中国组织工程研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (30): 4509-4514.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2016.30.015

• 材料生物相容性 material biocompatibility • 上一篇    下一篇

钛合金内固定材料修复脊柱结核:生物相容性及力学性能

庄 勇,尚显文,张 皓,刘 淼,许顺恩   

  1. 贵州医科大学附属医院骨科,贵州省贵阳市  550001
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-25 出版日期:2016-07-15 发布日期:2016-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 尚显文,主任医师,教授,硕士生导师,贵州医科大学附属医院骨科,贵州省贵阳市 550001
  • 作者简介:庄勇,男,1986年生,贵州省贵阳市人,汉族,硕士,主治医师,主要从事脊柱退变,脊柱创伤,脊柱肿瘤等方面研究。

Implant fixation with titanium alloy repairs spinal tuberculosis: its biocompatibility and mechanical properties

Zhuang Yong, Shang Xian-wen, Zhang Hao, Liu Miao, Xu Shun-en   

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550001, Guizhou Province, China
  • Received:2016-04-25 Online:2016-07-15 Published:2016-07-15
  • Contact: Shang Xian-wen, Chief physician, Professor, Master’s supervisor, Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550001, Guizhou Province, China
  • About author:Zhuang Yong, Master, Attending physician, Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550001, Guizhou Province, China

摘要:

文章快速阅读:

 

文题释义:
不锈钢材料
:是脊柱结核修复中常用的材料,该材料能够帮助患者重建脊柱,促进缺损部位修复。但不锈钢材料生物相容性较差,置入机体后材料与骨质膨胀系数不同,导致术后机体并发症发生率较高,不利于机体术后恢复。
钛合金内固定材料:钛属于是一种安全、无害的金属元素,该金属材料与人骨的弹性模量十分接近,因此在置入人体后,能与人体的力学产生良好的相容性。钛合金内固定材料具有密度小、韧性好、生物相容性好等优点,材料弹性模量与骨弹性模量十分接近,置入机体后不会引起过敏、发炎等并发症。


背景:目前,对于脊柱结核主要以内固定治疗为主,但选择何种内固定材料尚存在较大的争议。
目的:比较钛合金和不锈钢内固定材料修复家兔脊柱结核的生物相容性及力学性能。
方法:取30只家兔,建立家兔脊柱结核模型,随机分为2组,每组15只,分别置入不锈钢材料、钛合金材料进行内固定修复。置入30 d后,观察两组生物相容性,检测脊柱修复部位生物力学性能。
结果与结论:①生物相容性:钛合金内组未出现感染、免疫排斥等不良反应,不锈钢组3例家兔出现感染;②生物力学:钛合金组加载后前屈、后伸及侧弯距离显著小于不锈钢组(P < 0.05),前屈、后伸、侧弯位移量显著少于不锈钢组(P < 0.05),最大轴向拔出力显著大于不锈钢组(P < 0.05),前屈、后伸、侧弯及轴向压缩显著大于不锈钢组(P < 0.05);③结果表明:钛合金内固定材料具有良好的生物相容性,能够恢复和维持脊柱稳定性。

ORCID: 0000-0002-5714-2582(尚显文)

关键词: 生物材料, 骨生物材料, 钛合金, 不锈钢内固定材料, 脊柱结核, 生物相容性, 力学性能, 轴向拔出力, 稳定性

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Currently, surgical implant fixation is mainly applied for spinal tuberculosis. How to choose implant materials, however, is still under discussion.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of titanium alloy and stainless steel for rabbit spinal tuberculosis.
METHODS: Thirty rabbits were chosen to prepare spinal tuberculosis models. Then, the rabbits were equivalently randomized into two groups, which underwent implant fixation with stainless steel or titanium alloy, respectively. At 30 days after implantation, biocompatibility and biomechanical properties of the two materials in the repaired region of spine were observed and detected, respectively.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In view of the biocompatibility, infection and immunological rejection could not been found in the titanium alloy group; in contrast, infection appeared in three rabbits of the stainless steel group. Flexion, extension and lateral bending displacements under the spinal loading in the titanium alloy group were significantly less than those in the stainless steel group (P < 0.05); axial pull-out strength in the titanium alloy group was significantly higher than that in the stainless steel group (P < 0.05); flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial compression in the titanium alloy group were significantly greater than those in the stainless steel group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, titanium alloy material has good biocompatibility that can be used to restore and maintain the spinal stability.

 

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:生物材料;骨生物材料; 口腔生物材料; 纳米材料; 缓释材料; 材料相容性;组织工程

Key words: uberculosis, Spinal, Stainless Steel, Biomechanics, Tissue Engineering

中图分类号: