RANSOM JE, et al. Trends in the epidemiology of osteomyelitis: a population-based study, 1969 to 2009. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97(10):837-845.
[2] PARKKINEN M, MADANAT R, LINDAHL J, et al. Risk Factors for Deep Infection Following Plate Fixation of Proximal Tibial Fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(15):1292-1297.
[3] QIN CH, ZHOU CH, SONG HJ, et al. Infected bone resection plus adjuvant antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate versus infected bone resection alone in the treatment of diabetic forefoot osteomyelitis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):246.
[4] LEW DP, WALDVOGEL FA. Osteomyelitis. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(14):999-1007.
[5] MOUZOPOULOS G, KANAKARIS NK, KONTAKIS G, et al. Management of bone infections in adults: the surgeon’s and microbiologist’s perspectives. Injury. 2011; 42 Suppl 5:S18-S23.
[6] HELGESON MD, POTTER BK, TUCKER CJ, et al. Antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate use in combat-related open fractures. Orthopedics. 2009;32(5):323.
[7] KAUSHIK D, JOSHI N, KUMAR R, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy versus gauze dressings for the treatment of contaminated traumatic wounds. J Wound Care. 2017;6(10):600-606.
[8] BLUM ML, ESSER M, RICHARDSON M, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy reduces deep infection rate in open tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(9):499-505.
[9] SCHLATTERER DR, HIRSCHFELD AG, WEBB LX. Negative pressure wound therapy in grade IIIB tibial fractures: fewer infections and fewer flap procedures? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(5):1802-1811.
[10] KIM JH, KIM HJ, LEE DH. Comparison of the efficacy between closed incisional negative-pressure wound therapy and conventional wound management after total hip and knee arthroplasties: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(11):2804-2814.
[11] CHADWICK P, TAHERINEJAD F, HAMBERG K, et al. Clinical and scientific data on a silver-containing soft-silicone foam dressing: an overview. J Wound Care. 2009;18(11):483-484, 486-490.
[12] 李鹏,王玮,郝进军.负压封闭引流术联合抗生素骨水泥链珠治疗胫骨慢性骨髓炎分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究,2017, 28(4):131-132.
[13] 卢吉高,高书军,徐斌,等.负压封闭引流术联合抗生素骨水泥链珠治疗胫骨慢性骨髓炎临床效果[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2016,38(3):337-339.
[14] 孙庆山,王芳,石恩东,等.抗生素珠链植入联合VSD治疗对慢性骨髓炎患者红细胞免疫功能和生活质量的影响[J].山东医药,2017,57(37):76-78.
[15] 李宗原,王军,王陶,等.负压吸引引流技术联合抗生素骨水泥链珠治疗慢性骨髓炎[J].四川医学,2014,35(7):803-805.
[16] 谢炎秋.硫酸钙载医用万古霉素联合负压引流对慢性骨髓炎伴软组织缺损的临床疗效研究[J].中外医学研究,2018, 16(28):48-49.
[17] 王洪飞,纪占同,王子辉.负压封闭引流术联合抗生素骨水泥治疗创伤性骨髓炎的疗效观察[J].西部医学,2018,30(12): 1821-1824.
[18] 夏启水,邓平征,陆桂珍.万古霉素骨水泥与负压引流术对骨折内固定术后患者并发慢性骨髓炎抗感染的临床疗效评价[J].抗感染药学,2017,14(8):1617-1619.
[19] 王顺利.硫酸钙载医用万古霉素联合负压引流对慢性骨髓炎伴软组织缺损的疗效影响[J]. 中国伤残医学,2017,25(7):69-70.
[20] 严伟.万古霉素硫酸钙联合负压封闭引流对慢性骨髓炎患者红细胞沉降率、C反应蛋白的影响[J].医疗装备,2019, 32(14):115-116.
[21] 伍爱平,杨康华,邓刚,等.亚胺培南西司他丁骨水泥联合负压封闭引流技术治疗创伤后慢性骨髓炎的临床效果分析[J].赣南医学院学报,2019,39(12):1223-1225.
[22] LEW DP, WALDVOGEL FA. Osteomyelitis. Lancet. 2004;364(9431):369-379.
