Locking compression plate combined with minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation versus intramedullary interlocking nailing for senile distal tibia fractures

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2017.15.015

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of senile distal tibia fractures, locking compression plate (LCP) combined with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) exerts a satisfactory repair effect, and contributes to the function recovery of lower limbs.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the efficacy of LCP combined with MIPO versus intramedullary interlocking nailing for senile distal tibia fractures.

METHODS: Fifty-six elderly patients with distal tibia fracture were allotted to minimally invasive and intramedullary nailing groups (n=28 per group), and received the treatment of LCP combined with MIPO and intramedullary interlocking nailing fixation, respectively. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative AOFAS ankle-hind foot scale scores, postoperative ambulation time, healing time, postoperative complications and the excellent and good rate in Johner-Wruhs’ criteria were compared between two groups.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The operation time, AOFAS ankle-hind foot scale scores, ambulation time, and healing time in the minimally invasive group were significantly superior to those in the intramedullary nailing group (P < 0.05). (2) The minimally invasive group showed a significantly higher excellent and good rate (96%) than the intramedullary nailing group (79%) (P < 0.05). (3) Compared with the intramedullary nailing group, the incidence of complications was significantly reduced in the minimally invasive group (P < 0.05). (4) Our findings suggest that the combination of LCP and MIPO not only preserves the most of blood supply, and soft tissues surrounding the fracture end as suggested by the BO principle, but also is conducive for fracture healing, and holds good efficacy.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：人工关节；骨植入物；脊柱；骨折；内固定；数字化骨科；组织工程

Key words: Tibial Fractures, Internal Fixators, Aged

CLC Number:

R318

Zhang Zhi-xin, Zhou Jun-dong, Chen Xing-yang, Shao Lei. Locking compression plate combined with minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation versus intramedullary interlocking nailing for senile distal tibia fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2017, 21(15): 2378-2382.

Figures/Tables 2

References

[1] 陈仲,杨洪昌,赵学凌.骨折内固定治疗精要[M].昆明: 云南科技出版社,2012: 203.

[2] Krettek C, Mller M, Miclau T. Evolution of minimally invasive plate ostesynthesis (MIPO) in the femur.Injury.2001; 32 (Suppl 3):14-23.

[3] Zou J, Zhang W, Zhang CQ.Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous plateosteosynthesis with open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of extra-articular distal tibia fractures.Injury.2013;44(8):1102-1106.

[4] Richard RD, Kubiak E, Horwitz DS,et al.Techniques for the surgical treatment ofdistal tibia fractures.Orthop Clin North Am.2014;45(3):295-312.

[5] ScheerlinckT, Ng CS, Handelberg F, et al. Medium term results of percutaneous, arthroscopically Assited osteosynthesis of fratures of the tibial plateau. Jbone Joint Surg(Br).2013;16(80): 959-964.

[6] 范志航,熊雁,杜全印,等.新型点式接触锁定加压接骨板在治疗四肢长骨骨折中的临床应用[J].创伤外科杂志, 2014,16(3):240-243.

[7] 曹前来,王安,杨海涛,等.微创锁定钢板内固定治疗胫骨多段骨折的疗效[J].武警医学. 2014;25(5):472-474.

[8] Mauffrey C, Mc Guinness K, Parsons N, et al.A randomised pilot trial of “locking plate” fixation versus intramedullary nailing for extra-articular fractures of the distaltibia.Bone Joint Surg Br.2012;94(5):704-708.

[9] Farouk O, Kreetk C, Miclau T, et al.Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than traditional technique.J Orthop Trauma.1999;13(6):401-406．

[10] Ueller CA, Eingartner C, Schreitmueller E, et al. Primary stability ofvarious forms of osteosynthesis in the treatment of fractures of the Proxim al tibia.J Bone Joint Surg(Br). 2005; 7(3):26-432.

[11] 任一,胡春宁,陈其宽,等.两种微创内固定治疗胫骨干中下段骨折疗效分析[J].实用骨科杂志,2014,20(8):715-719.

[12] 马敏,蔡俊丰,尹峰,等.两种术式治疗胫骨中段闭合性骨折的疗效比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2012,20(18):1661-1664.

[13] Liporace FA, Stadler CM, Yoon RS. Problems,tricks,and pearls in intramedullary nailing of proximal third tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma.2013;27(1): 56-62.

[14] Hess F, Sommer C. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the distal fibula with the locking compression plate: first experience of 20 cases. Orthop Trauma.2011;25(2):110–115.

[15] Janssen KW, Biert J, van Kampen A.Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail: a retrospective outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients.Int Orthop.2007;31(5):709-714.

[16] Collinge C,Protzman R.Outcomes of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for metaphyseal distal tibia fractures.Orthop Trauma.2010;24:24-29.

[17] 胡喜春,黄长明.MIPPO 技术结合 LCP 内固定治疗胫骨远端骨折[J].实用骨科杂志,2012,18(3):211-212.

[18] Kucukdurmaz F, Akpinar F, Saka G ,et al．A newly designed intramedullary nail with distal interlocking system for tibia fractures in adults-the clinical results. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg.2012;18: 243-249.

[19] 彭磊.扩髓与不扩髓带锁髓内钉治疗长管骨骨折临床探析 [J].吉林医学, 2015(07):140-141.

[20] 林成寿,刘寿坤,吴锦清,等.解剖型腔骨髓内钉微创治疗腔骨远端骨折创伤外科杂志[J],2010,12(6):520-522.

[21] Richard RD, Kubiak E, Horwitz DS.Techniques for the surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures.Orthop Clin North Am.2014;45(3):295-312.

[22] Heather VA,Ann BS.Randomized prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures.Orthop Trauma.2011;12:736-741.

[23] El Attal R,Hansen M,Rosenberger R,et al.Intramedullary nailing of the distal tibia illustrated with the Expert(TM) tibia nail.Oper Orthop Traumatol.2011;23(5):397-410.

[24] Casstevens C,Le T,Archdeacon MT,et al.Management of extraarticular fractures of the distal tibia：intramedullary nailing ve Isus plate fixation.Am Acad Orthop Surg.2012;20:675-683.

[25] Katsoulis E, Court-Brown C, Giannoudis PV. Incidence and aetiology of anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of the femur and tibia.Bone Joint Surg Br.2006;88(5):576–580.