中国组织工程研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 602-607.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2016.04.026

• 骨与关节循证医学 evidence-based medicine of the bone and joint • 上一篇    

防旋型股骨近端髓内钉与全髋关节置换修复老年股骨转子间骨折的Meta分析

阿布力米提•阿木提,刘利国,闫 斌,徐 超   

  1. Abulimiti•Amuti, Liu Li-guo, Yan Bin, Xu Chao
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-07 出版日期:2016-01-22 发布日期:2016-01-22
  • 通讯作者: 刘利国,在读硕士,新疆医科大学第二附属医院,新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 830063
  • 作者简介:阿布力米提?阿木提,男,1972年生,新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市人,维吾尔族,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事创伤及骨质疏松方面的研究。

A meta-analysis of proximal femoral nail antirotation and total hip arthroplasty for treating intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly

Abulimiti•Amuti, Liu Li-guo, Yan Bin, Xu Chao   

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830063, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2015-11-07 Online:2016-01-22 Published:2016-01-22
  • Contact: Liu Li-guo, Studying for master’s degree, Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830063, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
  • About author:Abulimiti?Amuti, Master, Associate chief physician, Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830063, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China

摘要:

文章快速阅读: 

文题释义:
全髋关节置换:由于股骨头置换后立即起到机械固定作用,不涉及骨折愈合,患侧髋关节功能迅速恢复;能提供早期的关节活动及负重,便于患者早期下床,避免长期卧床引起的并发症,解决了一般内固定不牢的弊端,避免了因内固定不良造成的髋内翻畸形,能够获得更好的关节功能。
防旋型股骨近端髓内钉:防旋型股骨近端髓内钉系统有6°外展角,可以使主钉顺利的打进股骨髓腔,其远端可屈性的设计,能有效避免局部应力的集中,以此防止股骨干的骨折。防旋型股骨近端髓内钉的螺旋刀片在打入的同时可以填压股骨头内的松质骨,以提高刀片周围松质骨的密度。螺旋刀片外侧的臼锁加压设计可以有效的控制刀片与股骨头的旋转,而且还可以使骨折进一步复位,减少了骨折周围血管的破坏。

 

 

背景:目前临床上已经有大量针对防旋型股骨近端髓内钉与全髋关节置换修复老年股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效报道,但哪种修复方式更有优越性,目前尚无明确结论。
目的:系统评价防旋型股骨近端髓内钉与全髋关节置换对老年股骨转子间骨折的修复效果。
方法:通过计算机检索2011至2015年万方数据库、PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase数据库等,同时手工检索国内主要期刊,搜集有关防旋型股骨近端髓内钉与全髋关节置换修复老年股骨转子间骨折的随机对照试验,选择术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、术后下床行走时间、Harris评分作为评价指标,采用RevMan 5.2进行数据分析。
结果与结论:最终共纳入7篇文献,共811例患者,均为中文文献。Meta分析结果显示,全髋关节置换组住院时间及下床负重时间明显短于防旋型股骨近端髓内钉组(P < 0.000 01),可减轻患者痛苦;全髋关节置换组在手术时间及术中出血方面,不如防旋型股骨近端髓内钉组效果好(P < 0.000 01);且两者治疗后髋关节Harris评分差异无显著性意义(P > 0.05)。提示防旋型股骨近端髓内钉置入内固定在微创治疗,即减少手术时间及术中出血方面有一定优势,全髋关节置换后可使患者较早恢复髋关节功能,允许早期负重行走,减少患者卧床时间,降低卧床并发症。因此临床应该根据老年股骨转子间骨折患者身体状况、损伤程度、骨折类型、经济承受能力等综合情况考虑选择合适的修复方案。

 中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:人工关节;骨植入物;脊柱;骨折;内固定;数字化骨科;组织工程


ORCID: 0000-0002-0052-5208刘利国)

关键词: 骨科植入物, 人工假体, 股骨转子间骨折, 全髋关节置换, 防旋型股骨近端髓内钉, Meta分析

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Now, the current study has not yet confirmed two treatment methods of the proximal femoral nail antirotation and total hip arthroplasty for treating intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly, which method has more advantages, and there is no clear conclusion at present. 
OBJECTIVE: To systematically compare the repair effect of proximal femoral nail antirotation and total hip arthroplasty for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. 
METHODS: We searched the related literatures from 2011 to 2015 on Wanfang database, PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase database by computer. We retrieved the journals in China by hand and collected randomized controlled trials on proximal femoral nail antirotation and total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, hospitalization time, ambulation time after operation, and Harris score were selected as evaluation indexes. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.2 software. 
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Finally, 7 Chinese literatures were included, with 811 patients. The results of meta analysis showed that the hospitalization time and ambulation time after operation were significantly shorter in the total hip arthroplasty group than in the proximal femoral nail antirotation group (P < 0.000 01), which reduced the pain of patients. Operation time and intraoperative blood loss were poorer in the total hip arthroplasty group than in the proximal femoral nail antirotation group (P < 0.000 01). No significant difference in Harris hip score was detected between the two groups (P > 0.05). These results confirmed that the internal fixation of proximal femoral nail antirotation in minimally invasive therapy when reducing operation time and blood loss has a certain advantage. The total hip arthroplasty can make the recovery of hip function earlier, allow early weight-bearing walking, reduce the patients’ bedridden time and reduce the complications in bed. Thus, the clinicians in the practical work should choose the appropriate therapy with considering the patient’s condition, damage degree, fracture type, and financial capability.