Comparison of three kinds of bone replacement materials in the treatment of bone defects around the mandibular posterior teeth with immediate implantation

doi:10.12307/2021.245

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Guided bone regeneration is an effective method to solve bone defects in the implant area, but the choice of bone replacement material is still controversial.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the treatment effect of different materials in the bone defects around the mandibular posterior teeth with immediate implantation.
METHODS: From May 2016 to January 2019, 138 patients with bone defects around the mandibular posterior teeth, who were admitted to the Department of Stomatology in Peking University People’s Hospital, were selected. The patients were divided into three groups by random number table method, and were respectively implanted Bio-oss, Bone Plant, and PerioGlas bone replacement materials during immediate implantation, with 46 cases in each group respectively. Postoperative regular follow-up was conducted to compare the implant success rate, marginal bone level, buccal-lingual bone plate width, vertical height, periodontal index, and patient satisfaction in the three groups. This study had been approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital, approval No. [Ethical approval(R20160412)].
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The success rate of implants in the Bone Plant group was higher than that in the PerioGlas group 12 months after PerioGlas operation (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between other groups (P > 0.05). (2) The edge bone levels of the Bio-OSS group and the Bone Plant group were lower than those in the PerioGlas group (P < 0.05). The width and vertical height of the buccal lingual bone plate were higher than those in the PerioGlas group (P < 0.05). The vertical height of the Bone Plant group at 6 and 12 months after operation was higher than that of the Bio-Oss group (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the horizontal edge bone and the width of the buccal-lingual bone plate between the two groups (P > 0.05). (3) At 6 and 12 months after the operation, there was no significant difference in the depth of periodontal probe, the positive rate of exploratory bleeding and the gingival index between the three groups (P > 0.05). (4) There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between the three groups (P > 0.05). (5) The results showed that the Bio-OSS, PerioGlas, and Bone Plant all had certain effects of inducing bone regeneration and osteogenesis, while the Bio-OSS absorbed slowly but maintained a certain bone plate width, and the Bone Plant maintained a good vertical height and space stability of bone defect, making it an ideal bone replacement material.

Key words: materials, oral cavity, bone regeneration, implants, Bio-Oss, Bone Plant, PerioGlas, immediate implantation, bone formation, satisfaction

CLC Number:

Xiao Sha, Gao Chengzhi, Zhou Dongping. Comparison of three kinds of bone replacement materials in the treatment of bone defects around the mandibular posterior teeth with immediate implantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(34): 5495-5500.