[23] WANG X, YU S, SUN D, et al. Current data on extremities chronic osteomyelitis in southwest China: epidemiology, microbiology and therapeutic consequences. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16251.
[24] 贾存岭,贾代良,吕琳,等.载抗生素硫酸钙人工骨治疗慢性骨髓炎及其细菌学分析[J].中国病原生物学杂志,2017, 12(5):464-469.
[25] 张永红,秦泗河,王栋,等.骨搬运治疗胫骨慢性骨髓炎,是否需要加用抗生素骨水泥[J]?中国矫形外科杂志,2017, 25(4):331-335.
[26] KARAMANIS EM, MATTHAIOU DK, MORAITIS LI, et al. Fluoroquinolones versus beta-lactam based regimens for the treatment of osteomyelitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(10):E297-E304.
[27] 祝勇刚,张大伟,赵广跃,等.抗生素骨水泥联合自体骨移植及环形外固定架修复骨髓炎后胫骨缺损[J].中国组织工程研究,2015,19(25):3942-3946.
[28] HAKE ME, YOUNG H, HAK DJ, et al. Local antibiotic therapy strategies in orthopaedic trauma: practical tips and tricks and review of the literature. Injury. 2015;46(8):1447-1456.
[29] QIN CH, ZHOU CH, SONG HJ, et al. Infected bone resection plus adjuvant antibiotic -impregnated calcium sulfate versus infected bone resection alone in the treatment of diabetic forefoot osteomyelitis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):246.
[30] 甘先民,侯悦媚,黄乙勇,等.不同成分骨水泥植入对胫骨慢性骨髓炎患者的临床疗效评价[J].中华医院感染学杂志, 2017,27(12):2763-2766.
[31] KALLALA R, HARRIS WE, IBRAHIM M, et al. Use of Stimulan absorbable calcium sulphate beads in revision lower limb arthroplasty: safety profile and complication rates. Bone Joint Res. 2018;7(10):570-579.
[32] DYM H, ZEIDAN J. Microbiology of acute and chronic osteomyelitis and antibiotic treatment. Dent Clin North Am. 2017;61(2):271-282.
[33] 赵宝成,袁天祥,马宝通,等.局部应用抗生素缓释系统治疗创伤后及内固定相关骨感染临床疗效观察[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2015,23(10):877-881.
[34] Lam WL, Garrido A, Stanley PR. Use of topical negative pressure in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(3):622-624.
[35] ELNIEL AR, GIANNOUDIS PV. Open fractures of the lower extremity: current management and clinical outcomes. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3(5):316-325.
[36] MORGENSTERN M, VALLEJO A, MCNALLY MA, et al. The effect of local antibiotic prophylaxis when treating open limb fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint Res. 2018;7(7):447-456.
[37] KEENEY JA, COOK JL, CLAWSON SW, et al. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy devices improve short-term wound complications, but not long-term infection rate following hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(4):723-728.
[38] KILPADI DV, LESSING C, DERRICK K. Healed porcine incisions previously treated with a surgical incision management system: mechanical, histomorphometric, and gene expression properties. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38(4):767-778.
[39] WILKES RP, KILPAD DV, ZHAO Y, et al. Closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy (CIM): biomechanics. Surg Innov. 2012;19(1):67-75.
[40] KILPADI DV, LESSING C, DERRICK K. Healed porcine incisions previously treated with a surgical incision management system: mechanical, histomorphometric, and gene expression properties. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38(4):767-778.
[41] TAN Y, WANG X, LI H, et al. The clinical efficacy of the vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the management of adult osteomyelitis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(2):255-259.
[42] LIU D, ZHANG L, LI T, et al. Negative-pressure wound therapy enhances local inflammatory responses in acute infected soft-tissue wound. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014;70(1):539-547.
[43] ORGILL DP, MANDERS EK, SUMPIO BE, et al. The mechanisms of action of vacuum assisted closure: more to learn. Surgery. 2009;146(1):40-51.
[44] 程海霞,吴松梅,明晓锋,等.VSD对骨折创面感染患者血清炎症因子及骨性标志物的影响[J].中华医院感染学杂志, 2019,29(23):3598-3602.
[45] 朱海涛,朱余龙,丁德刚,等.持续负压引流(VSD)对万古霉素骨水泥链珠中药物释放的影响[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2018,2(9):27-29.