Figures/Tables 6

References

[1] BUSENLECHNER D, MAILATH-POKORNY G, HAAS R, et al. Graftless full-arch implant rehabilitation with interantral implants and immediate or delayed loading-part Ⅱ: transition from the failing maxillary dentition. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(5):1150-1155.
[2] FÜRHAUSER R, MAILATH-POKORNY G, HAAS R, et al. Patient-perceived morbidity and subjective functional impairment following immediate transition from a failing dentition to fixed implant rehabilitation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(3):651-656.
[3] ELGALI I, OMAR O, DAHLIN C, et al. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. Eur J Oral Sci. 2017;125(5):315-337.
[4] WESSING B, LETTNER S, ZECHNER W. Guided Bone Regeneration with Collagen Membranes and Particulate Graft Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(1): 87-100.
[5] TETTAMANTI L, ANDRISANI C, BASSI MA, et al. Immediate loading implants: review of the critical aspects. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2017; 10(2):129-139.
[6] FILLINGHAM Y, JACOBS J. Bone grafts and their substitutes. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):6-9.
[7] ALUDDEN HC, MORDENFELD A, HALLMAN M, et al. Lateral ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss alone or Bio-Oss mixed with particulate autogenous bone graft: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(8):1030-1038.
[8] ASMITA, GUPTA V, BAINS VK, et al. Clinical and cone beam computed tomography comparison of NovaBone Dental Putty and PerioGlas in the treatment of mandibular Class II furcations. Indian J Dent Res. 2014; 25(2):166-173.
[9] 王鸣照,何家才.两种不同骨替代材料在上颌前牙区种植体周围骨缺损中的应用效果评价[J].安徽医药,2018,22(3):440-444.
[10] 刘晓庆.两种不同骨替代材料在即刻种植下颌后牙区周围骨缺损中的临床效果对比[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2019,27(S1):17-19.
[11] ALBREKTSSON T, ZARB G, WORTHINGTON P, et al. The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1(1):11-25．
[12] 胡兴周.丁硼乳膏在牙齿正畸固定矫正中对牙龈炎患者牙龈指数、菌斑指数与龈沟出血指数的影响[J].中国美容医学,2019,28(11): 111-114.
[13] MUÑOZ V, DUQUE A, GIRALDO A, et al. Prevalence of Peri-implant Disease According to Periodontal Probing Depth and Bleeding on Probing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(4):e89-e105.
[14] 李林峰,李月,李瑞玉,等.骨移植和组织工程支架材料在上颌窦提升口腔种植修复中的应用[J].中国组织工程研究,2017,21(34): 5558-5564.
[15] RODRIGUEZ AE, MONZAVI M, YOKOYAMA CL, et al. Zirconia dental implants: A clinical and radiographic evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(6):538-544.
[16] 康博,潘颖菁,温玉洁,等.钛网结合无机牛骨在磨牙区种植同期垂直骨增量的应用[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2019,24(3):106-109.
[17] 李林芝,陈丹,黄元丁,等.三维打印个性化钛网联合引导骨再生术修复牙槽骨缺损的临床初探[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2019,54(9): 623-627.
[18] LIU HY, ZHENG H, HOU XP, et al. Bio-Oss(®) for delayed osseointegration of implants in dogs: a histological study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 52(8):729-734.
[19] DE MELO PEREIRA D, HABIBOVIC P. Biomineralization-Inspired Material Design for Bone Regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(22): e1800700.
[20] KLUGE A, NEUDERT M, KUNERT-KEIL C, et al. The Obliteration of Noncritical Size Bone Defects With Bone Dust or Bone Replacement Material (Bioactive Glass S53P4). Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(4):e415-e423.
[21] 吕娟,高子龙,朱友家,等.梯度脱矿自体牙配合Bio-Oss骨粉用于牙槽骨缺损修复的研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2018,34(4):205-208.
[22] VIVAN RR, MECCA CE, BIGUETTI CC, et al. Experimental maxillary sinus augmentation using a highly bioactive glass ceramic. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27(2):41.
[23] VAN HOUDT CIA, ULRICH DJO, JANSEN JA, et al. The performance of CPC/PLGA and Bio-Oss ® for bone regeneration in healthy and osteoporotic rats. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018;106(1): 131-142.
[24] 赖思煜,习利军,倪俊鑫.两种材料在拔牙后引导骨组织再生位点保存术中的应用效果[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版),2019, 13(5):284-290.
[25] 马晓杰,卞一峰,吴大明,等.两种人工骨粉进行拔牙位点保存的临床对比研究[J].口腔生物医学,2019,10(3):139-142.
[26] 何浩,徐梦婷,肖强,等.富血小板纤维蛋白联合人工骨粉在口腔种植引导性骨再生中的临床应用价值[J].现代生物医学进展,2019, 19(10):1920-1923.
[27] 黄海霞,兰玉燕,付小明,等.浓缩生长因子对慢性牙周炎患者即刻种植修复的影响[J].中国临床研究,2018,31(6):741-743,748.
[28] 董瑶,董飞君,潘凌峰,等. Bio-Oss骨粉联合富血小板纤维蛋白对口腔种植引导性骨再生术后黏膜愈合和骨缺损再生的影响研究[J].中国全科医学,2017,20(B12):152-154.　
[29] 许明悠,刘永恒,汪鹏生,等.生物活性玻璃基骨修复材料的研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志,2019,39(7):440-448.
[30] DA FONSECA GF, AVELINO SOM, MELLO DCR, et al. Scaffolds of PCL combined to bioglass: synthesis, characterization and biological performance. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2020;31(5):41.
[31] SIDDESHAPPA ST, BHATNAGAR S, DIWAN V, et al. Regenerative potential of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of periodontal infrabony defects. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2018;22(6):492-497.
[32] SAURO S, BABBAR A, GHARIBI B, et al. Cellular differentiation, bioactive and mechanical properties of experimental light-curing pulp protection materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34(6):868-878.
[33] SLEIBI A, TAPPUNI A, MILLS D, et al. Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Fluoride Varnishes on Dentin Remineralization During a Critical pH Exposure Using Quantitative X-Ray Microtomography. Oper Dent. 2018;43(6):E308-E316.
[34] ZENG Q, DESAI MS, JIN HE, et al. Self-Healing Elastin-Bioglass Hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17(8):2619-2625.
[35] PINTADO-PALOMINO K, PEITL FILHO O, ZANOTTO ED, et al. A clinical, randomized, controlled study on the use of desensitizing agents during tooth bleaching. J Dent. 2015;43(9):1099-1105.
[36] 王晓娜,赵静辉,储顺礼,等.骨替代材料在口种植领域中的成骨效果[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2016,43(1):113-117.
[37] D’ALESSANDRO D, PERALE G, MILAZZO M, et al. Bovine bone matrix/poly(l-lactic-co-ε-caprolactone)/gelatin hybrid scaffold (SmartBone®) for maxillary sinus augmentation: A histologic study on bone regeneration. Int J Pharm. 2017;523(2):534-544.
[38] SCAGLIONE S, LAZZARINI E, ILENGO C, et al. A composite material model for improved bone formation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2010; 4(7):505-513.
[39] 马杰.两种不同口腔修复膜材料对牙种植引导骨再生的作用及效果分析[J].中南医学科学杂志,2016,44(1):87-90.
[40] PACHIMALLA PR, MISHRA SK, CHOWDHARY R. Evaluation of hydrophilic gel made from Acemannan and Moringa oleifera in enhancing osseointegration of dental implants. A preliminary study in rabbits. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020;10(2):13-19.